Last visit was: 16 Sep 2026, 04:48 It is currently 16 Sep 2026, 04:48

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 36149
Own Kudos [?]: 43321 [1]
Given Kudos: 27243
Send PM
GRE Prep Club Team Member
Joined: 20 Feb 2017
Posts: 2928
Own Kudos [?]: 4481 [1]
Given Kudos: 1257
GPA: 3.39
Send PM
GRE Prep Club Team Member
Joined: 20 Feb 2017
Posts: 2928
Own Kudos [?]: 4481 [1]
Given Kudos: 1257
GPA: 3.39
Send PM
GRE Prep Club Team Member
Joined: 20 Feb 2017
Posts: 2928
Own Kudos [?]: 4481 [1]
Given Kudos: 1257
GPA: 3.39
Send PM
Re: The "platform decay" thesis advanced by Okonkwo and Das argues that th [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
Explanation

3. It can be inferred from the passage that the "skeptics" mentioned in the final sentence would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements about the "barbell" configuration?

The skeptics reject the defenders' optimism. They argue that the post-platform news market has developed a "barbell" configuration:

One end: A handful of lavishly funded global brands dominate traffic.
Other end: A large number of under-resourced outlets compete for minimal advertising revenue.
Missing middle: Mid-tier metropolitan newspapers and regional broadcasters-described as the "backbone of accountability journalism"-are disappearing.

The implication is that the market is becoming polarized, with very few well-funded organizations and many poorly funded ones.

A. It consigns a substantial portion of working journalists to positions within organizations that lack the resources necessary for sustained investigative reporting. Correct.

This is the natural inference from the passage.

The skeptics emphasize:

-a vast underclass of under-resourced outlets, and
-the disappearance of the well-funded mid-tier institutions that historically performed accountability journalism.

If most remaining outlets are under-resourced, then many journalists would likely lack the resources needed for expensive investigative work.

This follows directly from the passage.

B. It represents a necessary transitional phase...Opposite of the skeptics' view. This is the defenders' argument, which skeptics explicitly challenge.

C. It disproportionately disadvantages highly educated audiences. No support.

D. It constitutes a net increase in the total number of outlets...Unsupported.

E. The skeptics discuss the distribution of resources, not the total number of outlets. It undermines the market position of the largest global brands. Exactly the opposite.

The passage says those brands dominate the traffic stream.

Answer: A
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: The "platform decay" thesis advanced by Okonkwo and Das argues that th [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
275 posts
GRE Instructor
1151 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne