Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Your score will improve and your results will be more realistic
Is there something wrong with our timer?Let us know!
Language acquisition has long been thought of as a process of
[#permalink]
08 May 2021, 08:30
2
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
Language acquisition has long been thought of as a process of imitation and reinforcement. Children learn to speak, in the popular view, by copying the utterances heard around them, and by having their response strengthened by the repetitions, corrections, and other reactions that adults provide. In recent years, it has become clear that this principle will not explain all the facts of language development. Children do imitate a great deal, especially in learning sounds and vocabulary; but little of their grammatical ability can be explained in this way. Two kinds of evidence are commonly used in support of this — one based on the kind of language children produce, the other on what they do not produce.
The first piece of evidence derives from the way children handle irregular grammatical patterns. When they encounter such irregular past-tense forms as went and took or such plural forms as mice and sheep, there is a stage when they replace these by forms based on the regular patterns of the language. They say such things as wented, taked, mices, mouses, and sheeps. Evidently, children assume that grammatical usage is regular, and try to work out for themselves what the forms ‘ought’ to be — a reasoning process known as analogy. They could not have learned these forms by a process of imitation. The other kind of evidence is based on the way children seem unable to imitate adult grammatical constructions exactly, even when invited to do so.
Question 1
00:00
A
B
C
Question Stats:
41% (01:51) correct
59% (02:27) wrong based on 39 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
1. According to the passage, children cannot learn from a process of imitation alone for which of the following reasons?
A) Children copy adults even when adults intentionally use incorrect verb endings. B) When children are prompted to repeat a verb that follows an irregular ending they are unable to do so. C) Children tend to generate verb endings, that while incorrect, follow an established pattern.
Question 2
00:00
A
B
C
Question Stats:
39% (00:32) correct
61% (00:44) wrong based on 33 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
2. Which of the following grammatical constructions would be consistent with the “‘ought’” in the second paragraph?
A) ‘Bringed’ B) ‘Found’ C) ‘Geeses’
Question 3
00:00
A
B
C
Question Stats:
41% (00:45) correct
59% (00:42) wrong based on 32 sessions
HideShow
timer Statistics
3. Which of the following casts doubt on the “popular view”?
A) Upon hearing the word ‘goose’, a small child utters ‘gooses’ when a group of the birds flies by. B) A child continues to say ‘nobody don’t like me’, despite his mother repeatedly correcting him by saying, ‘nobody likes me.’ C) A 5-year-old girl, upon seeing a film, tells her friend, “I watched a film.”