GRE Prep Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Interestingly enough, it could be argued that a parallel
[#permalink]
23 Oct 2017, 08:18
23 Oct 2017, 08:18
1
Expert Reply
2
Bookmarks
00:00
Question Stats:
45% (01:23) correct
54% (01:06) wrong based on 103 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Most readers of Nietzsche’s Beyond Good and Evil probably remember it as a collection of poetic aphorisms, each standing alone; these readers missed or have forgotten the linear (i) _________ arcing through the work. Interestingly enough, it could be argued that a parallel cognitive gulf pervades the book itself. While Nietzsche rails against the (ii) “_________” of earlier philosophers and contrasts it to the ideal of the “free spirit,” unencumbered by religions and prejudices, he then espouses the possibility of (iii) _________ —such an ordering of spiritual strength seemingly undercuts the notion of an independent spirit.
| Blank (i) | Blank (ii) | Blank (iii) |
| (A) chaos | (D) dogmatism | (G) conjuring seraphs |
| (B) progression | (E) hedonism | (H) a new philosophy |
| (C) stasis | (F) morality | (I) constructing a hierarchy |
Practice Questions
Question: 49
Page: 58
Question: 49
Page: 58
Re: Interestingly enough, it could be argued that a parallel
[#permalink]
25 Oct 2017, 18:24
25 Oct 2017, 18:24
Some help here please!
Re: Interestingly enough, it could be argued that a parallel
[#permalink]
26 Oct 2017, 02:20
26 Oct 2017, 02:20
1
Expert Reply
Most of the readers of Nietzsche's book think something of these. BUT at the same time they have no a clear big picture, or progression, of these same work.
At this point the question has a shift from what the readers think to what Nietzsche thinks about the book itself and how it was conceived.
It is true that Nietzsche n this book says that doesn't exist the dogmatism that other philosophers stand out, but at the same time he does not rule out completely a form of constructing a hierarchy for constructing a spirit.
Hope this helps
At this point the question has a shift from what the readers think to what Nietzsche thinks about the book itself and how it was conceived.
It is true that Nietzsche n this book says that doesn't exist the dogmatism that other philosophers stand out, but at the same time he does not rule out completely a form of constructing a hierarchy for constructing a spirit.
Hope this helps
