The historian’s narrative of the dynasty’s decline is (i)_____, because though there is nothing (ii)_____ the account, largely parts of it rely on (iii)_____.


1) because though there is nothing

If there is nothing, we are not 100% sure of the decline. So it (the decline) is questionable. NOT SURE of it happened

2) because though there is nothing

if we do not know or we do not have variable documents, then we can make just assumptions but nothing sure. We can do only conjectures or hypotheses

3) because though there is nothing

there are NOT fully documented in the account


E under this light is completely out of scope