GRE Prep Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 28Live Online Class with Top GRE Expert Mike Butville
08:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GRE course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP GRE OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon/Wed Sept. 28, 2026 - Dec. 9, 2026, 8:00pm-10:00pm EST
As to when the first people populated the American subcontinents is ho
[#permalink]
11 Nov 2025, 03:30
11 Nov 2025, 03:30
Expert Reply
Question 1
00:00
Question Stats:
91% (02:45) correct
9% (00:12) wrong based on 11 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Question 2
00:00
Question Stats:
33% (01:24) correct
67% (01:43) wrong based on 15 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Question 3
00:00
Question Stats:
25% (01:30) correct
75% (02:56) wrong based on 12 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Question 4
00:00
Question Stats:
14% (01:16) correct
86% (02:25) wrong based on 7 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
As to when the first people populated the American subcontinents is hotly debated. Until recently, the Clovis people, based on evidence found in New Mexico, were thought to have been the first to have arrived, some 13,000 years ago. Yet evidence gathered from other sites suggest the Americas had been settled at least 1,000 years prior to the Clovis. The "Clovis first" idea, nonetheless, was treated as gospel, backed by supporters who, at least initially, outright discounted any claims that suggested precedence by non-Clovis people. While such a stance smacked of fanaticism, proponents did have a solid claim: if the Clovis peoples crossed the Bering Strait 13,000 years ago, only after it had become ice-free, how would a people have been able to make a similar trip but over ice?
A recent school of thought, backed by Weber, provides the following answer: pre-Clovis people reached the Americas by relying on a sophisticated maritime culture, which allowed them to take advantage of refugia, or small areas in which aquatic life flourished. Thus they were able to make the long journey by hugging the coast as far south as to what is today British Columbia. Additionally, they were believed to have fashioned a primitive form of crampon so that they would be able to dock in these refugia and avail themselves of the microfauna. Still, such a theory begs the question as to how such a culture developed.
The Solutrean theory has been influential in answering this question, a fact that may seem paradoxical--and startling--to those familiar with its line of reasoning: the Clovis people were actually Solutreans, an ancient seafaring culture along the Iberian peninsula, who had--astoundingly given the time period--crossed into the Americas via the Atlantic ocean. Could not a similar Siberian culture, if not the pre-Clovis people themselves, have displayed equal nautical sophistication?
Even if one subscribes to this line of reasoning, the "Clovis first" school still have an objection: proponents of a pre-Clovis people rely solely on the Monte Verde site in Chile, a site so far south that its location begs yet another question: What of the 6,000 miles of coastline between the ice corridor and Monte Verde? Besides remains found in a network of caves in Oregon, there has been scant evidence of a pre-Clovis people. Nonetheless, Meade and Pizinsky claim that a propitious geologic accident could account for this discrepancy: Monte Verde was located near a peat bog that essentially fossilized the village. Archaeologists uncovered two wooden stakes, which, at one time, were used in twelve huts. Furthermore, plant species associated with areas 150 miles away were found, suggesting a trade network. These findings indicate that the Clovis may not have been the first to people the Americas, yet more excavation, both in Monte Verde and along the coast, must be conducted in order to determine the extent of pre-Clovis settlements in the Americas.
A recent school of thought, backed by Weber, provides the following answer: pre-Clovis people reached the Americas by relying on a sophisticated maritime culture, which allowed them to take advantage of refugia, or small areas in which aquatic life flourished. Thus they were able to make the long journey by hugging the coast as far south as to what is today British Columbia. Additionally, they were believed to have fashioned a primitive form of crampon so that they would be able to dock in these refugia and avail themselves of the microfauna. Still, such a theory begs the question as to how such a culture developed.
The Solutrean theory has been influential in answering this question, a fact that may seem paradoxical--and startling--to those familiar with its line of reasoning: the Clovis people were actually Solutreans, an ancient seafaring culture along the Iberian peninsula, who had--astoundingly given the time period--crossed into the Americas via the Atlantic ocean. Could not a similar Siberian culture, if not the pre-Clovis people themselves, have displayed equal nautical sophistication?
