A beautiful passage with very clear answers. Got all correct in 7 mins 25 secs.
Quick Gist:The passage goes on to describe famous sculptor Louise Nevelson(LN). It begins with giving background as to why it is remarkable that LN is such a renowned sculptor. It talks about the history of that art in the US. Further goes on to talk about the responses of critics and also her own take on what inspires her & what she thinks about art. The last para talks about the details of her sculptures ( the form, colors used and also the underpinnings of religion) and the author ends by stating that LN belongs to a category of her own!
Need to realize the main point is LN and her art itself.1. The passage focuses primarily on which of the following? (A) A general tendency in twentieth-century art
Too vague to be the primary focus(B) The work of a particular artist
BINGO - more than 2/3rds of the passage focusses on LN and hence this is it.(C) The artistic influences on women sculptors
Again, too narrow if not completely wrong. Influences of what? On what? Vague at best.(D) Critical responses to twentieth-century sculpture
No critical responses are given - just a few praises showered on a single artist(E) Materials used by twentieth-century sculptors
TRAP - too detailed to be the primary focus & also materials used only by LN are mentionedTricky question as not much is given by the question stem - need to carefully go through the answer choices eliminating one by one and also keeping an eye out for some obvious thing mentioned or implied in the passage2. Which of the following statements is supported by information given in the passage? (A) Since 1945 women sculptors in the United States have produced more sculpture than have men sculptors.
"...produced more sculptors than have men..." not at all mentioned and hence cannot be inferred.(B) Since 1950 sculpture produced in the United States has been the most original and creative sculpture produced anywhere.
Again too extreme this "most original and creative" discard.(C) From 1900 to 1950 women sculptors in Europe enjoyed more recognition for their work than did women sculptors in the United States.
We have only been told that women sculptors faced more hardships and this US vs. Europe comparison cannot be inferred. Discard.(D) Prior to 1945 there were many women sculptors whose work was ignored by critics.
TRAP - this is a half enticing option. Critics have been blamed of ignoring sculptors prior to the NEw York scene but "there were many women sculptors" is what makes it extreme and incorrect.(E) Prior to 1945 there was little major sculpture produced by men or women sculptors working in the United States.
Perfect - this is what is mentioned in the first paraWhen trying to ascertain the reason behind something in the passage the first order of business is to look around to the closest vicinity for context3. The author quotes Hilton Kramer most probably in order to illustrate which of the following? (A) The realism of Nevelson's work
"realism" is never discussed(B) The unique qualities of Nevelson's style
TRAP - this could be one way to look at it but this is way too neutral. THe author most definitely wants to praise LN and s using critics words to do it.(C) The extent of critical approval of Nevelson's work
PERFECT! Self-explanatory(D) A distinction between sculpture and painting
Egregious (E) A reason for the prominence of women sculptors since the 1950's
This is mere praise for LN and nothing moreThe lines referred are - "I have always wanted to show the world that art is everywhere, except that it has to pass through a creative mind."The two underlined parts are of importance (obviously depicting her approach to art) and we need to look out for things which could possibly symbolize those two. 4. Which of the following is one way in which Nevelson's art illustrates her theory as it is expressed in lines? (A) She sculpts in wood rather than in metal or stone.
What sets one apart from the other? Nothing. Discard.(B) She paints her sculptures and frames them in boxes.
So could so many other folks - nothing remarkable yet.(C) She makes no preliminary sketches but rather allows the sculpture to develop as she works.
Hold - could this signify "passage through the creative mind?" Discard as even sketches could signify the mind after all one has to use grey matter in either case.(D) She puts together pieces of ordinary objects once used for different purposes to make her sculptures.
Looks better than Option (C) - as ordinary objects signify the "art is everywhere" theme perfectly.(E) She does not deliberately attempt to convey symbolic or religious meanings through her sculpture.
Not noteworthy - infact author goes on to say the opposite about religious underpinnings in her work.Important to understand the author's tone to deal with this. The author is highly positive ( almost fanboy like ) towards LN ( and rightly so! ) Also, if none of the options make sense at first - we need to look more closely as you will see the obvious positive tone of the author is not asked in this question due to the options5. It can be inferred from the passage that the author believes which of the following about Nevelson's sculptures? (A) They suggest religious and symbolic meanings.
Hold - completely off track from what is was expected based on authors tone This is the right choice as the author does mention that the names and some sculptures have religious underpinnings even though LN denies it.(B) They do not have qualities characteristic of sculpture.
Negative outlook - opposite to author's approach.(C) They are mysterious and awe-inspiring, but not beautiful.
"Not beautiful?" Duh. No brainer to discard this one.(D) They are uniquely American in style and sensibility.
Again - the author never says that anything is "Yankee-like" about her. In fact, the self-description of LN tells us that she has been influenced by multiple cultures and regions of the world. No reason for the author to believe otherwise.(E) They show the influence of twentieth-century architecture.
Again TRAP - the art is a gray area between sculpture and architecture but nothing about "twentieth-century architecture" Hence discard. A tough one!FInally an easy detail question6. The author regards Nevelson's stature in the art world as "remarkable" in part because of which of the following? (A) Her work is currently overrated.
Opposite to what the author believes. She deserves all the praise she gets.(B) Women sculptors have found it especially difficult to be accepted and recognized as major artists.
Perfect - this is the continuation of the sentence after "remarkable" is used by the author(C) Nevelson's sculptures are difficult to understand.
Not false but is this why the author calls them "remarkable"? If you do not understand the reference take a hint from the proximity of the two things. (D) Many art critics have favored painting over sculpture in writing about developments in the art world.
Completly unrelated.(E) Few of the artists prominent in the twentieth century have been sculptors.
Again - TRAP - but in the context this is not what she is considered remarkableDetail question but not straightforward at all. Inference type so we need to be 100% sure of the correct choice.7. Which of the following statements about Nevelson's sculptures can be inferred from the passage? (A) They are meant for display outdoors.
Kept in boxes but not necessarily meant for the outdoors. Discard as we cannot be certain of this.(B) They are often painted in several colors.
180 opposite - few colors used - black white & golden. Discard.(C) They are sometimes very large.
Perfect! They sometimes take up the whole environment & there is no clear distinction between her art being either sculpture or architecture.(D) They are hand carved by Nevelson.
Tools are not mentioned.(E) They are built around a central wooden object.
All types of wooden objects from daily use are used. Discard.Hope this explanation is helpful.