Last visit was: 05 Nov 2024, 17:29 It is currently 05 Nov 2024, 17:29

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 29894
Own Kudos [?]: 36130 [13]
Given Kudos: 25919
Send PM
Most Helpful Community Reply
GRE Instructor
Joined: 24 Dec 2018
Posts: 1063
Own Kudos [?]: 1421 [13]
Given Kudos: 24
Send PM
General Discussion
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Jan 2020
Posts: 112
Own Kudos [?]: 274 [0]
Given Kudos: 97
Send PM
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 03 Dec 2019
Posts: 348
Own Kudos [?]: 947 [3]
Given Kudos: 0
Re: The dark regions in the starry night sky are not pockets in [#permalink]
3
mind wrote:
For q18, why not A?

I referred to these two lines to guide my answer to A "The average density of interstellar material in the vicinity of our Sun is 1,000 to 10,000 times less than the best terrestrial laboratory vacuum. It is only because of the enormous interstellar distances that so little material per unit of volume becomes so significant. "

I basically understood this line as the following: the density of interstellar material is so low due to enormous distances between stars. So A makes sense to me that "the density of interstellar material is higher where the distances between stars are shorter." Please explain why did I get this question wrong




Because of the fact that the interstellar distances are "enormous", the density (material per unit of volume) BECOMES so significant. That means if the distances were short, then the density would not become so significant. So, A is wrong.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 09 Jan 2020
Posts: 112
Own Kudos [?]: 274 [0]
Given Kudos: 97
Send PM
Re: The dark regions in the starry night sky are not pockets in [#permalink]
theBrahmaTiger wrote:
mind wrote:
For q18, why not A?

I referred to these two lines to guide my answer to A "The average density of interstellar material in the vicinity of our Sun is 1,000 to 10,000 times less than the best terrestrial laboratory vacuum. It is only because of the enormous interstellar distances that so little material per unit of volume becomes so significant. "

I basically understood this line as the following: the density of interstellar material is so low due to enormous distances between stars. So A makes sense to me that "the density of interstellar material is higher where the distances between stars are shorter." Please explain why did I get this question wrong




Because of the fact that the interstellar distances are "enormous", the density (material per unit of volume) BECOMES so significant. That means if the distances were short, then the density would not become so significant. So, A is wrong.



Got it now, thanks for the explanation
Manager
Manager
Joined: 30 Jun 2021
Posts: 52
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 15
Send PM
Re: The dark regions in the starry night sky are not pockets in [#permalink]
I didn't understand the correct answer of question 19. Option A seems more logical compared to variant C. Could you explain in a much simpler way pls?
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 29894
Own Kudos [?]: 36130 [0]
Given Kudos: 25919
Send PM
Re: The dark regions in the starry night sky are not pockets in [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Samamammadova8888 wrote:
I didn't understand the correct answer of question 19. Option A seems more logical compared to variant C. Could you explain in a much simpler way pls?


What means "seems more logical" ???
Manager
Manager
Joined: 30 Jun 2021
Posts: 52
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [1]
Given Kudos: 15
Send PM
Re: The dark regions in the starry night sky are not pockets in [#permalink]
1
Carcass wrote:
Samamammadova8888 wrote:
I didn't understand the correct answer of question 19. Option A seems more logical compared to variant C. Could you explain in a much simpler way pls?


What means "seems more logical" ???



"It is only because of the enormous interstellar distances that so little material per unit of volume becomes so significant"
Due to this sentence, can't we infer option A?
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 29894
Own Kudos [?]: 36130 [2]
Given Kudos: 25919
Send PM
Re: The dark regions in the starry night sky are not pockets in [#permalink]
2
Expert Reply
Ok

let try to understand the two options

the passage states clearly the following

Although its visual effect is so pronounced, dust is only a minor constituent of the material, extremely low in density, that lies between the stars.

The phrase above means that EVEN THOUGH dust is a minor part in the interstellar space ITS EFFECT to hide stars or planet is HUGE

so it comes to C as correct answer

However,

(A) little of the interstellar material in it seems substantial

First of all substantial is different from significant. Something could be important (significant) and NOT substantial

Secondly A is false because we do know that dust is NOT substantial. Itis a minor part of the interstellar material but its effect to obscure the celestial corps is HUGE. But its presence is a minor part. Most of the matter is made by

Dust accounts for about one percent of the total mass of interstellar matter. The rest is hydrogen and helium gas, with small amounts of other elements.

So, A is false

Honestly, I do not know why the students DO NOT read. It is simply this. Be focus and read.

IF all the students did this, the GRE would be a frolic through the park

Regards
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Apr 2022
Posts: 12
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 46
Send PM
Re: The dark regions in the starry night sky are not pockets in [#permalink]
Carcass wrote:
Samamammadova8888 wrote:
I didn't understand the correct answer of question 19. Option A seems more logical compared to variant C. Could you explain in a much simpler way pls?


What means "seems more logical" ???


Great explanation!! Carcass
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Jan 2021
Posts: 1679
Own Kudos [?]: 53 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The dark regions in the starry night sky are not pockets in [#permalink]
Hello from the GRE Prep Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GRE Prep Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: The dark regions in the starry night sky are not pockets in [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
228 posts
GRE Instructor
1063 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne