Re: Mark Twain is "first and last and all the time, so far as he is anythi
[#permalink]
03 Aug 2025, 09:16
Question 1:
The author mentions Huckleberry Finn in order to illustrate
Let's recall the relevant sentence:
*"Even Peck himself lauds Huckleberry Finn, whose strengths include an unfailing eye for hypocrisy and a deadly serious moral judgment, as a definitively American character who leaps real from the printed page. Twain certainly uses humor throughout all his works, but not as an end in itself."*
What does this show?
- Peck views Huckleberry Finn as more than humor - it has serious moral qualities and realistic characters.
- Twain's characters are multidimensional, not just humorous caricatures.
Now evaluate the options:
- (A) Twain's reputation for writing humorous novels.
Partially true but not the main point about Huckleberry Finn here.
- (B) Twain's skill in creating hypocritical characters.
No - mentions "an eye for hypocrisy," but not creating hypocritical characters per se.
- (C) Peck's error in considering Twain to be a humorist at all.
Too strong - the passage notes Peck is too limiting but doesn't say Peck denies Twain is a humorist.
- (D) Twain's ability to craft characters of multiple dimensions.
Fits well: Huckleberry Finn is a serious, complex character, not just humorous.
- (E) Peck's insight into Twain's moral judgment.
Peck praises the moral judgment in Huckleberry Finn, but the passage emphasizes Twain's complexity more broadly.
Best answer:
(D) Twain's ability to craft characters of multiple dimensions.
Question 2:
The author of the passage is chiefly concerned with
Recall the main idea:
- Peck pigeonholed Twain strictly as a humorist, focusing on his funny works.
- The author argues that Peck's view is too narrow and that Twain's works have serious, lasting depth.
- The passage nuances Twain's humor and moral seriousness.
Evaluate options:
- (A) demonstrating that Twain was not a humorist.
No - the passage acknowledges Twain is a humorist too, but not only that.
- (B) arguing that Peck's judgment of Twain is too limited.
Perfectly summarizes the passage.
- (C) documenting Peck's contribution to literary criticism.
Not the main concern-the passage uses Peck as a foil rather than focusing on his contributions.
- (D) concluding that Twain was better as a serious writer than as a humorist.
The passage doesn't clearly rank such a hierarchy.
- (E) pointing out the importance of serious themes in good writing.
A bit too general; the focus is on Twain and Peck's views rather than general writing.
Best answer:
(B) arguing that Peck's judgment of Twain is too limited.
Summary of answers:
- Question 1: (D)
- Question 2: (B)