First of all read, I strongly suggest to you to do ASAP, my post about RC here (it will be the definitive guide soon with several chapters - - already three are done)
https://gre.myprepclub.com/forum/gre-readi ... 20658.htmlsee my thinking spectrum about main idea.
Now,
It might seem illogical that the development of modern currency rests on a scientific discovery, but the invention of the "touchstone" allowed ancient societies to create a standard by which valuable metals could be judged.
In its most basic form, a touchstone is any dark, finely grained stone upon which soft metals leave traces. When rubbed, a process known as "probing," precious metal alloy cleaves to the stone, leaving a stripe. The color of the stripe (which reveals the percentage of its content that is base metal) can then be compared to a stripe of a known grade of standard alloy.
Despite its primitiveness, this probing process allowed merchants to examine alloys quickly and with reasonable certainty.
Though civilizations were using gold and silver currencies as early as 500 b.c., coins were easily forged or diluted with less valuable metals, such as tin or lead. The invention and popularization of the touchstone ensured that pure gold and silver could become a standard expression of value.As you can see you must focus on the very essence of the passage to find the main idea and disregard the details.
The red, blues, and the blues final are the main idea. especially the last one sentence
A. demonstrate that science can influence non-scientific progress
no at all. never read this in the passage
B. underline the touchstone`s importance in the history of currency
of course. last sentence in particular
C. explain how the touchstone is able to measure the purity of an alloy
no. we do know if that is gold or fake not the purity. Even if this was true is just a detail NOT the main idea
D. explore the etymology of the word "touchstone"
whatever.................
E. refute a historical misconception
No misconception. The passage only say that is illogical to thnk about X when already Y was a knew process before . A sort of precursor
Hope now is more clear
regards