Last visit was: 10 Nov 2024, 10:24 It is currently 10 Nov 2024, 10:24

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 16 May 2014
Posts: 592
Own Kudos [?]: 2040 [22]
Given Kudos: 0
GRE 1: Q165 V161
Send PM
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 16 May 2014
Posts: 592
Own Kudos [?]: 2040 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
GRE 1: Q165 V161
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 Mar 2017
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [2]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 May 2016
Posts: 33
Own Kudos [?]: 29 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Sparva, unlike Trelands other provinces [#permalink]
1
yeah, E is true
because the question asks for something that strengthens the"ARGUMENT OF THE PASSAGE"
and he stated that Sparva's insurers pay much although the city has a small population,
then you can conclude that there's less traffic accident there.
then answer choice E is the best answer that supports the author's questioning.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 May 2016
Posts: 33
Own Kudos [?]: 29 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Sparva, unlike Trelands other provinces [#permalink]
4
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Apr 2018
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Sparva, unlike Trelands other provinces [#permalink]
1
This one was really puzzling to me. The wording completely confounded me. Thanks for posting the link to the reddit post. One of the comments there was the most lucid explanations I found for this problem.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 13 Apr 2018
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Sparva, unlike Trelands other provinces [#permalink]
Answer is E.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Jun 2018
Posts: 13
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Sparva, unlike Trelands other provinces [#permalink]
A) E
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Jul 2018
Posts: 33
Own Kudos [?]: 22 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Sparva, unlike Trelands other provinces [#permalink]
1
The answer is E since it states the specific reason why insurers in Sparva pay for more treatments - because there is fewer accidents. Other choices are off the mark.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Apr 2018
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [4]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Sparva, unlike Trelands other provinces [#permalink]
3
1
Bookmarks
This is a phenomenon-hypothesis type argument:
Phenomenon - Insurers in Sparva pay for far more treatments after accidents than insurers in other provinces.
Hypothesis/Explanation - Sparva’s less restrictive policy

In this argument, the author assumes Sparva’s less restrictive policy is the only explanation for insurers paying for far more treatments.
To weaken this type of argument, you say that there is an alternate explanation/hypothesis
To strengthen, you do the opposite i.e you block an alternate explanation.

Now, can you find out an alternate explanation? Well, there may be more number of accidents than the average and that is why insurers had to pay for more treatments.
If you block this case, you get choice E as answer.
User avatar
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 10 Feb 2020
Posts: 496
Own Kudos [?]: 346 [0]
Given Kudos: 299
Send PM
Re: Sparva, unlike Trelands other provinces [#permalink]
1
Choice E strengthen because Sparva's policy is less restricted, population is less therefore accidents are less. Less restricted policy means no matter how many times anyone has had accident, that person is insured and will be treated no. of times under the conditions of insurance.
That's what I understood.
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Oct 2019
Posts: 114
Own Kudos [?]: 60 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Sparva, unlike Trelands other provinces [#permalink]
Took me 4.5 min but got it right.
The reason stated, tpo be supported: POLICY IS THE REASON FOR PAYING MORE
TO strengthen: we need to eliminate any reason that can contradict this fact
1. the population might be greater (author already mentioned a detail about this)
2. there are more accidents- we eliminate this

I found BCD irrelevant.


pls give a kudos
Manager
Manager
Joined: 19 Feb 2021
Posts: 183
Own Kudos [?]: 178 [1]
Given Kudos: 425
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: Sparva, unlike Trelands other provinces [#permalink]
1
You are looking for an answer with evidence that could support the argument.

To build the argument, there are two key facts: Fact 1: Sparva's policy requires insurers to pay for all medical treatment from accidents without restrictions or preapproval. Other provinces have more restrictive policies. Fact 2: Insurers in Sparva pay for far more treatments than insurers in other provinces, although Sparva's population is not the largest.

Conclusion of the Argument: Because of these facts, Sparva's unique policy must be the reason why insurers pay much more money for treatment here than other provinces.

You're looking for a choice that supports this conclusion AND the method used to argue it.

A- The cost of car insurance has nothing to do with the amount of money insurers pay out. So, not A

B- The cost of medical care in Sparva being higher would actually cause the amount insurers pay to rise. HOWEVER--while this corresponds to the fact that insurers pay more, it has nothing to do with the facts that led the author to her conclusion. In other words, it would be a separate argument to explain why insurers pay more, but it doesn't strengthen the argument the author laid out in this passage. In fact, it weakens the argument. If the cost of medical care is higher, that could be the cause of increased payouts, not the less restrictive policy. So, not B.

C- If true, this doesn't change the facts or the conclusion built on them. It's irrelevant. So, not C

D- We're talking about the amount paid out as a whole, so the number of insurers is irrelevant. Could be less than other provinces, could be more. Doesn't matter. So, not D

E- If there are fewer accidents in Sparva than other places, but the overall cost of treatment is higher (as stated in Fact 2), it means that the average cost per accident is higher in Sparva than any other province. This would support the conclusion that insurers pay more in Sparva than other provinces.
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Jan 2021
Posts: 1680
Own Kudos [?]: 53 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Sparva, unlike Trelands other provinces [#permalink]
Hello from the GRE Prep Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GRE Prep Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: Sparva, unlike Trelands other provinces [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
234 posts
GRE Instructor
1063 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne