Last visit was: 22 Dec 2024, 12:57 It is currently 22 Dec 2024, 12:57

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30463
Own Kudos [?]: 36818 [2]
Given Kudos: 26100
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Sep 2020
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 24 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30463
Own Kudos [?]: 36818 [0]
Given Kudos: 26100
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Sep 2020
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 24 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: In the 1980's billions of batteries were thrown into landfil [#permalink]
1
thank you @carcass
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: In the 1980's billions of batteries were thrown into landfil [#permalink]
1
Sreya wrote:
hey @carcass doesn't option A, strengthens the argument. I thought the answer is b. how to tackle weaken type question?

OPTON B doesn't clearly specifies the difference in magnitudes of batteries. For instance, it may be possible that batteries in 1950s were 99.9 percent harmful and batteries in 1980's are 99.8 percent harmful(or visa versa).(So batteries are still harmful so doesn't weakens)
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 21 Aug 2020
Posts: 39
Own Kudos [?]: 32 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: In the 1980's billions of batteries were thrown into landfil [#permalink]
Someone please explain, I thought it was 'C'.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Jan 2021
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: In the 1980's billions of batteries were thrown into landfil [#permalink]
1
Carcass, is (A) the correct answer?
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30463
Own Kudos [?]: 36818 [0]
Given Kudos: 26100
Send PM
Re: In the 1980's billions of batteries were thrown into landfil [#permalink]
Expert Reply
strategist wrote:
Carcass, is (A) the correct answer?


yes Sir

Thank you
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Nov 2020
Posts: 22
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: In the 1980's billions of batteries were thrown into landfil [#permalink]
I couldn't decide between A and D. Why is D wrong?
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30463
Own Kudos [?]: 36818 [0]
Given Kudos: 26100
Send PM
Re: In the 1980's billions of batteries were thrown into landfil [#permalink]
Expert Reply
We need an explanation why the argument is weak.

A says that the studies referred to 1950 and basically they are no longer valid or old.

D instead talks about the leakage by the manufacture which is out of scope.

We care of the piles up, the amount in the dump NOT a flaw manufacture process

Regards
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Nov 2020
Posts: 22
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: In the 1980's billions of batteries were thrown into landfil [#permalink]
Carcass wrote:
We care of the piles up, the amount in the dump NOT a flaw manufacture process


Isn't the ending argument about the quality of ground water? So shouldn't the likelihood of a battery leak also play a role in this? Suppose there is a huge pile of batteries but they aren't that likely to leak vs. a relatively smaller pile but they are very likely to leak. Chances are, the the former would be better for ground water right?
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30463
Own Kudos [?]: 36818 [0]
Given Kudos: 26100
Send PM
In the 1980's billions of batteries were thrown into landfil [#permalink]
Expert Reply
The problem here is that the study in 1950 DOES NOT reflect the actual conditions

Compared to typical 1980's landfills, typical 1950's landfills contain a negligible number of batteries.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 29 Mar 2018
Posts: 22
Own Kudos [?]: 29 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
Re: In the 1980's billions of batteries were thrown into landfil [#permalink]
anasp99 wrote:
Someone please explain, I thought it was 'C'.




Option C if does something, it strengthens the argument. It shows that toxicity could have been higher in 1950s than 80s, if that were really the case - the argument that since the 1950s landfills were not contaminated, the 80s will also not be is weakened.
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Jan 2021
Posts: 1732
Own Kudos [?]: 54 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: In the 1980's billions of batteries were thrown into landfil [#permalink]
Hello from the GRE Prep Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GRE Prep Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: In the 1980's billions of batteries were thrown into landfil [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
234 posts
GRE Instructor
1066 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne