GRE Prep Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Both books, although (i)___, are limited by lack of empirica
[#permalink]
02 Dec 2019, 11:53
02 Dec 2019, 11:53
Expert Reply
3
Bookmarks
00:00
Question Stats:
25% (01:14) correct
74% (01:37) wrong based on 83 sessions
Hide Show timer Statistics
Both books, although (i)______, are limited by lack of empirical data and cross-cultural and cross-racial comparisons that could strengthen their arguments. They are missing an honest discussion of how black women‘s superhuman strength can sometimes harm and stifle not just black women themselves but also black men, children, and others. This idea has been written off as a (ii) ______ stereotype circulated by whites and black men, who‘ve also been (iii) ______ by racialized notions of strength and weakness.
Kudos for the right answer and explanation
| Blank (i) | Blank (ii) | Blank (iii) |
|---|---|---|
| provincial | vicious | amused |
| interesting | transient | infuriated |
| abridged | hoary | victmized |
Kudos for the right answer and explanation
Re: Both books, although (i)___, are limited by lack of empirica
[#permalink]
05 Dec 2019, 12:56
05 Dec 2019, 12:56
2
1. The first blank requires a positive tone as "although" is used to oppose the tone of limitation of empirical data. Consequently, provincial does not suit here. Abridged is also a positive tone. Hence, only "interesting" suits here.
2. The third sentence says that the idea has been written off by some stereotype, which means that second blank requires more negative tone. Hoary and transient are not negative tones. Only vicious suits here.
3. Finally, in the third blank - whites and black men have "ALSO" been - suggests that it is an extension of what happened to women. Hence, only "victimised" suits here better.
2. The third sentence says that the idea has been written off by some stereotype, which means that second blank requires more negative tone. Hoary and transient are not negative tones. Only vicious suits here.
3. Finally, in the third blank - whites and black men have "ALSO" been - suggests that it is an extension of what happened to women. Hence, only "victimised" suits here better.
Re: Both books, although (i)___, are limited by lack of empirica
[#permalink]
29 Sep 2021, 20:40
29 Sep 2021, 20:40
arichinna wrote:
1. The first blank requires a positive tone as "although" is used to oppose the tone of limitation of empirical data. Consequently, provincial does not suit here. Abridged is also a positive tone. Hence, only "interesting" suits here.
2. The third sentence says that the idea has been written off by some stereotype, which means that second blank requires more negative tone. Hoary and transient are not negative tones. Only vicious suits here.
3. Finally, in the third blank - whites and black men have "ALSO" been - suggests that it is an extension of what happened to women. Hence, only "victimised" suits here better.
2. The third sentence says that the idea has been written off by some stereotype, which means that second blank requires more negative tone. Hoary and transient are not negative tones. Only vicious suits here.
3. Finally, in the third blank - whites and black men have "ALSO" been - suggests that it is an extension of what happened to women. Hence, only "victimised" suits here better.
How does "vicious" suit the second blank? There is no evidence of it whatsoever. Rather, "hoary", meaning overused or trite or commonplace, makes better sense IMO.
