Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 01:41 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 01:41

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 28633
Own Kudos [?]: 33114 [1]
Given Kudos: 25174
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 20 Jun 2019
Posts: 181
Own Kudos [?]: 220 [0]
Given Kudos: 41
GRE 1: Q160 V161

GRE 2: Q165 V159
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Jun 2018
Posts: 23
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 28633
Own Kudos [?]: 33114 [0]
Given Kudos: 25174
Send PM
Re: Implementing extensive wireless networks in cities would be [#permalink]
Expert Reply
This is a question in which we have to reinforce our argument for some reason.

Implementing extensive wireless networks in cities would be a practical way to meet the needs of city households, schools, and businesses. Rural communities have found that wireless networks are both more reliable and cheaper than land-based networks.


D is tempting but we do not know anything about a skyscraper or other buildings and the relative expenses. Moreover, we do not know if in rural areas we do not have buildings AT ALL.

Ask for further assistance if you do need.

Regards
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Oct 2019
Posts: 114
Own Kudos [?]: 59 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Implementing extensive wireless networks in cities would be [#permalink]
why not B?
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Feb 2020
Posts: 496
Own Kudos [?]: 334 [0]
Given Kudos: 299
Send PM
Re: Implementing extensive wireless networks in cities would be [#permalink]
POORVIBANSAL wrote:
why not B?


It cant be B because B says "Wireless networks work far better where population density is low" means villages/small towns. This statement is not supporting wireless network for cities whereas argument says that cities need wireless network as well. Hence only option A holds.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 26 Jun 2020
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Implementing extensive wireless networks in cities would be [#permalink]
(A) Urban areas do not pose additional problems for the effective operation of wireless networks. - Correct, assumption is it will be as effective in urban as rural & there is no difference between both these areas
(B) Wireless networks work far better where population density is low. - Irrelevant - no where do we speak about population density
(C) Iceland, a very rural country, successfully uses wireless networks. - Out of scope
(D) The expense of wireless transmission in areas with large buildings is much higher than in areas without such buildings. - Irrelevant we talk about urban/rural not large/small building
(E) Poor neighborhoods have less access to internet services than do educators or businesses.- Irrelevant as this has nothing to do with urban/rural comparison
Prep Club for GRE Bot
[#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Instructor
218 posts
GRE Instructor
1029 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne