Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 02:09 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 02:09
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New comers' posts
New posts
Unanswered

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
PREVIOUS TOPIC
NEXT TOPIC

For the violence in Kirkenberg to be stopped, the majority of surround

SORT BY:
Date
Kudos
Tags :
Find Similar Topics  About  Add a Tag

Show Tags
Hide Tags

User avatar
D
GeminiHeat
GRE Prep Club Team Member
Joined: 20 Feb 2017
Posts: 2507
Own Kudos [?]: 3246 [2]
Given Kudos: 1051
GPA: 3.39
Send PM
For the violence in Kirkenberg to be stopped, the majority of surround [#permalink] New post   17 Mar 2021, 05:30
1
Expert Reply
1
Bookmarks
Question 1
00:00

Question Stats:

38% (01:21) correct 63% (01:47) wrong based on 32 sessions

Hide Show timer Statistics

For the violence in Kirkenberg to be stopped, the majority of surrounding nations must vote to send a peacekeeping force, and the wealthy nation of Nandia must provide funding. If Nandia becomes involved in any way regarding Kirkenberg, at least half of the nations surrounding Kirkenberg will vote against intervening in Kirkenberg.


The claims above most strongly support which of the following conclusions?

(A) Nandia is the wealthiest nation in the region surrounding Kirkenberg.

(B) Violence in Kirkenberg is likely to result in unrest in other countries in the region.

(C) It is unlikely that the violence in Kirkenberg will be stopped.

(D) Most nations surrounding Kirkenberg oppose the current leadership in Nandia.

(E) The peacekeeping forces would not have sufficient equipment without financial support from Nandia.

ShowHide Answer Question #1
Official Answer
C
User avatar
D
rx10
Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Dec 2020
Posts: 1833
Own Kudos [?]: 2118 [3]
Given Kudos: 140
GRE 1: Q168 V157

GRE 2: Q167 V161
Send PM
Re: For the violence in Kirkenberg to be stopped, the majority of surround [#permalink] New post   17 Mar 2021, 07:57
3
This is a very nice question. You have to read carefully while attempting this kind of question.

So the passage says that the violence in Kirkenberg can be stopped if surrounding countries vote to send peace keeping force & Nandia must provide funding as it is a wealthy nation. IF Nandia take part in this then atleast half of the nation will oppose the intervention in Kirkenberg.

Now let's go to choices :

(A) Nandia is the wealthiest nation in the region surrounding Kirkenberg. We can't say for sure that it is the wealthiest nation.

(B) Violence in Kirkenberg is likely to result in unrest in other countries in the region. The passage says that atleast half of the countries will oppose but i does not mean that it will create unrest.

(C) It is unlikely that the violence in Kirkenberg will be stopped. This can happen as Nandia being a wealthy nation must provide funding but if Nandia involves itself then more than half country will oppose the intervention so violence may not stop.

(D) Most nations surrounding Kirkenberg oppose the current leadership in Nandia. Nowhere in the passage this is mentioned.

(E) The peacekeeping forces would not have sufficient equipment without financial support from Nandia. This can be true but Nandia's monetary help may be needed for something else rather than equipment purchase. It can be of anything.
avatar
B
Samamammadova8888
Manager
Manager
Joined: 30 Jun 2021
Posts: 52
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 15
Send PM
Re: For the violence in Kirkenberg to be stopped, the majority of surround [#permalink] New post   25 Aug 2021, 00:51
I didn't understand variant C, can you explain only this one again please?
User avatar
D
Carcass
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 28623
Own Kudos [?]: 33099 [1]
Given Kudos: 25173
Send PM
Re: For the violence in Kirkenberg to be stopped, the majority of surround [#permalink] New post   25 Aug 2021, 02:44
1
Expert Reply
Question Type: Inference

Situation: To stop violence in Kirkland, vote to send a peacekeeping force + funding from Nandia is required
But
If Nandia helps surrounding nations will not vote to send a peacekeeping force.

We have to find an option that must be true based on the stated facts.

(A) Nandia is the wealthiest nation in the region surrounding Kirkenberg. - Incorrect. Out of scope.

(B) Violence in Kirkenberg is likely to result in unrest in other countries in the region. - Incorrect. Out of scope.

(C) It is unlikely that the violence in Kirkenberg will be stopped. - Correct. There are 2 requirements to stop the violence. But both the requirements cannot be fulfilled.

(D) Most nations surrounding Kirkenberg oppose the current leadership in India - Incorrect. Out of scope.

(E) The peacekeeping forces would not have sufficient equipment without financial support from Nandia - Incorrect. Out of scope.

Answer: C
Prep Club for GRE Bot
gmatclubot
[#permalink]
Moderators:
VibhuAnurag
GRE Instructor
218 posts
HarishKumar
GRE Instructor
1029 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Main navigation

Partners

GRE Resources

www.ets.org/gre | About | Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy | Prep Club for GRE Rules | Contact