Even if one subscribes to this line of reasoning, the "Clovis first" school still have an objection: proponents of a pre-Clovis people rely solely on the Monte Verde site in Chile, a site so far south that its location begs yet another question: What of the 6,000 miles of coastline between the ice corridor and Monte Verde? Besides remains found in a network of caves in Oregon, there has been scant evidence of a pre-Clovis people. Nonetheless, Meade and Pizinsky claim that a propitious geologic accident could account for this discrepancy: Monte Verde was located near a peat bog that essentially fossilized the village. Archaeologists uncovered two wooden stakes, which, at one time, were used in twelve huts. Furthermore, plant species associated with areas 150 miles away were found, suggesting a trade network. These findings indicate that the Clovis may not have been the first to people the Americas, yet more excavation, both in Monte Verde and along the coast, must be conducted in order to determine the extent of pre-Clovis settlements in the Americas.
In the context in which it appears, the phrase "avail themselves of" most nearly means
A. locate
B. exploit
C. regard
D. fathom
E. distribute
Indicate all that apply
If it is true that a trade network between pre-Clovis people had been established, then which of the following could be expected to be found at settlements near Monte Verde?
A. Other villages that have been preserved in a peat bog
B. Plants species similar to those uncovered at Monte Verde
C. The same number of wooden stakes for supporting dwellings
It can be inferred from the passage that the reason the author finds the Solutrean hypothesis both startling and paradoxical is that
A. ancient cultures were most likely unable to develop such a sophisticated form of maritime transport that they were able to cross the Atlantic
B. it supports the Clovis school of thought, and posits the existence of a capacity not commonly associated with ancient people
C, the Clovis people had crossed from Siberia navigating across a difficult ice corridor, whereas the pre-Clovis people had sailed, with far less difficulty, across the Atlantic ocean
D. it suggests that the pre-Clovis people had a way to circumvent the ice-corridor, yet were unlikely to have traveled as far south as modern day Chile
E. it runs counter to one of the chief tenets of the "Clovis first" school of thought
It can be most reasonably inferred from the passage that in regard to the manner in which the Monte Verde village was preserved that
A. unless evidence of other pre-Clovis people was fossilized the same way it was in Monte Verde, archaeologists will be unable to determine the extent of the settlement of pre-Clovis people
B. major discoveries can sometimes result from random processes in the environment
C. plant species can offer valuable clues into the origin of other pre-Clovis settlements
D. sites dated from slightly after the period of the Clovis people did not offer archaeologists such a trove of information
E. archaeologists are unlikely to find any other significant evidence of pre-Clovis people unless they venture as much as 150 miles from the site
- Part of the project: GRE Hard and Tricky Verbal Practice: NEW Questions Daily - Gain 20 Kudos & Get FREE Access to GRE Prep Club TESTS
- Also replying to the unanswered questions
Re: As to when the first people populated the American subcontinents is ho
[#permalink]
26 Nov 2025, 14:04
26 Nov 2025, 14:04
1
Expert Reply
Question 3
It can be inferred from the passage that the reason the author finds the Solutrean hypothesis both startling and paradoxical is that
The reference is in the third paragraph: "The Solutrean theory has been influential in answering this question, a fact that may seem paradoxical--and startling--to those familiar with its line of reasoning: the Clovis people were actually Solutreans, an ancient seafaring culture along the Iberian peninsula, who had--astoundingly given the time period--crossed into the Americas via the Atlantic ocean."
The hypothesis is startling because they crossed the Atlantic ("astoundingly given the time period"). It is paradoxical because it is used to support a pre-Clovis theory, but it relies on an Atlantic crossing by people who are supposedly the Clovis people. However, the author frames the paradox in the subsequent question: "Could not a similar Siberian culture, if not the preClovis people themselves, have displayed equal nautical sophistication?" The paradox is that the Solutrean theory, which supports the Clovis lineage, provides an answer (maritime sophistication) that undermines the standard "Clovis first" theory by suggesting the pre-Clovis people could have done the same.
Let's evaluate the options against the primary points:
- A. ancient cultures were most likely unable to develop such a sophisticated form of maritime transport that they were able to cross the Atlantic: This explains why it is startling ("astoundingly given the time period"), but not why it is paradoxical.
- B. it supports the Clovis school of thought, and posits the existence of a capacity not commonly associated with ancient people: This is the best synthesis. It supports the Clovis (a key group in the debate) but attributes an astounding new capability (nautical sophistication) to them, which then paradoxically allows the author to ask if the pre-Clovis people could have had the same capability, thus threatening the Clovis-first model.
- C. the Clovis people had crossed from Siberia navigating across a difficult ice corridor, whereas the pre-Clovis people had sailed, with far less difficulty, across the Atlantic ocean: This misstates the theories. The Solutrean theory has Clovis sailing across the Atlantic.
