Last visit was: 26 Jan 2026, 13:25 It is currently 26 Jan 2026, 13:25

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 34557
Own Kudos [?]: 40850 [0]
Given Kudos: 26685
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 34557
Own Kudos [?]: 40850 [0]
Given Kudos: 26685
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 34557
Own Kudos [?]: 40850 [0]
Given Kudos: 26685
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 34557
Own Kudos [?]: 40850 [0]
Given Kudos: 26685
Send PM
Re: Unlike Mercury and Mars, Venus has a dense, opaque atmosphere that pre [#permalink]
Expert Reply
EXPLANATION QUESTION #3


The credited answer is (C). The passage explicitly says that the catastrophic idea of Noah's Flood, a biblical story, was something Geology had to fight against to be successful. Therefore, we know of at least one previous religious model that did not serve as a sound basis for their modern analytical theories.

The author seems to value Geology, implying that it has "success ... as a serious science." That's high praise. The author certainly doesn't doubt its legitimacy. Choice (A) is incorrect.

The passage clearly describe geologist discussing other planets and moons as readily as they discuss Earth. In fact, the geological models of all other planets (besides Venus) and all other moons are very successful. Nothing in the passage suggests that geological analyses of other moons \& planets is any less valid or any less appropriate than analyses of Earth. Choice (B) is incorrect.

Choice (D) has extreme language. The passage certainly implies that we can figure out a certain amount about the surface of Mercury from Earth-based observations, but everything? absolutely everything? As if landing on Mercury and walking around would not reveal a single iota more than we are already able to see through our telescopes? That's just wildly unreasonable! Choice (D) is incorrect.

The passage talks about theories of a "catastrophist" model, involving large-scale planet-wide changes, but this is quite different from the ordinary use of the word "catastrophe", meaning a "disaster" --- this ordinary sense is not used anywhere in the passage. Choice ( $E$ ) is incorrect.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 34557
Own Kudos [?]: 40850 [0]
Given Kudos: 26685
Send PM
Re: Unlike Mercury and Mars, Venus has a dense, opaque atmosphere that pre [#permalink]
Expert Reply
EXPLANATION QUESTION #4


The credited answer is (C). The passage explicitly says that the catastrophic idea of Noah's Flood, a biblical story, was something Geology had to fight against to be successful. Therefore, we know of at least one previous religious model that did not serve as a sound basis for their modern analytical theories.

The author seems to value Geology, implying that it has "success ... as a serious science." That's high praise. The author certainly doesn't doubt its legitimacy. Choice (A) is incorrect.

The passage clearly describe geologist discussing other planets and moons as readily as they discuss Earth. In fact, the geological models of all other planets (besides Venus) and all other moons are very successful. Nothing in the passage suggests that geological analyses of other moons \& planets is any less valid or any less appropriate than analyses of Earth. Choice (B) is incorrect.

Choice (D) has extreme language. The passage certainly implies that we can figure out a certain amount about the surface of Mercury from Earth-based observations, but everything? absolutely everything? As if landing on Mercury and walking around would not reveal a single iota more than we are already able to see through our telescopes? That's just wildly unreasonable! Choice (D) is incorrect.

The passage talks about theories of a "catastrophist" model, involving large-scale planet-wide changes, but this is quite different from the ordinary use of the word "catastrophe", meaning a "disaster" --- this ordinary sense is not used anywhere in the passage. Choice ( $E$ ) is incorrect.
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: Unlike Mercury and Mars, Venus has a dense, opaque atmosphere that pre [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
234 posts
GRE Instructor
1106 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne