GRE Prep Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Some have argued that naming scientific discoveries after the people
[#permalink]
14 Jan 2024, 23:50
14 Jan 2024, 23:50
Expert Reply
2
Bookmarks
00:00
Question Stats:
68% (00:36) correct
31% (00:50) wrong based on 32 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Some have argued that naming scientific discoveries after the people who make them can _____ scientific progress, because the nomenclature lacks useful clarity, having no relationship to the underlying principles that govern nature.
| Two Answers |
|---|
| A. hamper |
| B. abet |
| C. instigate | D. obscure | E. nullify |
| F. impede |
Part of the project: The Butler-GRE Daily New Quant and Verbal Questions to Practice (2023) - Gain 20 Kudos & Get FREE Access to GRE Prep Club TESTS
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Free Materials for the GRE General Exam - Where to get it!!
The Hardest GRE questions quant and verbal on GrePrepclub as July 2023
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Free Materials for the GRE General Exam - Where to get it!!
The Hardest GRE questions quant and verbal on GrePrepclub as July 2023
Re: Some have argued that naming scientific discoveries after the people
[#permalink]
30 Jan 2024, 21:26
30 Jan 2024, 21:26
2
The answers are A and F.
The choices that best fit the context are "hamper" (A) and "impede" (F). These words capture the notion that naming conventions can obstruct or hinder scientific progress by lacking clarity and not being related to the underlying principles.
A. Hamper: Hamper means to hinder or obstruct the progress or development of something. In the context of naming scientific discoveries, if the nomenclature lacks clarity and doesn't relate to the underlying principles, it can impede or slow down scientific progress.
B. Abet: Abet means to assist or support. If scientific discoveries are named in a way that assists or supports scientific progress, it would be counterintuitive to the argument presented in the sentence. Therefore, "abet" is not the appropriate choice here.
C. Instigate: Instigate means to initiate or provoke. Naming scientific discoveries after individuals might not necessarily initiate or provoke scientific progress. The sentence suggests a negative impact on clarity, so "instigate" is not the suitable choice.
D. Obscure: Obscure means to conceal or make unclear. Given the context, "obscure" is not relevant.
E. Nullify: Nullify means to make something null or void, rendering it ineffective. While naming conventions might impact clarity, "nullify" suggests a complete negation, which might be too strong for the context. The argument is more about hindering or impeding progress rather than rendering it completely ineffective.
F. Impede: Impede means to obstruct or hinder progress. This word aligns closely with the idea that naming scientific discoveries in a way that lacks clarity can hinder or impede scientific progress.
The choices that best fit the context are "hamper" (A) and "impede" (F). These words capture the notion that naming conventions can obstruct or hinder scientific progress by lacking clarity and not being related to the underlying principles.
A. Hamper: Hamper means to hinder or obstruct the progress or development of something. In the context of naming scientific discoveries, if the nomenclature lacks clarity and doesn't relate to the underlying principles, it can impede or slow down scientific progress.
B. Abet: Abet means to assist or support. If scientific discoveries are named in a way that assists or supports scientific progress, it would be counterintuitive to the argument presented in the sentence. Therefore, "abet" is not the appropriate choice here.
C. Instigate: Instigate means to initiate or provoke. Naming scientific discoveries after individuals might not necessarily initiate or provoke scientific progress. The sentence suggests a negative impact on clarity, so "instigate" is not the suitable choice.
D. Obscure: Obscure means to conceal or make unclear. Given the context, "obscure" is not relevant.
E. Nullify: Nullify means to make something null or void, rendering it ineffective. While naming conventions might impact clarity, "nullify" suggests a complete negation, which might be too strong for the context. The argument is more about hindering or impeding progress rather than rendering it completely ineffective.
F. Impede: Impede means to obstruct or hinder progress. This word aligns closely with the idea that naming scientific discoveries in a way that lacks clarity can hinder or impede scientific progress.
Re: Some have argued that naming scientific discoveries after the people
[#permalink]
07 Feb 2024, 07:23
07 Feb 2024, 07:23
1
Bookmarks
The word "because" suggests a cause-effect relationship between the two parts of the sentence separated by it. If the nomenclature "lacks useful clarity, having no relationship to the underlying principles that govern nature" it can only obstruct scientific progress as these are negative indicators. Only hamper and impede fit the bill. The word nullify is extreme and the negative effects mentioned will not materialize if the scientific progress is only hidden, hence we reject obscure. The words abet and instigate convey the opposite sense of what is required, so we reject them as well.
The Choices are A and F
The Choices are A and F
