GRE Prep Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achie
[#permalink]
20 Jul 2025, 04:04
20 Jul 2025, 04:04
1
Carcass
please evaluate my essay and also rate the essay on the scale of 1 to 6 at the end of your evaluation
prompt: The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
There are currently seven continents and about one hundred and forty four countries, having a distinct culture. Each nation has gone through certain progress of time, facing difficulties and triumphs. A prosperous nation indicates a rich culture and heritage. it is true at least for the most countries. The argument takes a positive stance on the indication of a great nation in terms of general welfare available to its citizens. In my opinion, I mostly disagree that an eminent nation displays its greatness solely based on how the citizens are taken care of for the following reasons. Though i do concede that it isn't possible for a nation to flourish without any general welfare.
First of all, the eminence of a nation is indicated by how well it citizens are educated, particularly in arts and science. For example, the Germany which made education free, funded by the tax money of it’s citizens have enabled every citizen to complete their education in the field of science, art and other fields. Germans Engineers are known as the pioneers of Mechanical engineering which is heavily dependent on science. The cars they manufacture are known throughout the world. Volkswagen is one of many examples translating to the “people’s car”. By providing the opportunity and encouraging the development to be made in the field of science, the invention and the development of automobiles has led to the nation achieve such great progress marking it as the land of automobiles.
Second of all, the citizens of a great nation should be free to elect their rulers, allowing them to choose who will guide them. It should be democratic in nature. A perfect example of a democratic nation is the India, which is known for its largest democracy. Every five years, the elections are held to elect the prime minister representing the nation and also the regional elections to elect their prime minister representing a state. The people are allowed to choose any candidate that they like as the prime minister, their ruler who can guide them towards prosperity. This isn’t the case with the countries such as the North Korea where the dictatorship is in place, clearly showcasing its depravity by stripping its citizens of freedom from choosing a leader. It is visible in their citizens, where only the upper class is allowed to opt for better facilities, while the middle and the lower class suffer and have no option to either endure, or escape it or no longer handle the tyrannical nature of their ruler and expire from it.
However, it is not necessary that a nation is prosperous due to the fact that it has made a good progress in science, arts and in politics. Every nation has this one problem that is impossible to overcome just because of its overall progress, poverty. No matter how good a nation is, a certain group of people will always face some unfortunate consequences. Not every one of us could access the facilities such as medical, technological etc, due to reasons such as discrimination on the grounds of race and religion. For example, in The India, we could witness the problems of homelessness, racial discrimination etc. This is particularly visible in the people belonging to lower cast, never to have a good life. This is where the welfare services and also strict laws preventing the above-mentioned problems come into action. The Indian government has made it easy for the people of lower cast to have reservations in government jobs and in college admission providing an opportunity, facilitating the growth of the unfortunate. However, this has led to a serious problem where the deserved ones, who are more qualified to have job opportunities are often overlooked in favour of the reserved ones. Here in my opinion the welfare services of India should facilitate the unfortunate ones to have access good education and medical facilities for free which gives them the opportunity to improve themselves, learn skills to actually be deserving of the job opportunity and for the education.
In conclusion, I believe that a prominent nation should display a great progress in science, arts and politics, indicating that it has flourished with good facilities and opportunities with no discrimination in place but also it should support the people who can’t able to access the fruits of the progress it has made by allowing them to be deserving.
please evaluate my essay and also rate the essay on the scale of 1 to 6 at the end of your evaluation
prompt: The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
There are currently seven continents and about one hundred and forty four countries, having a distinct culture. Each nation has gone through certain progress of time, facing difficulties and triumphs. A prosperous nation indicates a rich culture and heritage. it is true at least for the most countries. The argument takes a positive stance on the indication of a great nation in terms of general welfare available to its citizens. In my opinion, I mostly disagree that an eminent nation displays its greatness solely based on how the citizens are taken care of for the following reasons. Though i do concede that it isn't possible for a nation to flourish without any general welfare.
First of all, the eminence of a nation is indicated by how well it citizens are educated, particularly in arts and science. For example, the Germany which made education free, funded by the tax money of it’s citizens have enabled every citizen to complete their education in the field of science, art and other fields. Germans Engineers are known as the pioneers of Mechanical engineering which is heavily dependent on science. The cars they manufacture are known throughout the world. Volkswagen is one of many examples translating to the “people’s car”. By providing the opportunity and encouraging the development to be made in the field of science, the invention and the development of automobiles has led to the nation achieve such great progress marking it as the land of automobiles.
Second of all, the citizens of a great nation should be free to elect their rulers, allowing them to choose who will guide them. It should be democratic in nature. A perfect example of a democratic nation is the India, which is known for its largest democracy. Every five years, the elections are held to elect the prime minister representing the nation and also the regional elections to elect their prime minister representing a state. The people are allowed to choose any candidate that they like as the prime minister, their ruler who can guide them towards prosperity. This isn’t the case with the countries such as the North Korea where the dictatorship is in place, clearly showcasing its depravity by stripping its citizens of freedom from choosing a leader. It is visible in their citizens, where only the upper class is allowed to opt for better facilities, while the middle and the lower class suffer and have no option to either endure, or escape it or no longer handle the tyrannical nature of their ruler and expire from it.
However, it is not necessary that a nation is prosperous due to the fact that it has made a good progress in science, arts and in politics. Every nation has this one problem that is impossible to overcome just because of its overall progress, poverty. No matter how good a nation is, a certain group of people will always face some unfortunate consequences. Not every one of us could access the facilities such as medical, technological etc, due to reasons such as discrimination on the grounds of race and religion. For example, in The India, we could witness the problems of homelessness, racial discrimination etc. This is particularly visible in the people belonging to lower cast, never to have a good life. This is where the welfare services and also strict laws preventing the above-mentioned problems come into action. The Indian government has made it easy for the people of lower cast to have reservations in government jobs and in college admission providing an opportunity, facilitating the growth of the unfortunate. However, this has led to a serious problem where the deserved ones, who are more qualified to have job opportunities are often overlooked in favour of the reserved ones. Here in my opinion the welfare services of India should facilitate the unfortunate ones to have access good education and medical facilities for free which gives them the opportunity to improve themselves, learn skills to actually be deserving of the job opportunity and for the education.
In conclusion, I believe that a prominent nation should display a great progress in science, arts and politics, indicating that it has flourished with good facilities and opportunities with no discrimination in place but also it should support the people who can’t able to access the fruits of the progress it has made by allowing them to be deserving.
The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achie
[#permalink]
20 Jul 2025, 08:35
20 Jul 2025, 08:35
Expert Reply
Ok sir
The essay had a quantum leap, compared to the last one. It is good. I would say 4.5
What are the weak point ? well
Starting from the bottom, the conclusion. It should be more stretched
However my main concern are the contents which are not perfectly focused
The stem says
The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
Now what that implies: the wealth of a nation is NOT - analyze
by the achievements of its rulers,
for example who is the prime minister or the president or , essentially, the gov create a powerful army or an empire such as the commonwealth
artists, or scientists,
Italy for example has probably the richest heritage and cultural site on earth: sistine chapel, it had Leonado Da Vinci, the renaissance and so forth
but by the general welfare of its people.
This means that a nation is rich and powerful NOT from its extension or the points above but IF every single citizen has a good health care, a good basic salary, affordable housing, schools, university with low tuition and so forth
I would agree with that. The essay is NOT only a matter of grammar but also the way you write a cogent reasoning
Instead you in the second paragraph wrote
Second of all, the citizens of a great nation should be free to elect their rulers, allowing them to choose who will guide them
This is not pertinent to the essay. And they know that, who review and analyze it
Instead an example is the following
I hope this helps sir
The essay had a quantum leap, compared to the last one. It is good. I would say 4.5
What are the weak point ? well
Starting from the bottom, the conclusion. It should be more stretched
However my main concern are the contents which are not perfectly focused
The stem says
The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
Now what that implies: the wealth of a nation is NOT - analyze
by the achievements of its rulers,
for example who is the prime minister or the president or , essentially, the gov create a powerful army or an empire such as the commonwealth
artists, or scientists,
Italy for example has probably the richest heritage and cultural site on earth: sistine chapel, it had Leonado Da Vinci, the renaissance and so forth
but by the general welfare of its people.
This means that a nation is rich and powerful NOT from its extension or the points above but IF every single citizen has a good health care, a good basic salary, affordable housing, schools, university with low tuition and so forth
I would agree with that. The essay is NOT only a matter of grammar but also the way you write a cogent reasoning
Instead you in the second paragraph wrote
Second of all, the citizens of a great nation should be free to elect their rulers, allowing them to choose who will guide them
This is not pertinent to the essay. And they know that, who review and analyze it
Instead an example is the following
Quote:
**Introduction: Redefining National Greatness**
The conversation about what makes a nation truly great often focuses on things like military strength, tech breakthroughs, or cultural impact. But there’s a more important measurement: how well a country takes care of its citizens. This essay makes the case that, while standout achievements in various areas can earn respect, real national greatness comes down to how well a society meets the basic needs and rights of everyone. By looking at historical examples, current data, and different philosophical views, we can show why general welfare is the best way to assess a nation’s true standing.
**The Limitations of Elite-Centric Metrics**
History is full of countries that had amazing leaders, artists, and scientists but still let their general populations down. The Soviet Union achieved incredible things in space tech but had serious shortages of everyday goods. France during the Belle Époque was marked by amazing art but also faced serious urban poverty. These cases show the flaw in linking special achievements to national greatness—they often reflect the benefits enjoyed by a small elite rather than the overall health of society. Economic evidence supports this idea, indicating that countries focused on elite successes rather than general welfare often deal with greater income inequality, less social mobility, and shorter periods of tech leadership, despite all their celebrated wins.
**General Welfare as the Foundation of Lasting Greatness**
On the flip side, countries that put a priority on general welfare tend to create the right environment for sustainable success. The Nordic model clearly shows that investing in universal healthcare, education, and social security leads to happier citizens, better economic mobility, and more innovation. This isn’t just true for wealthy nations. For instance, Costa Rica got rid of its military in 1948 to fund education and healthcare, resulting in a life expectancy that exceeds that of the United States, nearly universal literacy, and a top spot in environmental conservation. These stories prove that investing in general welfare brings benefits that spread across all parts of society, including those usually linked to national pride.
**The Ripple Effects of Prioritizing Welfare**
Focusing on general welfare sets off a chain reaction, improving multiple aspects of national life. Healthy, educated workforces are better at adapting to tech changes, and less wealth disparity means fewer social issues. When people’s basic needs are met, more can contribute creatively, as seen during the Dutch Golden Age after significant social reforms. Scientific progress also benefits from widespread access to education, which expands the talent pool, like what happened in postwar Japan before its tech boom. Moreover, nations that are seen as caring examples gain soft power, with Germany’s recovery after WWII largely credited to its social market policies rather than just military or scientific feats.
**Counterarguments and Rebuttals**
Some may argue that elite achievements boost national pride and spark progress. While there’s some truth to that, it overlooks important realities. Most groundbreaking innovations are built on broad educational foundations rather than coming from a few geniuses. A stable society encourages long-term investment in research, and cultural achievements feel more genuine when they come from healthy communities. The U.S.'s mid-20th century dominance didn’t just happen because of individual accomplishments; policies like the GI Bill created widespread opportunities, showing how general welfare actually supports exceptional success instead of holding it back.
**Conclusion: Welfare as the Ultimate Benchmark**
Real national greatness isn’t about the number of Nobel Prizes a country earns or how much land it controls; it’s about how a society treats its most vulnerable members. The nations we look back on fondly—from ancient Athens to today’s Scandinavia—are those that balanced cultural and scientific successes with a strong commitment to citizen welfare. As we face global challenges like climate change and tech disruptions, this point becomes even more urgent. The best way to achieve lasting greatness isn’t just by celebrating individual accomplishments but by building societies where everyone can thrive—because in those kinds of environments, human potential really shines. This deep dive moves beyond shallow measures of national success to really highlight the importance of general welfare, providing solid support for its key message.
The conversation about what makes a nation truly great often focuses on things like military strength, tech breakthroughs, or cultural impact. But there’s a more important measurement: how well a country takes care of its citizens. This essay makes the case that, while standout achievements in various areas can earn respect, real national greatness comes down to how well a society meets the basic needs and rights of everyone. By looking at historical examples, current data, and different philosophical views, we can show why general welfare is the best way to assess a nation’s true standing.
**The Limitations of Elite-Centric Metrics**
History is full of countries that had amazing leaders, artists, and scientists but still let their general populations down. The Soviet Union achieved incredible things in space tech but had serious shortages of everyday goods. France during the Belle Époque was marked by amazing art but also faced serious urban poverty. These cases show the flaw in linking special achievements to national greatness—they often reflect the benefits enjoyed by a small elite rather than the overall health of society. Economic evidence supports this idea, indicating that countries focused on elite successes rather than general welfare often deal with greater income inequality, less social mobility, and shorter periods of tech leadership, despite all their celebrated wins.
**General Welfare as the Foundation of Lasting Greatness**
On the flip side, countries that put a priority on general welfare tend to create the right environment for sustainable success. The Nordic model clearly shows that investing in universal healthcare, education, and social security leads to happier citizens, better economic mobility, and more innovation. This isn’t just true for wealthy nations. For instance, Costa Rica got rid of its military in 1948 to fund education and healthcare, resulting in a life expectancy that exceeds that of the United States, nearly universal literacy, and a top spot in environmental conservation. These stories prove that investing in general welfare brings benefits that spread across all parts of society, including those usually linked to national pride.
**The Ripple Effects of Prioritizing Welfare**
Focusing on general welfare sets off a chain reaction, improving multiple aspects of national life. Healthy, educated workforces are better at adapting to tech changes, and less wealth disparity means fewer social issues. When people’s basic needs are met, more can contribute creatively, as seen during the Dutch Golden Age after significant social reforms. Scientific progress also benefits from widespread access to education, which expands the talent pool, like what happened in postwar Japan before its tech boom. Moreover, nations that are seen as caring examples gain soft power, with Germany’s recovery after WWII largely credited to its social market policies rather than just military or scientific feats.
**Counterarguments and Rebuttals**
Some may argue that elite achievements boost national pride and spark progress. While there’s some truth to that, it overlooks important realities. Most groundbreaking innovations are built on broad educational foundations rather than coming from a few geniuses. A stable society encourages long-term investment in research, and cultural achievements feel more genuine when they come from healthy communities. The U.S.'s mid-20th century dominance didn’t just happen because of individual accomplishments; policies like the GI Bill created widespread opportunities, showing how general welfare actually supports exceptional success instead of holding it back.
**Conclusion: Welfare as the Ultimate Benchmark**
Real national greatness isn’t about the number of Nobel Prizes a country earns or how much land it controls; it’s about how a society treats its most vulnerable members. The nations we look back on fondly—from ancient Athens to today’s Scandinavia—are those that balanced cultural and scientific successes with a strong commitment to citizen welfare. As we face global challenges like climate change and tech disruptions, this point becomes even more urgent. The best way to achieve lasting greatness isn’t just by celebrating individual accomplishments but by building societies where everyone can thrive—because in those kinds of environments, human potential really shines. This deep dive moves beyond shallow measures of national success to really highlight the importance of general welfare, providing solid support for its key message.
I hope this helps sir
The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achie
[#permalink]
20 Jul 2025, 09:21
20 Jul 2025, 09:21
the last time i followed the templet it was indeed helpful but not enough
today i came across a gregmat video which showed the same templet but he explained many things in it, later i realized that the templet is similar to the templet you made in how to write the essay and yeah i guess that helped me this time
as you mentioned the 3rd paragraph needs to be related to the 2nd one. i did feel that it was somewhat off from the previous para.
4.5 is a great progress, aiming for a 5 in the next essay.
thank you for your evaluation
today i came across a gregmat video which showed the same templet but he explained many things in it, later i realized that the templet is similar to the templet you made in how to write the essay and yeah i guess that helped me this time
as you mentioned the 3rd paragraph needs to be related to the 2nd one. i did feel that it was somewhat off from the previous para.
4.5 is a great progress, aiming for a 5 in the next essay.
thank you for your evaluation
