Re: The conjecture regarding (i) _______ water-ice sublimation rates in th
[#permalink]
05 May 2026, 04:49
The answers are B and D.
The sentence is saying that a hypothesis about how water-ice sublimation behaves in polar regions cannot be confirmed without long-term data. That data must help identify the factors that trigger sublimation and subsequent loss of volatile compounds.
Blank (i):
We need something that fits naturally with “sublimation rates” and sounds like a scientifically reasonable pattern that requires longitudinal (over time) data.
A. anomalous spikes in: This suggests rare, irregular bursts. While possible, the sentence is not emphasizing irregularity—it is talking about a pattern that needs sustained observation. Also, “conjecture regarding anomalous spikes” feels less standard than a general pattern.
B. periodically fluctuating: This means changing over time in a repeating pattern. This fits perfectly with the need for longitudinal data, since periodic behavior can only be confirmed over time.
C. monotonically escalating: This means steadily increasing without decrease. That’s too rigid and unlikely for natural sublimation processes, and doesn’t align with the need to study variability.
Blank (ii):
Now we need the process that gets initiated, leading to dissipation of volatile compounds. So, the sequence is drivers → initiate something → that leads to dissipation
D. volatilization: Volatilization means turning into vapor. This is exactly what leads to loss/dissipation of volatile compounds. Perfect fit.
E. sequestration: Sequestration means trapping or isolating substances. That’s the opposite of dissipation.
F. attenuation: Attenuation means weakening or reducing. This doesn’t describe the process that leads to dissipation; it’s more of a gradual reduction, not the triggering mechanism.