Last visit was: 23 Nov 2024, 14:15 It is currently 23 Nov 2024, 14:15

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30012
Own Kudos [?]: 36366 [3]
Given Kudos: 25928
Send PM
Most Helpful Community Reply
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 03 Dec 2019
Posts: 348
Own Kudos [?]: 956 [9]
Given Kudos: 0
General Discussion
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30012
Own Kudos [?]: 36366 [2]
Given Kudos: 25928
Send PM
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 03 Dec 2019
Posts: 348
Own Kudos [?]: 956 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Re: Historians have long recognized the traditional Japanese swo [#permalink]
1
asmasattar00 wrote:
Carcass wrote:
if you do need explanations of the questions, please reply to this same discussion.

We reply in 24h.

Regards

kindly give the explanations for Q# 2,3,6 and 7
for Q 6 why we not choose ""classically regarded as artists, mastersmiths nevertheless exerted great care in the process of creating swords, no two of which were ever forged exactly the sameway"" as in the last line of this sentence it is mentioned that no two of which were ever forged exactly the sameway.

Q#7 why we choose option C as in last line of the passage it is mentioned that Japanese sword is valued as much for its artistic merit as for its historical significance.



See above for explanation.

For question 6, the line you pointed out actually starts with "NOT classically regarded as artists, mastersmiths nevertheless "

And for 7, this view is the current view and not the historical view.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30012
Own Kudos [?]: 36366 [1]
Given Kudos: 25928
Send PM
Re: Historians have long recognized the traditional Japanese swo [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
QUESTION #2


For an EXCEPT question (almost always a Specific question), use the process of elimination to cross out those details mentioned in the passage. ​(A) ​In the passage, this unique signature is referred to as a “structural signature” in the fifth sentence. ​(B) ​The fifth sentence mentions the “secret forging techniques” used by each smith. ​(C) ​The first sentence indicates that “the traditional Japanese sword … has even been considered a spiritual entity.” ​(D) ​CORRECT. The time and effort master smiths devote to making a sword is discussed, and the passage does indicate that the Japanese sword is valued for its artistic merit. However, the passage does not state that major historians consider master smiths themselves to be artists. Major historians are not referenced in the passage. Moreover, who values the Japanese sword for its artistic merit is not mentioned. (E) ​In the last sentence, the passage indicates that “the Japanese sword is valued as much for its artistic merit as for its historical significance.”
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30012
Own Kudos [?]: 36366 [1]
Given Kudos: 25928
Send PM
Re: Historians have long recognized the traditional Japanese swo [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
QUESTION #4

The author states that “each smith’s secret forging techniques left an idiosyncratic structural signature.” The words idiosyncratic and signature imply the uniqueness of the smith’s process. Be careful not to infer any additional information, particularly when the question refers to a specific sentence or phrase. ​(A) ​In the passage, such an inscription is referred to as a “physical signature,” not a “structural signature.” ​(B) ​CORRECT. Note that the proof sentence indicates that each smith had his own process, and so the “structural signature” was unique to each smith (not necessarily to each individual blade). ​(C) ​This statement seems reasonable. However, the passage does not say whether all master smiths are currently “known.” Certain swords with a “structural signature” may be of unknown origin. ​(D) ​The second sentence mentions the saying “the sword is the soul of the samurai,” but you are not told that the “structural signature” was the aspect of the sword reflecting the soul of the samurai who wielded it. The second paragraph explains that the sword “reflected the smith’s personal honor and devotion to craft.” This statement, however, does not justify the claim that the structural signature itself reflects the soul of the samurai who wielded it. ​(E) ​The passage does not discuss the shape of any Japanese blade.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30012
Own Kudos [?]: 36366 [1]
Given Kudos: 25928
Send PM
Re: Historians have long recognized the traditional Japanese swo [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
QUESTION #5

To determine the function(s) of any part of a passage, pay attention to the emphasized content of that part, in particular any reiterated points, and to the relationship that part has to other portions of the passage. In this case, the description of the forging process extends the idea introduced earlier that the Japanese sword is revered. ​(A) ​The final sentence mentions that Japanese swords are now appreciated more for their artistic merit, but no explanation as to why is provided. ​(B) ​The words “historical significance” close the passage, but the description of the forging process fails to explain or outline that significance. ​(C) ​CORRECT. The description of the forging process underscores the uniqueness of individual Japanese swords. One sentence mentions that “no two [swords] were ever forged in exactly the same way.” Later, “structural signature” and “unique finished product” reinforce this point. ​(D) ​The passage explains that master smiths were not considered artists in the classical sense, and then goes on to point out the painstaking creation of each sword. This implicitly draws a parallel between the creation of the sword and classical artistry. However, the passage does not actually describe or discuss classical artists, nor does it set forth criteria for classical artists. There is no actual comparison to classical artists, despite the mention of “artistic merit.” This answer choice goes too far beyond the passage. ​(E) ​Elements of the forging process are discussed, but the “complete” process of making a Japanese sword, such as making the handle, polishing the blade, etc., is not discussed in the paragraph. ​​
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30012
Own Kudos [?]: 36366 [1]
Given Kudos: 25928
Send PM
Re: Historians have long recognized the traditional Japanese swo [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
QUESTION #6


