Last visit was: 29 Nov 2025, 05:18 It is currently 29 Nov 2025, 05:18

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Retired Moderator
Joined: 07 Jan 2018
Posts: 739
Own Kudos [?]: 1510 [4]
Given Kudos: 93
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 34075
Own Kudos [?]: 40513 [0]
Given Kudos: 26629
Send PM
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 27 Feb 2017
Posts: 188
Own Kudos [?]: 154 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 34075
Own Kudos [?]: 40513 [0]
Given Kudos: 26629
Send PM
Re: climate by becoming a possible source of global atmospheric [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Hi,

sorry, regarding the Q2 fairly likely is not directly stated in the passage. It is something (the probability the Arctic will be an important source of cd)that YOU have to infer based on the information provided.

As for Q4, when you have to select a sentence in the passage NOT always the time is a single sentence, rather a full concept that shows clearly the meaning asked by the question itself.

How this helps.

Regards
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Sep 2019
Posts: 28
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: climate by becoming a possible source of global atmospheric [#permalink]
Q2 is the most ambiguous question I have ever come across!! What is unlikely? 0%? Fairly likely is supposed to be 25%? Very likely is supposed to be 50%? Nearly certain 75%? Certain 100%? Even if I assume it this way, how do you conclude 20%!? worst question ever.
Please remove the question or the passage altogether from RC butler.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Sep 2019
Posts: 49
Own Kudos [?]: 22 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: climate by becoming a possible source of global atmospheric [#permalink]
Thanks for the passage.

However, as others have mentioned, Q2. seems to be fairly difficult to comprehend. The answer choices are quite subjective.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 13 Sep 2025
Posts: 125
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
Re: climate by becoming a possible source of global atmospheric [#permalink]
Please post the explanation of Q3.
GRE Prep Club Team Member
Joined: 20 Feb 2017
Posts: 2508
Own Kudos [?]: 3973 [1]
Given Kudos: 1057
GPA: 3.39
Send PM
Re: climate by becoming a possible source of global atmospheric [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
Shivin wrote:
Please post the explanation of Q3.


3. Which statements would the author be likely to agree with? Select all that apply

Explanation

The passage says:

“Scientists don’t understand methane very well”

“Uncertainties still abound about the response of the Arctic system to climate change”

This matches the idea that interactions are not fully understood So (A) is Yes.

The passage says: “Carbon largely accumulates in permafrost” and contrasts it with surface decomposition. It also says the Arctic stores 400 million metric tons of CO2 yearly, and permafrost holds vast amounts historically. It strongly implies permafrost is the main reservoir so (B) is Yes.

The passage actually says:

Expansion of shrubs and northward movement of tree line “could sequester more carbon in vegetation”

But dry conditions may counteract that and fires could release more carbon. So the author does not state that shrub growth will cause more CO2 release, in fact, it’s presented as something that could take up carbon, though maybe outweighed by other factors. So (C) is not supported as something the author would agree with directly.

Answer: A,B
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 34075
Own Kudos [?]: 40513 [0]
Given Kudos: 26629
Send PM
climate by becoming a possible source of global atmospheric [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Question 1

1. Based on the information in the passage, which of the following would not be likely to increase the amount of carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere?

We need to identify the factor that either decreases $\(\mathrm{CO}_2\)$ or only increases $\(\mathrm{CH}_4\)$ (which is a greenhouse gas, but not carbon dioxide).

- A) An increased rate of decomposition of surface organic matter in the Arctic: The passage states warmer temperatures accelerate decomposition, releasing more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere (Paragraph 4). (Increases CO2)

- B) Thawing of the Arctic permafrost: This exposes frozen soil to decomposition, releasing more carbon (Paragraph 4). (Increases CO2)

- C$)$ An increase in the rate of release of Arctic methane: Methane $\(\left(\mathrm{CH}_4\right)\)$ is a separate gas. While it is a potent greenhouse gas that accelerates global warming, the passage does not state that the release of methane directly increases atmospheric carbon dioxide ( $\(\mathrm{CO}_2\)$ ). (Increases $\(\mathrm{CH}_4\)$, but not $\(\mathrm{CO}_2\)$ )

- D) Longer growing seasons in the Arctic: The passage states longer growing seasons "promote plant photosynthesis, which removes carbon dioxide from the atmosphere" (Paragraph 6). (Decreases CO2)

- E) An increased number of fires in the Arctic: The passage states dry conditions lead to "increased fire prevalence, releasing even more carbon" (Paragraph 6). (Increases CO2)

Both (C) and (D) are technically correct, but the question asks which factor would not be likely to increase the amount of carbon dioxide ( $\(\mathrm{CO}_2\)$ ).

- (D) actively decreases $\(\mathrm{CO}_2\)$ (via photosynthesis).
- (C) increases $\(\mathrm{CH}_4\)$, not $\(\mathrm{CO}_2\)$.

In reading comprehension questions, the answer that presents a clear countervailing force directly mentioned in the text (like photosynthesis) is the stronger answer unless the $\(\mathrm{CH}_4\)$ is clearly linked to $\(\mathrm{CO}_2\)$ production (which it is not here). However, since $\(\mathrm{CH}_4\)$ is not $\(\mathrm{CO}_2\)$, and $\(\mathrm{CO}_2\)$ is the specific gas mentioned, (C) is also technically correct. Given the options, (D) is the only one described as actively removing $\(\mathrm{CO}_2\)$.

Answer for Question 1: D
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 34075
Own Kudos [?]: 40513 [0]
Given Kudos: 26629
Send PM
climate by becoming a possible source of global atmospheric [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Question 2

2. Based on the information in the passage, how likely is it that the Arctic will become a significant source of global atmospheric carbon dioxide?

The passage presents strong arguments for this outcome but ends with significant uncertainties.
- Arguments FOR becoming a source: Rapid warming, accelerated decomposition, permafrost thawing, and available trapped carbon (Paragraph 4).
- Arguments AGAINST becoming a source/Uncertainties: Longer growing seasons and shrub expansion promote photosynthesis, which removes $\(\mathrm{CO}_2\)$ (Paragraph 6). The final sentence confirms: "But uncertainties still abound about the response of the Arctic system to climate change."

Because the text outlines a clear mechanism for the switch (warming/thawing) but concludes by stating "uncertainties still abound" and lists powerful opposing factors (photosynthesis), we cannot conclude that the outcome is certain or very likely. It is presented as a strong possibility, but one mitigated by known unknowns.
- A/B/C: Certain, Nearly certain, Very likely-Too definitive, contradicts the final paragraph.
- D) Fairly likely-This best captures the author's tone: there is high concern and a clear mechanism for the switch, but the outcome is not guaranteed due to competing factors.
- E) Unlikely-Contradicts the overall alarming tone of the passage.

Answer for Question 2: D
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 34075
Own Kudos [?]: 40513 [0]
Given Kudos: 26629
Send PM
Re: climate by becoming a possible source of global atmospheric [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Question 3

3. Which statements would the author be likely to agree with? Select all that apply
- A) Scientists do not fully understand the dynamic interactions that lead to climate change.
- The passage states: "But uncertainties still abound about the response of the Arctic system to climate change," and "Scientists don't understand methane very well." → AGREE
- B) Most of the carbon stored in the Arctic is in permafrost.
- The passage states: "Carbon generally enters the oceans and land masses of the Arctic from the atmosphere and largely accumulates in permafrost..." (Paragraph 3). The implication is that the bulk of the trapped carbon is in the frozen soil layer. → AGREE
- C) As more shrubs grow in the tundra as a result of warming trends, it is likely that more carbon dioxide will be released into the atmosphere, resulting in further warming.
- The passage presents shrub expansion as a negative feedback mechanism: "the expansion of shrubs in tundra... could sequester more carbon in vegetation." The author then notes that dry conditions might counteract these effects, but the initial effect of shrubs is carbon removal, not release. → DISAGREE

Answer for Question 3: A and B
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 34075
Own Kudos [?]: 40513 [0]
Given Kudos: 26629
Send PM
Re: climate by becoming a possible source of global atmospheric [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Question 4

4. Identify the sentence in which the author speculates that possible factors offsetting the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide in the Arctic will be outweighed by other factors.

We are looking for the point where the author introduces a positive (offsetting) factor, and then immediately argues that this positive factor may be neutralized or overcome by a negative one.

The positive factors (longer growing seasons, shrub expansion) are introduced in Paragraph 6. The sentence that weighs these factors against the negatives is the one immediately following:
"However, increasingly dry conditions may counteract and overcome these effects."
This sentence states that the negative factor ("increasingly dry conditions") may counteract and overcome the positive factors (plant growth/sequestration), meaning the negative effects will be weightier.

Answer for Question 4: "However, increasingly dry conditions may counteract and overcome these effects."
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 34075
Own Kudos [?]: 40513 [0]
Given Kudos: 26629
Send PM
Re: climate by becoming a possible source of global atmospheric [#permalink]
Expert Reply
GeminiHeat wrote:
Shivin wrote:
Please post the explanation of Q3.


3. Which statements would the author be likely to agree with? Select all that apply

Explanation

The passage says:

“Scientists don’t understand methane very well”

“Uncertainties still abound about the response of the Arctic system to climate change”

This matches the idea that interactions are not fully understood So (A) is Yes.

The passage says: “Carbon largely accumulates in permafrost” and contrasts it with surface decomposition. It also says the Arctic stores 400 million metric tons of CO2 yearly, and permafrost holds vast amounts historically. It strongly implies permafrost is the main reservoir so (B) is Yes.

The passage actually says:

Expansion of shrubs and northward movement of tree line “could sequester more carbon in vegetation”

But dry conditions may counteract that and fires could release more carbon. So the author does not state that shrub growth will cause more CO2 release, in fact, it’s presented as something that could take up carbon, though maybe outweighed by other factors. So (C) is not supported as something the author would agree with directly.

Answer: A,B


Thank you sir
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: climate by becoming a possible source of global atmospheric [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
234 posts
GRE Instructor
1106 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne