Re: Her attempts to wrest fiction free from traditional constraints like p
[#permalink]
15 Jan 2024, 10:51
A. **A studied influence:** This implies a careful, deliberate influence. While this could describe an impact that is well thought out, it might not capture the force or decisiveness suggested by the context.
B. **A negligible influence:** This option suggests a minimal or insignificant impact, which contradicts the notion that her attempts had a meaningful effect on critical theory, novel, cinema, and psychology.
C. **A decisive influence:** This choice conveys a strong, conclusive impact. It aligns well with the idea that her efforts were influential and had a significant effect on various domains.
D. **An unmistakable influence:** This phrase implies that her influence is clear and easily recognizable. It reinforces the idea that her impact was not subtle or easily overlooked, fitting the context.
E. **An insignificant influence:** Similar to option B, this suggests a minimal impact, which doesn't align with the context of her attempts being noteworthy and influential.
F. **A restorative influence:** This implies a renewing or revitalizing influence, which doesn't seem to match the context of breaking free from traditional constraints. It's more suggestive of preserving or restoring existing norms.
In summary, options C and D, "a decisive influence" and "an unmistakable influence," best capture the idea that her attempts had a clear and impactful effect on critical theory, novel, cinema, and psychology.
Posted from my mobile device