Carcass wrote:
OE
Answer Blank (i): Choice A, "logical," means "capable of reasoning in a clear and consistent manner" and may seem correct. But choice B, "understandable," is a better choice between the two because it means "capable of being understood." In the context of the sentence, the writer is not reasoning something out, but stating his/her opinion. Choice C, "inexplicable," means "impossible to explain, incomprehensible." It is the opposite of "understandable." In the context of the entire sentence, the word does not fit the meaning, and so, is incorrect.
Answer Blank (ii): In choosing answers for text completion items, consider the style and tone of the text. Choices D and E, "flashy" and "showy," don't fit either. Only choice F, "overdrawn," meaning "exaggerated" fits the meaning.
Greetings Carcass,
The fact that the second sentence is beginning with "because" made me confused. It sounds like the author is complaining about "exaggeration" to the degree that he calls it "carricature". By the way, why would somebody use because after something that is understandable??? When some thing is understandable I wouldn't prefer to use "because", which is because it does not seem to require explanation... I thought inexplicable for the first and the overdrawn for the second fill were more sensible...