- D. it suggests that the pre-Clovis people had a way to circumvent the ice-corridor, yet were unlikely to have traveled as far south as modern day Chile: Incorrect. The Solutrean theory is about the Clovis.
- E. it runs counter to one of the chief tenets of the "Clovis first" school of thought: While the conclusion used by the author runs counter to the Clovis first theory, the Solutrean theory itself is a theory about the origin of the Clovis people, making it not inherently counter to the school of thought it's meant to explain.
Answer for Question 3: B. it supports the Clovis school of thought, and posits the existence of a capacity not commonly associated with ancient people
It can be inferred from the passage that the reason the author finds the Solutrean hypothesis both startling and paradoxical is that
The reference is in the third paragraph: "The Solutrean theory has been influential in answering this question, a fact that may seem paradoxical--and startling--to those familiar with its line of reasoning: the Clovis people were actually Solutreans, an ancient seafaring culture along the Iberian peninsula, who had--astoundingly given the time period--crossed into the Americas via the Atlantic ocean."
The hypothesis is startling because they crossed the Atlantic ("astoundingly given the time period"). It is paradoxical because it is used to support a pre-Clovis theory, but it relies on an Atlantic crossing by people who are supposedly the Clovis people. However, the author frames the paradox in the subsequent question: "Could not a similar Siberian culture, if not the preClovis people themselves, have displayed equal nautical sophistication?" The paradox is that the Solutrean theory, which supports the Clovis lineage, provides an answer (maritime sophistication) that undermines the standard "Clovis first" theory by suggesting the pre-Clovis people could have done the same.
Let's evaluate the options against the primary points:
- A. ancient cultures were most likely unable to develop such a sophisticated form of maritime transport that they were able to cross the Atlantic: This explains why it is startling ("astoundingly given the time period"), but not why it is paradoxical.
- B. it supports the Clovis school of thought, and posits the existence of a capacity not commonly associated with ancient people: This is the best synthesis. It supports the Clovis (a key group in the debate) but attributes an astounding new capability (nautical sophistication) to them, which then paradoxically allows the author to ask if the pre-Clovis people could have had the same capability, thus threatening the Clovis-first model.
- C. the Clovis people had crossed from Siberia navigating across a difficult ice corridor, whereas the pre-Clovis people had sailed, with far less difficulty, across the Atlantic ocean: This misstates the theories. The Solutrean theory has Clovis sailing across the Atlantic.
- D. it suggests that the pre-Clovis people had a way to circumvent the ice-corridor, yet were unlikely to have traveled as far south as modern day Chile: Incorrect. The Solutrean theory is about the Clovis.
- E. it runs counter to one of the chief tenets of the "Clovis first" school of thought: While the conclusion used by the author runs counter to the Clovis first theory, the Solutrean theory itself is a theory about the origin of the Clovis people, making it not inherently counter to the school of thought it's meant to explain.
Answer for Question 3: B. it supports the Clovis school of thought, and posits the existence of a capacity not commonly associated with ancient people
Re: As to when the first people populated the American subcontinents is ho
[#permalink]
26 Nov 2025, 14:02
26 Nov 2025, 14:02
Expert Reply
Question 1
In the context in which it appears, the phrase "avail themselves of" most nearly means
The phrase appears in the second paragraph: "Additionally, they were believed to have fashioned a primitive form of crampon so that they would be able to dock in these refugia and avail themselves of the microfauna."
To "avail oneself of" something means to use or take advantage of it. The pre-Clovis people would use the microfauna (small aquatic life) as a food source.
- A. locate (Find) - Too general.
- B. exploit (Make full use of and benefit from) - This fits the idea of taking advantage of the microfauna for sustenance.
- C. regard (Consider or look at) - Incorrect.
- D. fathom (Understand deeply) - Incorrect.
- E. distribute (Spread out) - Incorrect.
Answer for Question 1: B. exploit
In the context in which it appears, the phrase "avail themselves of" most nearly means
The phrase appears in the second paragraph: "Additionally, they were believed to have fashioned a primitive form of crampon so that they would be able to dock in these refugia and avail themselves of the microfauna."
To "avail oneself of" something means to use or take advantage of it. The pre-Clovis people would use the microfauna (small aquatic life) as a food source.
- A. locate (Find) - Too general.
- B. exploit (Make full use of and benefit from) - This fits the idea of taking advantage of the microfauna for sustenance.
- C. regard (Consider or look at) - Incorrect.
- D. fathom (Understand deeply) - Incorrect.
- E. distribute (Spread out) - Incorrect.
Answer for Question 1: B. exploit
