Re: In December 2010, the Federation Internationale de Football Associatio
[#permalink]
11 Jul 2025, 02:43
EXPLANATION QUESTION #2
I. FIFA is likely to face criticism and come under scrutiny in the following months.
- The passage states: "Immediately, a swirl of controversy surrounded the decision, which followed previous allegations that certain FIFA members had accepted monetary bribes in exchange for their bid votes."
- It also mentions: "Soccer fans questioned how Qatar was able to win the bidding process..."
- The passage details various controversies (bribes, heat, discriminatory legislation, alcohol policy, building venues from scratch).
- The phrase "a swirl of controversy surrounded the decision" strongly suggests ongoing and future criticism and scrutiny. The decision was just announced in December 2010, and the World Cup is in 2022, leaving a long period for this controversy to continue and intensify.
- This statement is suggested by the passage.
II. The country of Qatar is likely to change in some ways as a result of hosting the 2022 World Cup.
- The passage states: "Additionally, Qatar would have to build venues for the event from scratch."
- Building venues from scratch implies significant construction and infrastructure development, which would fundamentally change aspects of the country.
- While the passage doesn't explicitly state social or political changes, the necessity of building venues and hosting a massive international event strongly suggests physical and logistical changes to the country.
- This statement is suggested by the passage.
III. The choice of Qatar to host the 2022 World Cup is enough evidence to abolish FIFA and replace it.
- The passage details controversies and allegations against FIFA, such as "allegations that certain FIFA members had accepted monetary bribes."
- However, the passage reports these allegations and controversies; it does not make a definitive judgment that they constitute "enough evidence to abolish FIFA and replace it." This is a very strong and extreme conclusion that the author does not draw or suggest. The author presents the facts of the controversy, not a call for FIFA's abolition.
- This statement is not suggested by the passage.
Therefore, statements I and II are suggested by the passage.
The final answer is I and II.