Re: That the CEO is widely regarded as aloof, even coldly indifferent to
[#permalink]
27 Jul 2026, 04:00
Answer: B. unfounded
Why: The sentence structure sets up a contrast: the CEO's reputation ("aloof, even coldly indifferent") is being challenged by evidence that follows the semicolon. The word "turns out" signals that the initial perception will be shown to be incorrect.
The evidence presented is comprehensive and directly contradicts the reputation - she personally checks in with staff, defends juniors to the board unprompted, and insists on collaboration. This isn't a partial correction (which would suggest the reputation has some truth to it), but a full reversal - the described behaviors are the opposite of aloof/indifferent.
"Unfounded" captures this precisely: it means lacking any real basis or evidence, which matches a reputation being completely undercut by facts.
Why the others fail:
A. widespread - doesn't fit logically; the sentence isn't commenting on how common the perception is, but whether it's true.
C. exaggerated - implies the reputation has a kernel of truth that's been overstated. But the evidence shows behavior that's essentially opposite to aloofness, not just a milder version of it - this makes "exaggerated" too soft a fit compared to "unfounded."
D. warranted - means justified/deserved, which is the opposite of what the evidence shows.
E. anecdotal - means based on individual accounts rather than solid evidence; this describes a type of evidence, not whether the reputation is accurate, so it doesn't logically complete the sentence's contrast.