Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Your score will improve and your results will be more realistic
Is there something wrong with our timer?Let us know!
A pioneering figure in modern sociology, French social theorist Emile
[#permalink]
21 Feb 2024, 01:53
Expert Reply
3
Bookmarks
A
B
C
D
E
A
B
C
D
E
Is your answer correct? Yes No Not Sure
A pioneering figure in modern sociology, French social theorist Emile Durkheim examined the effect of societal cohesion on emotional well-being. Believing that scientific methods should be applied to the study of society, Durkheim studied the levels of integration in various social formations and the impact that such cohesion had on individuals within the group. He postulated that social groups with high levels of integration serve to buffer their members from frustrations and tragedies that could otherwise lead to desperation and self-destruction. Integration, in Durkheim's view, generally arises through shared activities and values. Durkheim distinguished between mechanical solidarity and organic solidarity in classifying integrated groups. Mechanical solidarity dominates in groups in which individual differences are minimized and group devotion to a common goal is high. Durkheim identified mechanical solidarity among groups with little division of labor and high degrees of cultural similarity, such as among more traditional and geographically isolated groups. Organic solidarity, in contrast, prevails in groups with high levels of individual differences, such as those with a highly specialized division of labor. In such groups, individual differences are a powerful source of connection rather than of division. Because people engage in highly differentiated ways of life. they are by necessity interdependent. In these societies, there is greater freedom from some external controls, but such freedom occurs in concert with the interdependence of individuals, not in conflict with it. Durkheim realized that societies may take many forms and, consequently, that group allegiance can manifest itself in a variety of ways. In both types of societies outlined previously, however, Durkheim stressed that adherence to a common set of assumptions about the world was a necessary prerequisite for maintaining group integrity and avoiding social decay.
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
52% (03:20) correct
48% (03:51) wrong based on 29 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
1. Which of the following is NOT a feature of an organic societal formation, according to Emile Durkheim?
A Members are buffered from individual frustration that would lead the individual to cease being a productive member of society. B Citizens operate independently in their daily lives, but toward a common overall goal. C Each person must come to accept a series of assumptions that form a collective worldview shared by the formation. D Workers have an even division of labor and share the work of common tasks. E Individual differences are celebrated, and have a strengthening effect on the society.
Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
D
E
Question Stats:
36% (01:12) correct
64% (00:53) wrong based on 28 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
2. Which of the following might be examples of a mechanical solidarity societal formation as explained by the passage?
a A religious order living in a monastery with an evenly distributed division of labor b A company comprised of a group of architects, carpenters, plumbers, and construction workers who can design and complete all facets of a building project from start to finish c A xenophobic tribe living in an isolated fishing village amid an uncolonized set of islands
Question 3
00:00
Is your answer correct? Yes No Not Sure
Question Stats:
0% (00:00) correct
0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
3. Select the sentence in the passage that explains why a society displaying organic solidarity tends more toward social codependence than does a mechanical societal formation.
Re: A pioneering figure in modern sociology, French social theorist Emile
[#permalink]
23 Apr 2024, 02:01
Expert Reply
EXPLANATION QUESTION #1
Societies that distribute labor evenly and parcel out common tasks among everyone are not using a specialized labor force. They fit the mechanical solidarity model, not the organic solidarity one. Choice (A) and choice (C) are found among the descriptions for both forms of Durkheim's societal formations, the first early in the paragraph and the other toward the end, so they are wrong. Within the section discussing organic solidarity societies, you can find, as part of the definition, differently worded forms of both choice (B) and choice (E).
Re: A pioneering figure in modern sociology, French social theorist Emile
[#permalink]
23 Apr 2024, 02:06
Expert Reply
EXPLANATION QUESTION #2
Knowing that xenophobic means "fearful of 1 outsiders" helps, but is not necessary for answering that portion of the question. Keep choice (C) as an answer, but check the others as well. Choice (A) also meets the criteria. A monastic religious order (such as monks) in which the members do all the same tasks without specialization meets the non-specialized distribution of labor portion of the author's definition as well. Only choice (B) fails to meet the definition; even though the workers listed may share a singular goal (of creating a house or building), each worker has very specific specialties and abilities—a feature associated with organic solidarity groups.
Re: A pioneering figure in modern sociology, French social theorist Emile
[#permalink]
23 Apr 2024, 02:07
Expert Reply
EXPLANATION QUESTION #3
The sentence is the right answer; it explains that because the members of an organic society do not have the same skill sets, they are forced to rely on others for those things they are unable to do or do not have the skill for.
gmatclubot
Re: A pioneering figure in modern sociology, French social theorist Emile [#permalink]