Last visit was: 17 Nov 2024, 12:48 It is currently 17 Nov 2024, 12:48

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 29964
Own Kudos [?]: 36255 [18]
Given Kudos: 25912
Send PM
Most Helpful Community Reply
User avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Nov 2018
Posts: 24
Own Kudos [?]: 111 [12]
Given Kudos: 0
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Send PM
General Discussion
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Nov 2017
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 29964
Own Kudos [?]: 36255 [0]
Given Kudos: 25912
Send PM
Re: She claims it is possible to deduce matters of fact fro [#permalink]
Expert Reply
License for two main reasons: first off, because with POE is the only word that fits the bill. Secondly,

The laws of logic, in her opinion, (ii)__________her proclamation that “existence exists,” which is very much like saying that the law of thermodynamics is hot.

License give her the authority to proclaim that “existence exists.

Hope this helps. Ask if ay is unclear to you.

regards
avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 09 Nov 2018
Posts: 505
Own Kudos [?]: 133 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: She claims it is possible to deduce matters of fact fro [#permalink]
1
why is not blank 1 warrant?................This line is from book "The Reactionary Mind: Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Sarah Palin"
By Corey Robin. Over there it is warrant. please explain.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 29964
Own Kudos [?]: 36255 [1]
Given Kudos: 25912
Send PM
Re: She claims it is possible to deduce matters of fact fro [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
Warrant means permission. authorization or a legal document.

Epigram is a remark expressing an idea.

Warrant is completely out of scope

I hope now is more clear.

Regards
GRE Instructor
Joined: 24 Dec 2018
Posts: 1065
Own Kudos [?]: 1424 [2]
Given Kudos: 24
Send PM
Re: She claims it is possible to deduce matters of fact fro [#permalink]
2
The word epigram has a literary connotation and it is the wrong word to put there. With just as little "fallacy" actually sounds good, because the kind of claims she makes does not seem very sensible or acceptable. How does one deduce matters of fact from logic? It seems to imply the exercise is in-sensible.

But warrant is also okay there, though the phrase "with just as little warrant, aims to derive..." sounds weird.

Also, deduce, logic and fallacy are all terms from logic and so my first preference is fallacy, and then warrant and last would be epigram.
avatar
Active Member
Active Member
Joined: 03 Apr 2019
Posts: 195
Own Kudos [?]: 276 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: She claims it is possible to deduce matters of fact fro [#permalink]
The clue for the sentence is little ( so epigram means a short pithy saying) so it matches here. License, is the correct word for the second blank.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2020
Posts: 440
Own Kudos [?]: 60 [0]
Given Kudos: 68
Send PM
Re: She claims it is possible to deduce matters of fact fro [#permalink]
question is same level as official one?
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Nov 2021
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: She claims it is possible to deduce matters of fact fro [#permalink]
The following official solution has been given for this exact question on page 126 of 543 of Manhattan official guide 8 for Text Completion and Sentence Equivalence (4th Edition):

Question 20 official answer: Warrant, license.

Official Explanation: It is clear from “claims” and the generally derisive tone of the sentence that the author does not think it is possible to deduce matters of fact from logic (that would be pretty silly, come to think about it). Thus, the “she” who is the subject of the text has little warrant (justification) for doing this, and just as little warrant for using logic to inappropriately derive other “truths.” A fallacy is a “mistaken belief, especially one based on unsound argument”—she has lots of fallacies, not the dearth of fallacy indicated by “just as little.” An epigram is a “witticism” or “quip,” an extra meaning not indicated by any clues. License is similar to warrant and serves the same function in the second sentence. The “laws of logic” do not occlude (close, cover, or obstruct) or galvanize (spur to action) “her proclamation.”

Having completely solved Manhattah 5lb, all 5 Manhattan mocks and many of their topic specific GRE guides, have found 12+ mistakes across all their materials. To err is human- therefore, request users to log onto the Manhattan online portal where they post a list of corrections across their materials.

Best wishes.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 Feb 2023
Posts: 9
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
Re: She claims it is possible to deduce matters of fact fro [#permalink]
1
Blank (i): (B) warrant
Blank (ii): (F) galvanize

Explanation:
The sentence talks about how the person in question believes that it is possible to deduce matters of fact from logic, and that she also aims to derive ethical and economic truths from the same. The word "just as little" suggests that the person is confident in her ability to do so without much difficulty or hesitation. The word that would best fit in the first blank is "warrant", meaning to justify or give authority for something. The person believes that logic gives her the authority to deduce matters of fact and derive ethical and economic truths.

In the second part of the sentence, the speaker refers to the "proclamation that 'existence exists,'" which is compared to a physical law like the law of thermodynamics. The word that would best fit in the second blank is "galvanize", meaning to stimulate or excite into action. The person believes that the laws of logic support her proclamation and give it strength and validity, much like the law of thermodynamics is a well-established and accepted concept in the field of physics.

What do you guys think of my explanation, do you think it makes sense?
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Jan 2021
Posts: 1688
Own Kudos [?]: 53 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: She claims it is possible to deduce matters of fact fro [#permalink]
Hello from the GRE Prep Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GRE Prep Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: She claims it is possible to deduce matters of fact fro [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
234 posts
GRE Instructor
1065 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne