Last visit was: 21 Nov 2024, 18:06 It is currently 21 Nov 2024, 18:06

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30003
Own Kudos [?]: 36341 [10]
Given Kudos: 25927
Send PM
avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 19 May 2020
Posts: 74
Own Kudos [?]: 192 [3]
Given Kudos: 0
GRE 1: Q160 V163
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30003
Own Kudos [?]: 36341 [0]
Given Kudos: 25927
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 01 Dec 2018
Posts: 87
Own Kudos [?]: 35 [0]
Given Kudos: 38
Send PM
Re: By 1950, the results of attempts to relate brain processes t [#permalink]
Carcass

Could you please help me with the first question?

21. The author suggests that, by 1950, attempts to correlate mental experience with brain processes would probably have been viewed with
(C) pessimism
correct:
By 1950, the results of attempts to relate brain processes to mental experience appeared rather discouraging

If they are asking "attempts to correlate mental experience with brain processes would probably have been viewed with" then if the results were discouraging then the attempt before the result must be seen as the opposite of discouraging, isn´t it?

Kind regards!
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30003
Own Kudos [?]: 36341 [1]
Given Kudos: 25927
Send PM
Re: By 1950, the results of attempts to relate brain processes t [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
Well

what you assumed is NOT necessarily true. In some rare cases, you can do that or solve a question only reading the system and the answer choices and nOT the passage whatsoever.

However, as a general rule 99.99% percent of the time you have to read the passage. Not only the sentence that could leads you to the solution but just the ENTIRE passage. Understand the whole picture.

By 1950, the results of attempts to relate brain processes to mental experience appeared rather discouraging. Such variations in size, shape, chemistry, conduction speed, excitation threshold, and the like as had been demonstrated in nerve cells remained negligible in significance for any possible correlation with the manifold dimensions of mental experience.

Near the turn of the century, it had been suggested by Hering that different modes of sensation, such as pain, taste, and color, might be correlated with the discharge of specific kinds of nervous energy. However, subsequently developed methods of recording and analyzing nerve potentials failed to reveal any such qualitative diversity.


As such there is a pessimism or concern

Key points

Understand the full passage
Connecting the dots
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2021
Posts: 30
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [0]
Given Kudos: 25
Send PM
Re: By 1950, the results of attempts to relate brain processes t [#permalink]
Can someone explain or paraphrase the last paragraph? I have trouble understanding it.
"However, cortical locus, in itself, turned out to have little explanatory value. Studies showed that sensations as diverse as those of red, black, green, and white, or touch, cold, warmth, movement, pain, posture, and pressure apparently may arise through activation of the same cortical areas. What seemed to remain was some kind of differential patterning effects in the brain excitation: it is the difference in the central distribution of impulses that counts. In short, brain theory suggested a correlation between mental experience and the activity of relatively homogeneous nerve-cell units conducting essentially homogeneous impUlses, through homogeneous cerebral tissue. To match the multiple dimensions of mental experience psychologists could only point to a limitless variation in the spatiotemporal patterning of nerve impulses."
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30003
Own Kudos [?]: 36341 [2]
Given Kudos: 25927
Send PM
By 1950, the results of attempts to relate brain processes t [#permalink]
2
Expert Reply
However, cortical locus, in itself, turned out to have little explanatory value.

The cortical locus or spot or place where it is located in our brain is not so relevant.


Studies showed that sensations as diverse as those of red, black, green, and white, or touch, cold, warmth, movement, pain, posture, and pressure apparently may arise through activation of the same cortical areas.

All the sensations above could be activated by the same cortical locus. Therefore, if it is positioned in the front of our brain or in the back is not so important

What seemed to remain was some kind of differential patterning effects in the brain excitation: it is the difference in the central distribution of impulses that counts. In short, brain theory suggested a correlation between mental experience and the activity of relatively homogeneous nerve-cell units conducting essentially homogeneous impUlses, through homogeneous cerebral tissue. To match the multiple dimensions of mental experience psychologists could only point to a limitless variation in the spatiotemporal patterning of nerve impulses.

Last part is pretty tough in its wording

The last piece we have to study more is the following: once we have established that the cortical locus is irrelevant we have to understand better the excitation in our brain and its unfolding or patterns.

we do have a correlation or a bond between mental experience and the activity of nerve cells. But this is still unclear because the correlation unfolds via patterns but we saw a limitless of this pattern so the entire process is still not clear: we do know that we have patters but is still unclear how many and how these generate
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Apr 2022
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [1]
Given Kudos: 12
Send PM
Re: By 1950, the results of attempts to relate brain processes t [#permalink]
1
24. According to the passage, some evidence exists that the area of the cortex activated by a sensory stimulus determines which of the following?
I. The nature of the nerve impulse
No where in the passage its mentioned about the nature of the nerve impulse.

II. The modality of the sensory experience
correct

In one experiment, when an electric stimulus was applied...
III. Qualitative differences within a modality
Not supported by the passage

25. The passage can most accurately be described as a discussion concerning historical views of the

(A) anatomy of the brain- incorrect
In the passage, author of the passage not really focused complete analysis of the rather author focused on the mental experiences.
(B) manner in which nerve impulses are conducted- eliminated
This is not the focus of the passage.
(C) significance of different cortical areas in mental experience
This is just a part of the explanations of the author.
(D) mechanics of sense perception
Sense perception is too narrow.
(E) physiological correlates of mental experience
correct- This is the theme of passage.

I initially, answered Question 25 wrong, but with the POE option is best option among all the other options.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Dec 2019
Posts: 190
Own Kudos [?]: 132 [0]
Given Kudos: 59
Send PM
Re: By 1950, the results of attempts to relate brain processes t [#permalink]
Do an RC have 7 questions in GRE or the passage is this big or is it for our practice. Because it is time consuming and difficult to grasp lot of details
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Aug 2023
Posts: 29
Own Kudos [?]: 39 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: By 1950, the results of attempts to relate brain processes t [#permalink]
1
Summary

Para 1: experiment to see whether the different sensation have different intensity of nerve impulse failed . It was seen as a disappointment

Para 2: 1st theory it is the quality that differ with different sensation, then a better theory came that it was different part of the brain that give impulses for different sensation
Like auditory nerves gives the sensation of seeing

Para 3: for cortex area, different sensation is sensed with different pattern of impulses

A1: (B) - because the author was disappointed
A2: (A) - Nerve impulse are homogeneous
A3: (D) - mental experience linked with cerebral cortex activation - para 3
A4: I and III are wrong because nerve impulse are homogeneous and there quality of the impulse theory was disregarded
A6: (D) through different cortex produces sensation to different parts, but could not explain different mental experience as it came from cerebral cortex
A7: (B) -
A - nerve cell increase
D & E - are same and they do also change
C - different cortex areas - different sensation
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30003
Own Kudos [?]: 36341 [0]
Given Kudos: 25927
Send PM
Re: By 1950, the results of attempts to relate brain processes t [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Midhilesh489 wrote:
Do an RC have 7 questions in GRE or the passage is this big or is it for our practice. Because it is time consuming and difficult to grasp lot of details


No more. in the GRE of today the long èassage will have at the very most 4 questions
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: By 1950, the results of attempts to relate brain processes t [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
234 posts
GRE Instructor
1065 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne