GRE Prep Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Many Enlightenment philosophers viewed Machiavelli’s book as
[#permalink]
03 Oct 2017, 04:00
03 Oct 2017, 04:00
Expert Reply
00:00
Question Stats:
65% (00:49) correct
34% (00:42) wrong based on 44 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Many Enlightenment philosophers viewed Machiavelli’s book as a satire meant to expose and caricature the _________ claims to power of the very figures Machiavelli pretended to endorse.
A. sarcastic
B. specious
C. spurious
D. squalid
E. stolid
F. stoic
Show: :: OA
Specious, spurious
Practice Questions
Question: 56
Page: 108
Question: 56
Page: 108
Re: Many Enlightenment philosophers viewed Machiavelli’s book as
[#permalink]
08 Oct 2017, 13:16
08 Oct 2017, 13:16
Expert Reply
Explanation
If Machiavelli only “pretended” to endorse the claims to power, and if they were subject to exposure and caricature, they must have been not only illegitimate but ridiculous.
None of the answers suggests ridiculousness, but two answers — specious and spurious — mean the claims are false. While not synonyms, both
words describe claims that are superficially attractive, but in fact false.
Hence options specious, spurious are correct!
If Machiavelli only “pretended” to endorse the claims to power, and if they were subject to exposure and caricature, they must have been not only illegitimate but ridiculous.
None of the answers suggests ridiculousness, but two answers — specious and spurious — mean the claims are false. While not synonyms, both
words describe claims that are superficially attractive, but in fact false.
Hence options specious, spurious are correct!
gmatclubot
Re: Many Enlightenment philosophers viewed Machiavelli’s book as [#permalink]
08 Oct 2017, 13:16
Moderators:
