Re: The judge's closing remarks were nothing if not
[#permalink]
04 Oct 2025, 11:36
Let's break this down.
The sentence says:
- "nothing if not ___________ " means "certainly __________ " or "extremely ___________ ."
- He "belabored his every point" (over-explained, went on too long)
- and "underscored each utterance with the pounding of the gavel" (emphasized heavily).
So the missing word should mean extremely detailed, lengthy, or leaving nothing out - not about honesty or boldness.
Possible meanings:
- A. brash - offensively bold - not supported.
- B. forthright - direct and honest - not supported.
- C. thorough - complete, detailed - fits "belabored every point."
- D. candid - frank and honest - not supported.
- E. audacious - daring - not supported.
- F. exhaustive - comprehensive and thorough - fits "belabored every point" perfectly.
So C. thorough and F. exhaustive both fit.
Answer: C, F