Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Your score will improve and your results will be more realistic
Is there something wrong with our timer?Let us know!
According to most scientists, the universe began approximately 10 to 15 billion years ago and has been expanding ever since. This theory, known as the Big Bang theory, is the fairly direct result of Hubble’s law, which states that objects farther away from Earth are receding faster than those closer. This expansion implies a singular point which all matter is expanding from.
Complicating the scientific explanation is that the Big Bang cannot be thought of as an explosion from some identifiable source—rather, space and time were created in the Big Bang. Furthermore, the relationship between distance and speed is not precisely linear. So, if one were to think of galaxies as particles created in a big bang, these galaxies have both a local component of motion, as well as playing a role in the overall expansion of the universe.
A further complication is that galactic distances are so great that galactic motion, even if the galaxies are moving at incredible speeds, is difficult to observe. Scientists must, therefore, rely on a “standard candle,” an object of known brightness within the galaxy they wish to observe. Using the inverse square law, scientists can then measure how far that galaxy is away from our own. For instance, suppose a supernova in galaxy A appears one hundred times as bright as one in galaxy B. By the inverse square law, galaxy B is ten times farther away than galaxy A, assuming, of course, that distance is the only factor affecting brightness.
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
69% (02:22) correct
31% (01:56) wrong based on 106 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
It can be inferred from the sentence highlighted in the passage that a standard candle is useful to scientists for which of the following reasons?
A) Standard candles do not have their own locus of motion. B) Standard candles more reliably adhere to the law of inverse squares than do other supernovas. C) Only standard candles provide a known measure of brightness. D) Knowledge of an object’s brightness allows scientists to measure the speed at which the object is moving toward Earth. E) Knowledge of an object’s brightness allows scientists to accurately measure its distance from Earth.
Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
Question Stats:
51% (01:12) correct
49% (01:02) wrong based on 115 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
Consider each of the choices separately and select all that apply.
According to the passage, if two astronomical objects of differing distances from Earth were observed, which of the following would be true of the object closer to Earth?
❑ It would not be as bright as the object farther from Earth. ❑ It would be younger than the object farther from Earth. ❑ It would be traveling away from the Earth more slowly than the farther object.
Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
65% (00:49) correct
35% (01:14) wrong based on 85 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
It can be inferred from the passage that a standard candle may not provide an accurate measure of distance if
A) the galaxy being measured is moving too quickly B) interstellar dust makes the object measured appear dimmer than it really is C) if the galaxy being measured has a local component of the measurement D) the particles being measured do not completely accord with a linear motion E) the galaxies being measured move at different speeds
Question 4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
76% (00:56) correct
24% (01:05) wrong based on 85 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
According to the passage, if two supernovas are observed and one of those supernovas is brighter than the other, scientists can conclude that
A) the brighter supernova is moving closer to our galaxy at a higher speed B) the precise location of the supernova is measurable C) the brighter supernova may be closer to our own galaxy D) the brighter supernova is farther away from Earth by a distance that is roughly inversely proportional to the dim supernova E) the distance between the supernovas and our own galaxy is inversely proportional
Re: According to most scientists, the universe began approximat
[#permalink]
22 Jan 2019, 23:34
1
1) The author mentions the “Prozac lag” primarily in order to:
The author introduces a new theory neurogenesis in first paragraph.He also said that the new theory could be used for research in new applications. In second paragraph he goes on to describe a new specific application where neurogenesis could be used to describe Prozac lag. Hence option B serves as best answer for this question.
2) In the second paragraph, select the sentence in which the author describes an unexpected observation. " However, patients suffering from depression only begin to experience mood elevation weeks after beginning treatment." The author says that after antidepressant there should be instant mood elevation. However this does not happen and then describes what happens otherwise. This sentence with however is thus unexpected and is our answer for this question.
Re: According to most scientists, the universe began approximat
[#permalink]
23 Jan 2019, 19:14
Could someone please provide an explanation for the third question?
It can be inferred from the passage that a standard candle may not provide an accurate measure of distance if
A) the galaxy being measured is moving too quickly B) interstellar dust makes the object measured appear dimmer than it really is C) if the galaxy being measured has a local component of measurement D) the particles being measured do not completely accord with a linear motion E) the galaxies being measured move at different speeds
Re: According to most scientists, the universe began approximat
[#permalink]
29 Jan 2019, 19:52
3
Explanation For Question 3)
It can be inferred from the passage that a standard candle may not provide an accurate measure of distance if
A) the galaxy being measured is moving too quickly B) interstellar dust makes the object measured appear dimmer than it really is C) if the galaxy being measured has a local component of measurement D) the particles being measured do not completely accord with a linear motion E) the galaxies being measured move at different speeds
Last line says "...assuming, of course, that distance is the only factor affecting brightness." In other words, if ANYTHING other than distance is affecting the brightness then you wouldn't get an accurate measurement. The only answer choice which suggests brightness is the second one.
Re: According to most scientists, the universe began approximat
[#permalink]
02 Jun 2021, 19:06
shuklamitanshu wrote:
Explanation For Question 3)
It can be inferred from the passage that a standard candle may not provide an accurate measure of distance if
A) the galaxy being measured is moving too quickly B) interstellar dust makes the object measured appear dimmer than it really is C) if the galaxy being measured has a local component of measurement D) the particles being measured do not completely accord with a linear motion E) the galaxies being measured move at different speeds
Last line says "...assuming, of course, that distance is the only factor affecting brightness." In other words, if ANYTHING other than distance is affecting the brightness then you wouldn't get an accurate measurement. The only answer choice which suggests brightness is the second one.
It is Clearly mentioned that " if the galaxies are moving at incredible speeds, is difficult to observe." so it should be option A no right? please explain
According to most scientists, the universe began approximat
[#permalink]
02 Jun 2021, 21:14
1
Hi,
It can be inferred from the passage that a standard candlemay not provide an accurate measure of distance if ...
Consider this from the passage : Scientists must, therefore, rely on a “standard candle,” an object of known brightness within the galaxy they wish to observe. Using the inverse square law, scientists can then measure how far that galaxy is away from our own. For instance, suppose a supernova in galaxy A appears one hundred times as bright as one in galaxy B. By the inverse square law, galaxy B is ten times farther away than galaxy A, assuming, of course, that distance is theonlyfactor affecting brightness.
We need to find answer relative to measuring the distance. So if light is coming without any blockage, distance from earth can be measured.
wewake06298 wrote:
shuklamitanshu wrote:
Explanation For Question 3)
It can be inferred from the passage that a standard candle may not provide an accurate measure of distance if
A) the galaxy being measured is moving too quickly B) interstellar dust makes the object measured appear dimmer than it really is C) if the galaxy being measured has a local component of measurement D) the particles being measured do not completely accord with a linear motion E) the galaxies being measured move at different speeds
Last line says "...assuming, of course, that distance is the only factor affecting brightness." In other words, if ANYTHING other than distance is affecting the brightness then you wouldn't get an accurate measurement. The only answer choice which suggests brightness is the second one.
It is Clearly mentioned that " if the galaxies are moving at incredible speeds, is difficult to observe." so it should be option A no right? please explain
Re: According to most scientists, the universe began approximat
[#permalink]
07 May 2023, 19:38
shravyashetty wrote:
Could someone please provide an explanation for the third question?
It can be inferred from the passage that a standard candle may not provide an accurate measure of distance if
A) the galaxy being measured is moving too quickly B) interstellar dust makes the object measured appear dimmer than it really is C) if the galaxy being measured has a local component of measurement D) the particles being measured do not completely accord with a linear motion E) the galaxies being measured move at different speeds
By the inverse square law in the last paragraph, we know that the distance is the ONLY factor that affects brightness, with which we can directly calculate the distance. But intervened by stardust, the relation is uncertain because we don't know how to fix this.
Re: According to most scientists, the universe began approximat
[#permalink]
21 Sep 2024, 07:23
1
Expert Reply
Question #1
E
In the last paragraph, the author discusses the difficulties inherent in measuring intergalactic distances. He notes that scientists use a standard candle in combination with the inverse square law to measure those distances.
Re: According to most scientists, the universe began approximat
[#permalink]
21 Sep 2024, 07:24
1
Expert Reply
Question #2
C
The passage states in the third paragraph that brighter objects are closer than dim objects, so eliminate (A). The passage never specifies what scientists know about the age of astronomical objects, so eliminate (B). The first paragraph says that, according to Hubble’s law, “objects farther away from Earth are receding faster than those closer.” This means that the farther object will travel faster, so (C) is correct.
Re: According to most scientists, the universe began approximat
[#permalink]
21 Sep 2024, 07:26
1
Expert Reply
Question #3
B
According to the last line in the paragraph, “By the inverse square law, galaxy B is ten times farther away than galaxy A, assuming, of course, that distance is the only factor affecting brightness.” Therefore, if interstellar dust affects the brightness of an object, the brightness of the object is affected, and the distance scientists measure may be inaccurate.
Re: According to most scientists, the universe began approximat
[#permalink]
21 Sep 2024, 07:26
1
Expert Reply
Question #4
C
According to the passage, “By the inverse square law, galaxy B is ten times farther away than galaxy A, assuming, of course, that distance is the only factor affecting brightness.” Therefore, assuming that all other factors affecting brightness can be known, we can conclude that the brighter of the supernovas will be closer to Earth.
According to most scientists, the universe began approximat
[#permalink]
21 Sep 2024, 09:02
Expert Reply
The passage says
For instance, suppose a supernova in galaxy A appears one hundred times as bright as one in galaxy B. By the inverse square law, galaxy B is ten times farther away than galaxy A, assuming, of course, that distance is the only factor affecting brightness.
So we have galaxy A and galaxy B, In galaxy A we have a supernova and in galaxy B as well
By the inverse square law and the distance is the only variable that comes into play, the supernova in galaxy A appears to us brighter than the supernova in galaxy B because supernavoa in galaxy A is closer to us because galaxy A as a whole is close to our own galaxy
However, choice E tells us
E) the distance between the supernovas and our own galaxy is inversely proportional
This is false. Even though the law is about the inverse square we do know that the brightness is direct proportional because the supernova is A is closer to us. B is far away. Even though, as I said, could be even possible that the two supernovas have the same brightness
I hope now is more clear
PS:; I believe that question 4 is NOT properly written
Something for me is missing
gmatclubot
According to most scientists, the universe began approximat [#permalink]