Re: She claims it is possible to deduce matters of fact fro
[#permalink]
30 Dec 2021, 05:19
The following official solution has been given for this exact question on page 126 of 543 of Manhattan official guide 8 for Text Completion and Sentence Equivalence (4th Edition):
Question 20 official answer: Warrant, license.
Official Explanation: It is clear from “claims” and the generally derisive tone of the sentence that the author does not think it is possible to deduce matters of fact from logic (that would be pretty silly, come to think about it). Thus, the “she” who is the subject of the text has little warrant (justification) for doing this, and just as little warrant for using logic to inappropriately derive other “truths.” A fallacy is a “mistaken belief, especially one based on unsound argument”—she has lots of fallacies, not the dearth of fallacy indicated by “just as little.” An epigram is a “witticism” or “quip,” an extra meaning not indicated by any clues. License is similar to warrant and serves the same function in the second sentence. The “laws of logic” do not occlude (close, cover, or obstruct) or galvanize (spur to action) “her proclamation.”
Having completely solved Manhattah 5lb, all 5 Manhattan mocks and many of their topic specific GRE guides, have found 12+ mistakes across all their materials. To err is human- therefore, request users to log onto the Manhattan online portal where they post a list of corrections across their materials.
Best wishes.