Last visit was: 28 Apr 2024, 20:29 It is currently 28 Apr 2024, 20:29

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 28661
Own Kudos [?]: 33155 [14]
Given Kudos: 25179
Send PM
Most Helpful Community Reply
avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 19 May 2020
Posts: 74
Own Kudos [?]: 191 [6]
Given Kudos: 0
GRE 1: Q160 V163
Send PM
General Discussion
GRE Instructor
Joined: 24 Dec 2018
Posts: 1029
Own Kudos [?]: 1360 [3]
Given Kudos: 24
Send PM
GRE Instructor
Joined: 24 Dec 2018
Posts: 1029
Own Kudos [?]: 1360 [2]
Given Kudos: 24
Send PM
Re: Many literary detectives have pored over a great puzzle conc [#permalink]
2
JobHunterGarou wrote:
I have a problem with 26.
I answered C.

relevant lines in the passage
starting from Line 10:
Quote:
Fallois proposed that Proust had tried to
begin a novel in 1908, abandoned it for what was to be
a long demonstration of Saint-Beuve's blindness to the
real nature of great writing, found the essay giving rise
to personal memories and fictional developments, and
allowed these to take over in a steadily developing novel


Doesn't this mean that Proust was writing the novel in 1908 to get back at the critic St-Bv dude? Or am I missing something? :?
Doesn't this answer option C? I get that E is definitely correct. But why not C?

Here is the question again for lookup:
26. The passage offers information to answer which of
the following questions?
(A) Precisely when in 1909 did Proust decide to
abandon Contre Saint-Beuve?
(B) Precisely when In 1909 did Proust decide to
connect the beginning and the end of
Remembrance of Things Past?
(C) What was the subject of the novel that Proust
attempted in 1908 ?
(D) What specific criticisms of Saint-Beuve appear,
in fictional fonn, in Remembrance of Things
Past?
(E) What is a theme concerning art that appears in
the final book of Remembrance of Things
Past?


Choice C states:

What was the subject of the novel that Proust attempted in 1908?

Now the relevant lines below (highlighted in red) do not tell us the subject of the novel he tried to begin and subsequently abandoned.

Fallois proposed that Proust had tried to
begin a novel in 1908, abandoned it
for what was to be
a long demonstration of Saint-Beuve's blindness to the
real nature of great writing, found the essay giving rise
to personal memories and fictional developments, and
allowed these to take over in a steadily developing novel
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Aug 2023
Posts: 29
Own Kudos [?]: 39 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Many literary detectives have pored over a great puzzle conc [#permalink]
1
Summary:
Para 1: proust wrote novel from essay
Para 2: used memories subconsciously to write the novel
Para 3: critics speculating the start time of novel

21: (B) literary elements were concerned throughout the passage when the novel began and how
22: (E) Vallet only role in the passage was to receive messages from the proust
23: (A) Only II is correct
24 (C) The author was confident with Fallios deduction as given in para 1 but wasn’t happy with lack of detailing of the origin of the novel
25: (C)
26: (E) - para 3, (D). Is a trap answer, though the novel was built from the essay, the passage contains the specific criticism
27: (D) - proust memories flashback came from criticising the essay and that’s how the novel was built
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 28661
Own Kudos [?]: 33155 [0]
Given Kudos: 25179
Send PM
Re: Many literary detectives have pored over a great puzzle conc [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Post A Detailed Correct Solution For The Above Questions And Get A Kudos.
Question From Our New Project: Great Opportunity To Earn Kudos!!!
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Jan 2020
Posts: 112
Own Kudos [?]: 272 [0]
Given Kudos: 97
Send PM
Re: Many literary detectives have pored over a great puzzle conc [#permalink]
I know someone already answered but I'd like to hear other perspectives in more details as to how we can eliminate D for question 21

Essentially, how do you eliminate D for Q21?
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 28661
Own Kudos [?]: 33155 [0]
Given Kudos: 25179
Send PM
Re: Many literary detectives have pored over a great puzzle conc [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Many literary detectives have pored over a great puzzle concerning the writer Marcel Proust: what happened in 1909 ? How did Contre Saint-Beuve, an essay attacking the methods of the critic SaintBeuve turn into the start of the novel Remembrance of Things Past?

Draft passages in Proust's 1909 notebooks indicate that the transition from essay to novel began in Contre Saint-Beuve,

B) evidence concerning the genesis of Proust's novel Remembrance of Things Past

from the above sentences, we do have a genesis

D) Proust's correspondence and what it reveals about Remembrance of Things Past

this is just part of the story not the whole picture

Hope this helsp
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Sep 2023
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 16
Send PM
Many literary detectives have pored over a great puzzle conc [#permalink]
I have a problem with 26.
I answered C.

relevant lines in the passage
starting from Line 10:
Quote:
Fallois proposed that Proust had tried to
begin a novel in 1908, abandoned it for what was to be
a long demonstration of Saint-Beuve's blindness to the
real nature of great writing, found the essay giving rise
to personal memories and fictional developments, and
allowed these to take over in a steadily developing novel


Doesn't this mean that Proust was writing the novel in 1908 to get back at the critic St-Bv dude? Or am I missing something? :?
Doesn't this answer option C? I get that E is definitely correct. But why not C?

Here is the question again for lookup:
26. The passage offers information to answer which of
the following questions?
(A) Precisely when in 1909 did Proust decide to
abandon Contre Saint-Beuve?
(B) Precisely when In 1909 did Proust decide to
connect the beginning and the end of
Remembrance of Things Past?
(C) What was the subject of the novel that Proust
attempted in 1908 ?
(D) What specific criticisms of Saint-Beuve appear,
in fictional fonn, in Remembrance of Things
Past?
(E) What is a theme concerning art that appears in
the final book of Remembrance of Things
Past?
Prep Club for GRE Bot
[#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Instructor
218 posts
GRE Instructor
1029 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne