Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Your score will improve and your results will be more realistic
Is there something wrong with our timer?Let us know!
The determination of the age of KNM-ER 1470, a humanoid skull, would a
[#permalink]
18 Dec 2022, 11:02
Expert Reply
1
Bookmarks
A
B
C
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
Is your answer correct? Yes No Not Sure
The determination of the age of KNM-ER 1470, a humanoid skull, would add greatly to our knowledge of mammalian evolution. Anthropologists originally dated the habilis skull at 3 million years old. This age seemed unlikely because it was older than the age of any known australophithecines, which are presumed to be the habilis's ancestor. Further attempts to date the skull have led to speculative results.
An elemental property of all living things is that they contain a certain portion of their carbon as the radioactive isotope carbon-14. Carbon-14 is created when solar radiation blasts nuclei in the upper atmosphere, in turn producing neutrons that bombard nitrogen-14 at lower altitudes, turning it into carbon-14. All living things maintain an equilibrium of carbon-14 as they exchange carbon with their surrounding atmosphere. Presuming the rate of production to be constant, the activity of a sample can be compared to the equilibrium activity of living matter, and thus the age can be calculated. However, carbon-14 decays at a half-life of 5,730 years, limiting age determinations to the order of 50,000 years. This time frame can be extended to perhaps 100,000 years using accelerator techniques. Even so, at these ages carbon dating is increasingly unreliable as a result of changes in the carbon-isotope mix. Over the last century, the burning of fossil fuels, which have no carbon-14 content, have had a diluting effect on the atmospheric carbon-14. As a countervailing effect, atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons in the 1950s may well have doubled the atmosphere's carbon-14 content.
Other radiometric dating methods, using relative concentrations of parent-daughter products in radio decay changes of other elements, such as argon, may prove to be of greater benefit for dating such ancient samples as habilis. However, the assumption that the decay rates of these isotopes have always been constant would first have to be substantiated.
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
Question Stats:
50% (03:31) correct
50% (03:44) wrong based on 22 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
Consider each of the following answer choices separately and select all that apply.
The author suggests that the burning of fossil fuels has had which of the following effects on the efficacy of carbon dating techniques?
A. It may increase the carbon-isotope mix of the object being dated. B. It may make items subjected to carbon dating appear to have died later than is the case. C. It may tilt the fragile equilibrium activity of living matter.
Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
53% (00:52) correct
47% (00:54) wrong based on 17 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
The author first mentions the half-life of carbon in order to
A. provide a reason why carbon dating techniques fail to give an age for the habilis skull B. explain the success of carbon dating techniques C. illustrate the difference between carbon dating and other techniques D. show the need for extending carbon dating results with accelerator techniques E. illustrate the carbon equilibrium that all living things maintain
Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
67% (00:50) correct
33% (01:08) wrong based on 15 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
What can be inferred about the proposed solution mentioned in the final paragraph?
A. Continued experimentation with nuclear weapons could restore the expected carbon-14 content to the atmosphere to ensure accuracy of carbon dating. B. Alternatives to fossil fuels should be pursued to prevent further interference with carbon dating procedures. C. Decay rates of isotopes involved in radiometric methods need to be invariable. D. Carbon-14 levels could be artificially restored to previous historical levels to allow an appropriate basis of comparison. E. Appropriate technology to implement radiometric methods needs to be engineered.
Question 4
00:00
Is your answer correct? Yes No Not Sure
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
Select the sentence in the passage in which the author raises a possible objection to proposed alternatives to carbon dating.
Re: The determination of the age of KNM-ER 1470, a humanoid skull, would a
[#permalink]
20 Dec 2022, 05:00
1
Expert Reply
QUESTION 1
According to the passage, the burning of fossil fuels, which have no carbon-14 content, has diluted the atmospheric carbon-14 content. Since carbon dating works by comparing the percentage of carbon remaining in an ancient object to that found in living matter, you would need to have a consistent ratio of carbon-14.Because the burning of fossil fuels has decreased that ratio, however, living matter that died prior to the burning of fossil fuels would have more carbon-14 content when it died, and would therefore appear to have died more recently.Choice (A) is the opposite of what you’re looking for, so you can eliminate it.Choice (C) is not supported by the passage.
Re: The determination of the age of KNM-ER 1470, a humanoid skull, would a
[#permalink]
20 Dec 2022, 05:15
Expert Reply
QUESTION 2
In the first paragraph, the author discusses the trouble that anthropologists have had in dating the habilis skull, which at first they thought to be 3 million years old. In the second paragraph, the author describes how carbon dating techniques work; objects are dated by the ratio of carbon-14 they possess. However, the author goes on to show that the half-life of carbon can date objects only up to 50,000 years old, or 100,000 years at most if accelerator techniques are used.This limitation suggests that carbon dating is unsuitable for providing the exact age of the habilis skull, making choice (A) the best answer.Choice (B) is actually the opposite of what the author suggests for the time frame being discussed.Choice (C) does not answer the question; while the difference is indeed highlighted, this answer ignores the purpose of the contrast. In choice (D), accelerator techniques would still not be adequate to date habilis.Choice (E) is off the mark; the half-life in itself does not illustrate the equilibrium.
Re: The determination of the age of KNM-ER 1470, a humanoid skull, would a
[#permalink]
20 Dec 2022, 05:30
Expert Reply
QUESTION 3
The proposed solution comes at the end of the passage, where the author discusses radiometric dating methods, so the answer needs to address the requirements of this solution.There is an assumption in this method that the isotopes being measured decay at a consistent rate, and this issue is best addressed in choice (C). While choice (E) addresses radiometric methods, the author does not discuss the equipment involved in the process.The remaining answers do not cover this proposed solution.
Re: The determination of the age of KNM-ER 1470, a humanoid skull, would a
[#permalink]
20 Dec 2022, 05:45
Expert Reply
QUESTION 4
However, the assumption that the decay… Be sure to read the question carefully:The author raises a number of possible objections to carbon dating, but only the final paragraph discusses proposed alternatives.The last sentence, the credited response, points out that these alternatives may have the same problem as the carbon dating: inconsistent decay rates.
gmatclubot
Re: The determination of the age of KNM-ER 1470, a humanoid skull, would a [#permalink]