Last visit was: 06 Apr 2025, 06:24 It is currently 06 Apr 2025, 06:24
Decision Tracker
My Rewards
New comers' posts
New posts
Unanswered

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
PREVIOUS TOPIC
NEXT TOPIC

The doctor's presentation went into great detail about the supposed

Tags :
         
Find Similar Topics  About  Add a Tag

Show Tags
Hide Tags

User avatar
D
Carcass
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 31474
Own Kudos [?]: 37667 [1]
Given Kudos: 26234
Send PM
The doctor's presentation went into great detail about the supposed [#permalink] New post   17 Jan 2023, 01:35
Expert Reply
1
Bookmarks
00:00

Question Stats:

63% (00:48) correct 36% (00:46) wrong based on 49 sessions

Hide Show timer Statistics

The doctor's presentation went into great detail about the supposed (i) ________ of the treatment, but failed to discuss any way of obviating damage to auxiliary structures.


Blank (i)
A. diagnosis
B. mien
C. prognosis
D. costs
E. benefits
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
E
User avatar
D
Carcass
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 31474
Own Kudos [?]: 37667 [1]
Given Kudos: 26234
Send PM
Re: The doctor's presentation went into great detail about the supposed [#permalink] New post   19 Jan 2023, 05:00
1
Expert Reply
OE


The pivot here is “but,” and the clue is that the doctor “failed to discuss any way of obviating (anticipating and preventing) damage.” Thus, the doctor went into great detail about only "supposed” good things about the treatment, and only benefits works. Diagnosis (determination of disease) and prognosis (forecast of medical outcome, chances of recovery) both relate to the medical theme, but neither fits in the blank. Mien (appearance, bearing) is unrelated.
User avatar
G
HarishKumar
GRE Instructor
Joined: 24 Dec 2018
Posts: 1071
Own Kudos [?]: 1438 [0]
Given Kudos: 24
Send PM
The doctor's presentation went into great detail about the supposed [#permalink] New post   21 Jan 2023, 00:25
The thought contrastor "but" divides the sentence into two fragments contributing contradictory positions. The second part states that the doctor failed to discuss how to prevent damage to auxiliary structures. Therefore he must have discussed successfully in detail about the opposite of preventative medication - namely, the benefits of treatment.
Prep Club for GRE Bot
gmatclubot
The doctor's presentation went into great detail about the supposed [#permalink]
21 Jan 2023, 00:25
Moderators:
bronaugust
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
VibhuAnurag
GRE Instructor
234 posts
HarishKumar
GRE Instructor
1071 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Main navigation

Partners

GRE Resources

www.ets.org/gre | About | Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy | Prep Club for GRE Rules | Contact