malimah wrote:
please explain all the options of 2nd question...
The passage implies all of the following EXCEPT
A) world food production has kept pace with world population growth
...partly due to...innovations that allowed vast
increases in worldwide wheat production.
B) technological innovation is one factor that allowed for an increase in crop production
In the late nineteenth century, the
invention of the tractor staved off a Malthusian disaster
C) farmers are not the only group that has opposed artificial efforts to increase crop yield.
...largely due to farmers’ resistance...
...met with equal
resistance, this time
from the environmental movement.
D) the Malthusian limit might well have been reached if new methods to increase crop production had not been found
Nevertheless, the
Malthusian limit might still have been reached if crop yield had not been increased.
E) a Malthusian disaster
would have been ensured if it were not for the invention of genetic engineering
Even without direct genetic engineering, it is likely that science will discover new methods to
improve agricultural production.
The correct answer is E because the last sentence of the passage directly contradicts the answer choice.
The passage states generic engineering was not necessary to improve agricultural production.
As a hint, if the answer choice makes a strong claim or prediction, it must be supported by the passage.
Even without looking at the last sentence, you can infer from other paragraphs that a Malthusian disaster was already averted before the discovery of genetic engineering.
The second paragraph implies that invention of tractor prevented the Malthusian limit.
The third paragraph that nitrogen also contributed.