The passage first mentions the idea of art in the third sentence, but indicates that master smiths were not regarded as artists. After describing the meticulous forging process, the last sentence indicates that each sword is “unique” and is valued for its “artistic merit.” The last sentence, then, best indicates that the author would consider these swords works of art.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30012
Own Kudos [?]: 36366 [1]
Given Kudos: 25928
Send PM
Re: Historians have long recognized the traditional Japanese swo [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
QUESTION #7


(A), (B), and (C): This is a General question of the Select-One-or-More variety. Tackle each answer choice as its own question. ​A. ​CORRECT. The second-to-last sentence says that “each smith’s secret forging techniques left an idiosyncratic structural signature.” This structural signature, then, could possibly be used to determine the creator of a given sword, even in the absence of a physical signature. ​B​. CORRECT. The first sentence tells you that the Japanese sword “has even been considered a spiritual entity.” In other words, it has been viewed in terms other than the strictly material. ​C​. CORRECT. The last sentence tells you that “today, the Japanese sword is valued as much for its artistic merit as for its historical significance.” Earlier in the passage, however, you were told that master smiths were “not classically regarded as artists.” This means that those smiths viewed as artists today did not always receive the same recognition and neither did the swords they made.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30012
Own Kudos [?]: 36366 [0]
Given Kudos: 25928
Send PM
Re: Historians have long recognized the traditional Japanese swo [#permalink]
Expert Reply
if you do need explanations of the questions, please reply to this same discussion.

We reply in 24h.

Regards
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Mar 2020
Posts: 41
Own Kudos [?]: 25 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Historians have long recognized the traditional Japanese swo [#permalink]
Carcass wrote:
if you do need explanations of the questions, please reply to this same discussion.

We reply in 24h.

Regards

kindly give the explanations for Q# 2,3,6 and 7
for Q 6 why we not choose ""classically regarded as artists, mastersmiths nevertheless exerted great care in the process of creating swords, no two of which were ever forged exactly the sameway"" as in the last line of this sentence it is mentioned that no two of which were ever forged exactly the sameway.

Q#7 why we choose option C as in last line of the passage it is mentioned that Japanese sword is valued as much for its artistic merit as for its historical significance.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Sep 2020
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Historians have long recognized the traditional Japanese swo [#permalink]
For question 7 can you elaborate on how the passage stating that smiths were never considered as artists is sufficient to extrapolate that assumption to Japanese Swords?
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Apr 2021
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Historians have long recognized the traditional Japanese swo [#permalink]
Q.7.
How is 'A' correct? The technique that gave unique characteristic(s) to the sword was a secret for each smith then how it can be traced back?
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Feb 2022
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 8
Send PM
Re: Historians have long recognized the traditional Japanese swo [#permalink]
jimmychirayil1 wrote:
For question 7 can you elaborate on how the passage stating that smiths were never considered as artists is sufficient to extrapolate that assumption to Japanese Swords?

I have the same question, how can you determine an art's reverence by it's artist's historical treatment?
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30012
Own Kudos [?]: 36366 [0]
Given Kudos: 25928
Send PM
Re: Historians have long recognized the traditional Japanese swo [#permalink]
Expert Reply
QUESTION #1

To identify the primary purpose of the passage, examine the passage as a whole. Avoid answer choices that address only limited sections of the passage. The Point of the passage (the Japanese sword has been considered not just a fine weapon but a spiritual entity) is clearly established in the first two sentences; the purpose of the passage is to explain and support that Point. ​(A) ​The passage does not call into question the admiration that historians have for the Japanese sword. ​(B) ​The middle of the passage discusses forging techniques, but none of the information is presented as new. Moreover, these forging techniques are not the overall focus of the passage. ​(C) ​The Japanese sword is not identified as an ephemeral (passing) work of art in the passage. ​(D) ​Japanese sword makers were indeed motivated by honor, at least in part, according to the last sentence, but this is not the overall purpose of the passage, much of which describes the Japanese sword’s physical properties and reasons for its importance. ​(E) ​CORRECT. The passage as a whole describes the immense value of the Japanese sword to both the samurai (the sword’s owner) and the smith (its maker). The saying “the sword is the soul of the samurai” is referenced early to indicate this importance. Later portions of the passage detail the tremendous effort that is put into each sword, reflecting the importance of each one.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30012
Own Kudos [?]: 36366 [0]
Given Kudos: 25928
Send PM
Re: Historians have long recognized the traditional Japanese swo [#permalink]
Expert Reply
TalinM22 wrote:
jimmychirayil1 wrote:
For question 7 can you elaborate on how the passage stating that smiths were never considered as artists is sufficient to extrapolate that assumption to Japanese Swords?

I have the same question, how can you determine an art's reverence by it's artist's historical treatment?


See the above explanation about the 7th question

Let me know if you need further clarification about.

I will explain further

regards
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Jan 2021
Posts: 1723
Own Kudos [?]: 53 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Historians have long recognized the traditional Japanese swo [#permalink]
Hello from the GRE Prep Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GRE Prep Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: Historians have long recognized the traditional Japanese swo [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
234 posts
GRE Instructor
1065 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne