Last visit was: 23 Apr 2024, 14:32 It is currently 23 Apr 2024, 14:32

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Kudos
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 28620
Own Kudos [?]: 33099 [10]
Given Kudos: 25173
Send PM
avatar
Active Member
Active Member
Joined: 03 Apr 2019
Posts: 195
Own Kudos [?]: 269 [3]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 May 2020
Posts: 91
Own Kudos [?]: 138 [3]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
GRE Prep Club Team Member
Joined: 20 Feb 2017
Posts: 2507
Own Kudos [?]: 3246 [2]
Given Kudos: 1051
GPA: 3.39
Send PM
Re: One of the questions of interest in the study of the evoluti [#permalink]
2
Expert Reply
SANDIPAN1988 wrote:
Hi can you please explain the answer for #20, I am not very clear with the weakens, specially in this context "Wiehle's theory"


20. Which of the following statements, if true, most weakens Wiehle's theory that complex behavior could evolve only once?

(D) Plants in the Cactaceae and Euphorbiaceae families, although they often look alike and have developed similar mechanisms to meet the rigors of the desert, evolved independently. - Correct,

In the case of the Plants in the Cactaceae and Euphorbiaceae families, the complex behavior to meet the rigors of the desert evolved independently. Wiehle's theory postulates that the families must be related, based on the assumption that complex behavior, such as web building, could evolve only once.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 28620
Own Kudos [?]: 33099 [1]
Given Kudos: 25173
Send PM
Re: One of the questions of interest in the study of the evoluti [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
One of the questions of interest in the study of the evolution of spiders is whether the weaving of orb webs evolved only once or several times.

An interesting debate is IF the spider web is the result of just one evolution or several ones.


About half the 35,000 known kinds of spiders make webs; a third of the web weavers make orb webs.


This is just a statistic. I reckon that it could be relevant because it is given so early in the passage.

Since most orb weavers belong either to the Araneidae or the Uloboridae families, the origin of the orb web can be determined only by ascertaining whether the families are related.

This specific kind of spider belong to two families at the same time. IF we do know to which family it belongs we could also to assess if the spider web it produces replies to the question posed in the first sentence. Quite sure.

Recent taxonomic analysis of individuals from both families indicates that the families evolved from different ancestors, thereby contradicting Wiehle's theory.

Recent conceptual investigations (taxonomic) tell us that, turns out, both families (two mainly) are the result of the evolution of SEVERAL individuals (animals/spiders), and this directly contradicts the W Theory. This means this W theory, maybe, sustained that the families originated from ONE or just a few spiders



This theory postulates that the families must be related, based on the assumption that complex behavior, such as web building, could evolve only once.

The theory tells us that complex or not simple behaviors result from just one evolution. Probably the relation is kinda like the following

complex= one straight behavior and ancestor. The families are related each others

According to Kullman, web structure is the only characteristic that suggests a relationship between families.

The spider web is the linkage between the two families

The families differ in appearance, structure of body hair, and arrangement of eyes. Only Uloborids lack venom glands.


The families have characteristics quite similar.


Further identification and study of characteristic features will undoubtedly answer the question of the evolution of the orb web.

We need further investigations to understand better.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 28620
Own Kudos [?]: 33099 [1]
Given Kudos: 25173
Send PM
Re: One of the questions of interest in the study of the evoluti [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
17. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) settle the question of whether orb webs evolved once or more than once
(B) describe scientific speculation concerning an issue related to the evolution of orb webs
(C) analyze the differences between the characteristic features of spiders in the Araneidae and Uloboridae families
(D) question the methods used by earlier investigators of the habits of spiders
(E) demonstrate that Araneidae spiders are not related to Uloboridae spiders

C,D, and E are out of scope because too specific and they did not catch the main idea.

A as well.

the last sentence , also, tells us that we need further investigations

B is the answer
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 28620
Own Kudos [?]: 33099 [1]
Given Kudos: 25173
Send PM
Re: One of the questions of interest in the study of the evoluti [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
18. It can be inferred from the passage that all orb-weaving spiders belong to types of spiders that

(A) lack venom glands
(B) are included either in the Uloboridae or Araneidae families
(C) share few characteristic features with other spider types
(D) comprise less than a third of all known types of spiders
(E) are more recently evolved than other types of spiders

MMhhh at the beginning I thought was B. It is tricky

However, the passage says

Since most orb weavers belong either to the Araneidae or the Uloboridae families,

But the stem says

all orb-weaving spiders

\(most \neq all\)

D is the answer
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 28620
Own Kudos [?]: 33099 [1]
Given Kudos: 25173
Send PM
Re: One of the questions of interest in the study of the evoluti [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
19. According to the passage, members of the Araneidae family can be distinguished from members of the Uloboridae family by all of the following EXCEPT

(A) the presence of venom glands
(B) the type of web they spin
(C) the structure of their body hair
(D) the arrangement of their eyes
(E) their appearance

Easy one. B in 5 seconds

how the web spin is never mentioned in the passage.

We are wondering the evolution of the spider web NOT the type: rectangular, circular, and so on
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 28620
Own Kudos [?]: 33099 [1]
Given Kudos: 25173
Send PM
One of the questions of interest in the study of the evoluti [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
20. Which of the following statements, if true, most weakens Wiehle's theory that complex behavior could evolve only once?


We need to find out a similar answer that mimics the assumption = complex behavior

(A) Horses, introduced to the New World by the Spaniards, thrived under diverse climatic conditions.

climate is not the same as complex

(B) Plants of the Palrnaceae family, descendants of a common ancestor, evolved unique seed forms even though the plants occupy similar habitats throughout the world.

similar habitats is not complex

(C) All mammals are descended from a small, rodent-like animal whose physical characteristics in some form are found in all its descendants.

This is a possible answer. Evolution ONLY once and , turns out, complex according to the W theory

(D) Plants in the Cactaceae and Euphorbiaceae families, although they often look alike and have developed similar mechanisms to meet the rigors of the desert, evolved independently.

evolved independently. This is better than C. We told us to weaken the ONCE evolution/complex. Yes. Evolved independently means different ways. More streams and NOT only once. This the right choice

(E) The Cuban anole, which was recently introduced in the Florida wilds, is quickly replacing the native Florida chameleon because the anole has no competitors.


quickly replacing the native is not complex or evolution


D is the correct answer
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 28620
Own Kudos [?]: 33099 [0]
Given Kudos: 25173
Send PM
Re: One of the questions of interest in the study of the evoluti [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Post A Detailed Correct Solution For The Above Questions And Get A Kudos.
Question From Our New Project: Great Opportunity To Earn Kudos!!!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Feb 2021
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 32
Send PM
Re: One of the questions of interest in the study of the evoluti [#permalink]
Hi can you please explain the answer for #20, I am not very clear with the weakens, specially in this context "Wiehle's theory"
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Feb 2021
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 32
Send PM
Re: One of the questions of interest in the study of the evoluti [#permalink]
GeminiHeat wrote:
SANDIPAN1988 wrote:
Hi can you please explain the answer for #20, I am not very clear with the weakens, specially in this context "Wiehle's theory"


20. Which of the following statements, if true, most weakens Wiehle's theory that complex behavior could evolve only once?

(D) Plants in the Cactaceae and Euphorbiaceae families, although they often look alike and have developed similar mechanisms to meet the rigors of the desert, evolved independently. - Correct,

In the case of the Plants in the Cactaceae and Euphorbiaceae families, the complex behavior to meet the rigors of the desert evolved independently. Wiehle's theory postulates that the families must be related, based on the assumption that complex behavior, such as web building, could evolve only once.


Thank you for your replay, I am really having tough time to break down or simplify the sentence" Wiehle's theory postulates that the families must be related, based on the assumption that complex behavior, such as web building, could evolve only once" Do you think I can simplify, W's theory claim the families/ similar group must be related based on complex behavior and Could evolve only once? I am sorry if it sound really silly.
Prep Club for GRE Bot
[#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Instructor
218 posts
GRE Instructor
1029 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne