Last visit was: 21 Nov 2024, 07:05 It is currently 21 Nov 2024, 07:05

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 29999
Own Kudos [?]: 36332 [3]
Given Kudos: 25923
Send PM
Most Helpful Community Reply
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 May 2020
Posts: 38
Own Kudos [?]: 49 [7]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
General Discussion
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 Aug 2023
Posts: 29
Own Kudos [?]: 39 [2]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 29999
Own Kudos [?]: 36332 [1]
Given Kudos: 25923
Send PM
Re: Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the O [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
The third question is tricky

In general, the assumption is that even if some areas are flooded the crops can be re-located or replanted in other areas unless the lack of the coordination of the central government. In other words, if the gov is strong even the replacement of the crops is doable.

A ,instead, says that the crops cannot be planted in another area government or not assistance. Regardless of its intervention or not. In other words, in A the government (positive or negative action it could have) is not considered.

Instead, we do know from the passage that IF the government was strong and capable the crops could be replanted.

Hope this helps.

Regards
Retired Moderator
Joined: 29 Mar 2020
Posts: 140
Own Kudos [?]: 330 [3]
Given Kudos: 24
Send PM
Most scholarship into the sudden disappearance of the Olmec civilizati [#permalink]
1
2
Bookmarks
Most scholarship into the sudden disappearance of the Olmec civilization 2,500 years ago has focused on the change in meteorological conditions favorable to subsistence crops. Much of this research, though, has overlooked the role that changing geography, most notably the course of rivers, played. The Coatzacoalcos River, the main river passing through La Venta, could have had notable tributaries diverted as a result of climate change, leading to not only severe flooding in certain areas, but also to a lack of sufficient water for subsistence crops planted near the erstwhile alluvial plain. Such a view, however, fails to account for the resilience of a people capable of transferring crops and moving settlements as need be. What was more likely responsible for the downfall of the Olmec civilization was internal dissent brought on by ecological change, since a leadership unable to control events was likely to be perceived as weak. Without the central governance needed to adapt crop subsistence patterns, the Olmec likely became a collection of feuding clans and thus within a few generations all but disappeared.

1. Which of the following best describes the primary function of the third sentence (“The Coatzacoalcos…plain”)?

A) To call into question information mentioned in the sentence that immediately precedes it.
B) To introduce the role meteorological conditions played in the change in crop subsistence patterns.
C) To highlight evidence offered up by most scholarship on the disappearance of the Olmec.
D) To provide a specific example supporting a hypothesis that differs from that mentioned in the first sentence.
E) To indicate how major geographical changes affected the Olmec’s ability to govern effectively.



Consider each of the choices separately and select all that apply.


2. Which of the following is an assumption the author of the passage makes?

A) The crops displaced by the flooding of the Coatzacoalcos River would not be viable if replanted in areas unaffected by flooding.
B) Adapting crop subsistence involves some level of central governance.
C) Feuding clans are not capable of sustaining a viable population in the wake of ecological catastrophe.


3. Which of the following, if true, would best undermine the theory the author of the passage provides for the sudden disappearance of the Olmec?

A) Much of the flooding that resulted came not from any diverted tributaries but by rainfall that intensified over the course of a decade.
B) Not all the major subsistence crops were planted along the Coatzacoalcos River.
C) Internal dissent was long offered as a theory for the disappearance of the Mayans, but in recent years there is near unanimous agreement that the disappearance was mostly caused by meteorological phenomenon.
D) The Olmec split into two groups that warred persistently for several decades before both succumbed to meteorological changes that made settlement of the area virtually impossible.
E) The Olmec leadership successfully relocated settlements near one of the new tributaries of Coatzacoalcos, yet years of constant flooding precluded the growth of subsistence crops.

Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 29999
Own Kudos [?]: 36332 [1]
Given Kudos: 25923
Send PM
Re: Most scholarship into the sudden disappearance of the Olmec civilizati [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
forwet wrote:
tapas3016 could you please edit the Question #2 to add the information that it is a multiple answer question. Thanks!


Done
avatar
Active Member
Active Member
Joined: 29 May 2018
Posts: 126
Own Kudos [?]: 151 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the O [#permalink]
Hi Carcass,

Took 5:52 mins :( , is this timing more ?

For question 2: First people mentioned that it is due to meteorological change and then the actual reason was river flooding. Since the first reason is changed by the latter and for the same option D is correct. Is my understanding is correct ?
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 29999
Own Kudos [?]: 36332 [0]
Given Kudos: 25923
Send PM
Re: Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the O [#permalink]
Expert Reply
The timing is fairly accurate

As for the second question, the reason is pretty straight

Quote:
Much of this research, though, has overlooked the role that changing geography, most notably the course of rivers, played. The Coatzacoalcos River, the main river passing through La Venta, could have had notable tributaries diverted as a result of climate change, leading not only to severe flooding in certain areas, but also to a lack of sufficient water for subsistence crops planted near the erstwhile alluvial plain. Such a view, however, fails to account for the resilience of a people capable of transferring crops


The highlighted portions of the text above clearly show you that what is in the middle is an example to show something.

D is the answer.

Hope this helps

Regards
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Dec 2018
Posts: 30
Own Kudos [?]: 20 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the O [#permalink]
Question 2:
I chose B. Nevertheless, I misread the first sentence. According to the passage, it seems that the first sentence mentioned that scholars have always been interested in studying favorable meteorological changes, while the sentence in question is an example of unfavorable meteorological changes? Still confused why A cannot be an option for question 3.

To question 3, however,
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 29999
Own Kudos [?]: 36332 [0]
Given Kudos: 25923
Send PM
Re: Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the O [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Sorry maile90, I don't get which question you did not understand.

Could you please clarify me ?? :(

thanks
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 Nov 2018
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the O [#permalink]
Hi

can you please help me to understand why A is wrong for 3rd question?
THe author states that "The Coatzacoalcos River ... could have had notable tributaries diverted as a result of climate change, leading ... to severe flooding in certain areas..."
Thus the author considers that floodings affected crops. Why not to plant crop somewhere else then? Probably, crop could not survive in other areas.
He finally refutes the hypothesis but he apparently did an assumption that crops cannot live anywhere else but near the river.
where is the flaw?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2020
Posts: 440
Own Kudos [?]: 61 [0]
Given Kudos: 68
Send PM
Re: Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the O [#permalink]
6-7 min for above passage 3/3 correct, is this time good enough?
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 29999
Own Kudos [?]: 36332 [0]
Given Kudos: 25923
Send PM
Re: Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the O [#permalink]
Expert Reply
It is good

see my time management guide

https://gre.myprepclub.com/forum/gre-time- ... tml#p60379

Regards
Intern
Intern
Joined: 23 Nov 2020
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 73
Send PM
Re: Most scholarship into the sudden disappearance of the Olmec civilizati [#permalink]
tapas3016 could you please edit the Question #2 to add the information that it is a multiple answer question. Thanks!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2020
Posts: 440
Own Kudos [?]: 61 [0]
Given Kudos: 68
Send PM
Re: Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the O [#permalink]
for question 1, why option E not B
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 29999
Own Kudos [?]: 36332 [0]
Given Kudos: 25923
Send PM
Re: Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the O [#permalink]
Expert Reply
These are the real reason for the disappearance of the Olmec Empire

Such a view, however, fails to account for the resilience of a people capable of transferring crops and moving settlements as need be. What was more likely responsible for the downfall of the Olmec civilization was internal dissent brought on by ecological change, since a leadership unable to control events was likely to be perceived as weak. Without the central governance needed to adapt crop subsistence patterns, the Olmec likely became a collection of feuding clans and within a few generations all but disappeared.

Basically, the reason is: the truth was they failed to transfer crops. The leadership was unable to solve the problem, The unrest took place.

Therefore, the governance was unable and weak

Which of the following, if true, would best undermine the theory the author of the passage provides for the sudden disappearance of the Olmec?

The Olmec leadership successfully relocated settlements near one of the new tributaries of Coatzacoalcos, yet years of constant flooding precluded the growth of subsistence crops.

E is the answer
Retired Moderator
Joined: 09 Jan 2021
Posts: 576
Own Kudos [?]: 846 [0]
Given Kudos: 194
GRE 1: Q167 V156
GPA: 4
WE:Analyst (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Re: Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the O [#permalink]
tapas3016 wrote:
Most scholarship into the sudden disappearance of the Olmec civilization 2,500 years ago has focused on the change in meteorological conditions favorable to subsistence crops. Much of this research, though, has overlooked the role that changing geography, most notably the course of rivers, played. The Coatzacoalcos River, the main river passing through La Venta, could have had notable tributaries diverted as a result of climate change, leading to not only severe flooding in certain areas, but also to a lack of sufficient water for subsistence crops planted near the erstwhile alluvial plain. Such a view, however, fails to account for the resilience of a people capable of transferring crops and moving settlements as need be. What was more likely responsible for the downfall of the Olmec civilization was internal dissent brought on by ecological change, since a leadership unable to control events was likely to be perceived as weak. Without the central governance needed to adapt crop subsistence patterns, the Olmec likely became a collection of feuding clans and thus within a few generations all but disappeared.

1. Which of the following best describes the primary function of the third sentence (“The Coatzacoalcos…plain”)?

A) To call into question information mentioned in the sentence that immediately precedes it.
B) To introduce the role meteorological conditions played in the change in crop subsistence patterns.
C) To highlight evidence offered up by most scholarship on the disappearance of the Olmec.
D) To provide a specific example supporting a hypothesis that differs from that mentioned in the first sentence.
E) To indicate how major geographical changes affected the Olmec’s ability to govern effectively.



Consider each of the choices separately and select all that apply.


2. Which of the following is an assumption the author of the passage makes?

A) The crops displaced by the flooding of the Coatzacoalcos River would not be viable if replanted in areas unaffected by flooding.
B) Adapting crop subsistence involves some level of central governance.
C) Feuding clans are not capable of sustaining a viable population in the wake of ecological catastrophe.


3. Which of the following, if true, would best undermine the theory the author of the passage provides for the sudden disappearance of the Olmec?

A) Much of the flooding that resulted came not from any diverted tributaries but by rainfall that intensified over the course of a decade.
B) Not all the major subsistence crops were planted along the Coatzacoalcos River.
C) Internal dissent was long offered as a theory for the disappearance of the Mayans, but in recent years there is near unanimous agreement that the disappearance was mostly caused by meteorological phenomenon.
D) The Olmec split into two groups that warred persistently for several decades before both succumbed to meteorological changes that made settlement of the area virtually impossible.
E) The Olmec leadership successfully relocated settlements near one of the new tributaries of Coatzacoalcos, yet years of constant flooding precluded the growth of subsistence crops.



Merged similar topic
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: Most scholarship regarding the sudden disappearance of the O [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
234 posts
GRE Instructor
1065 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne