Last visit was: 21 Jul 2025, 21:36 It is currently 21 Jul 2025, 21:36

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 32753
Own Kudos [?]: 39052 [0]
Given Kudos: 26412
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 32753
Own Kudos [?]: 39052 [0]
Given Kudos: 26412
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 32753
Own Kudos [?]: 39052 [1]
Given Kudos: 26412
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 32753
Own Kudos [?]: 39052 [0]
Given Kudos: 26412
Send PM
Re: Characterized as half zebra and half horse, the quagga sounds like a m [#permalink]
Expert Reply
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION QUESTION 3


B

This question asks you to evaluate the statement and identify what conclusions you can draw using the information from the passage. Choice (A) overstates the passage. Humans were historically responsible for the quagga's extinction. There's no way to deduce what would have happened absent human contact. Choice (B) follows from the portion of the passage in which you learn that DNA analysis helped determine that the quagga is a subspecies of the zebra and not a unique species. That's enough to make the broadly worded choice (B) a viable conclusion. Choice (C) does not provide a viable answer; it assumes too much information. The passage states that researchers are trying to bring back the extinct quagga, but it doesn't say how likely these efforts are to be successful, nor does it opine on how much concern extinctions should provoke.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Jul 2025
Posts: 14
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Characterized as half zebra and half horse, the quagga sounds like a m [#permalink]
Yes, B is the correct answer overall. But, I still think a case can be made for A. After all, even though your explanation for not choosing A is that there is no way of knowing for certain whether the quagga would have survived, you also say that humans were responsible for the animals' extinction. I am not necessarily an animal rights spokesperson; however, there is an understandable assumption that the species' survival would have been more likely had they not been hunted by people. The paragraph should have added a sentence which, however indirect (so as not to clearly state something that would provide a clue to the examinee), would shed a bit more light on this issue.

One of the issues I take with some of these standardized tests in Reading Comprehension is that, while it's proper for students of reading to not make assumptions about subject matter conclusions, often the writer expresses ideas that are often ambiguous. Not all teachers teach their students to think deeply critically about things. Often, it's just an issue of time. And frankly, writers, themselves, often write in ways that are deliberately meant to allow for a certain liberal or "open ended" interpretation by the reader. Not all academic writers or non-fiction writers compose thoughts as if they were writing a thesis or dissertation.
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: Characterized as half zebra and half horse, the quagga sounds like a m [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
234 posts
GRE Instructor
1091 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne