Last visit was: 18 Dec 2024, 04:56 It is currently 18 Dec 2024, 04:56

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30353
Own Kudos [?]: 36751 [12]
Given Kudos: 26080
Send PM
Most Helpful Expert Reply
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30353
Own Kudos [?]: 36751 [5]
Given Kudos: 26080
Send PM
General Discussion
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 May 2017
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [4]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Apr 2018
Posts: 67
Own Kudos [?]: 127 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Since a large amount of the ore frequently located in river [#permalink]
@carcass
I agree with @newtaraday. How do we know that underwater recovery is an expensive process?
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30353
Own Kudos [?]: 36751 [1]
Given Kudos: 26080
Send PM
Re: Since a large amount of the ore frequently located in river [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
IF the cost is less costly because the ore is abundant on the earth’s surface, then in deep water it IS expensive. And Vice-versa.

Ask for further assistance if you do need.

Regards
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Mar 2018
Posts: 39
Own Kudos [?]: 129 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
GRE 1: Q163 V149

GRE 2: Q168 V162
GPA: 3.5
Send PM
Re: Since a large amount of the ore frequently located in river [#permalink]
1
If the ore is abundant on the surface itself, why would we want to recover it from deep water?


Carcass wrote:
IF the cost is less costly because the ore is abundanton the earth’s surface, then id deep water it IS expensive. And Vice-versa.

Ask for further assistance if you do need.

Regards
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Apr 2018
Posts: 67
Own Kudos [?]: 127 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Since a large amount of the ore frequently located in river [#permalink]
Carcass wrote:
IF the cost is less costly because the ore is abundanton the earth’s surface, then id deep water it IS expensive. And Vice-versa.

Ask for further assistance if you do need.

Regards


Carcass
I feel that there should be a contrast word to signify the importance of deep water process. Isn't so?
For instance, Ore in earth's surface is abundant, but deep water ores are not inexpensive.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30353
Own Kudos [?]: 36751 [1]
Given Kudos: 26080
Send PM
Re: Since a large amount of the ore frequently located in river [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
Guys, this is not a critical reasoning question.

Considering that on the surface the ore is abundant and consequently the costs to obtain it are not that high, then in deep water, the process will not going to become inexpensive. It will more costly.

On the surface the cost is 10$, suppose, in deep water is 11$ (it must be higher for mandatorily, because of is reasonable to think that even the gasoline of the bathyscaphe cost more to go down at 1000 meters rather than 100 meters, just to make the idea), then 11$ is still more expensive than 10$.


Therefore, in comparison, it is very difficult that in deep water the costs will be at 9$ and on the surface will be stable at 10$.

Deepwater costs always will be \(>\) of the surface costs.

Regards
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30353
Own Kudos [?]: 36751 [0]
Given Kudos: 26080
Send PM
Re: Since a large amount of the ore frequently located in river [#permalink]
Expert Reply
[quote="novice07"]If the ore is abundant on the surface itself, why would we want to recover it from deep water?


This question is meaningless because we should not ask this about the question. It is npt a critical reasoning question.

Why we will pick the ore in deep water rather than on the surface.

You have to pick two words that best fit the meaning of the question as a whole.

regards
avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 09 Nov 2018
Posts: 505
Own Kudos [?]: 133 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Since a large amount of the ore frequently located in river [#permalink]
1
newtaraday wrote:
Thanks, Why is the second blank inexpensive? There appears be no logical link(without calling upon outside knowledge) between the abundance of of the ore on the land surface and the fact that a process of extracting ore in the river would be expensive.



May be we can think in this way...give emphases on underline part.

Since frequently located surface ore is (i)____________ and recovery is less costly; recovery of underwater ore is not (ii)____________ procedure.

frequently is hint for (i)

Less costly is hint for (ii)

Surface water is opposite of under water in this case

Hence the answer is logical.

_______________________________________
Let me know if I am wrong.

Originally posted by AE on 11 Dec 2018, 21:42.
Last edited by AE on 11 Dec 2018, 22:01, edited 1 time in total.
avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 09 Nov 2018
Posts: 505
Own Kudos [?]: 133 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Since a large amount of the ore frequently located in river [#permalink]
Carcass wrote:
IF the cost is less costly because the ore is abundant on the earth’s surface, then in deep water it IS expensive. And Vice-versa.

Ask for further assistance if you do need.

Regards


May be we can think in this way...give emphases on underline part.

Since frequently located surface ore is (i)____________ and less costly, recovery of underwater ore is not (ii)____________ procedure.

frequently is hint for (i)

Less costly is hint for (ii)

Surface water is opposite of under water in this case

Hence the answer is logical.
_______________________________________
Let me know if I am wrong.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2020
Posts: 440
Own Kudos [?]: 61 [0]
Given Kudos: 68
Send PM
Re: Since a large amount of the ore frequently located in river [#permalink]
i am not that knowledgeable.... question is missing some important clue to get correct answer...
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30353
Own Kudos [?]: 36751 [0]
Given Kudos: 26080
Send PM
Re: Since a large amount of the ore frequently located in river [#permalink]
Expert Reply
void wrote:
i am not that knowledgeable.... question is missing some important clue to get correct answer...



Since a large amount of the ore frequently located in riverbeds is (i)____________ on the earth’s surface, where the processing of chemicals is less costly, recovery of underwater ore is not likely to become a (ii)____________ procedure.

The two portions above are the clues to B and E as answers

I hope now is more clear

Regards
GRE Instructor
Joined: 24 Dec 2018
Posts: 1066
Own Kudos [?]: 1431 [1]
Given Kudos: 24
Send PM
Re: Since a large amount of the ore frequently located in river [#permalink]
1
Since a large amount of the ore frequently located in riverbeds is (i)____________ on the earth’s surface, where the processing of chemicals is less costly, recovery of underwater ore is not likely to become a (ii)____________ procedure.

The highlighted words clue us into abundant as the choice for the first blank.

And since the processing of the ore on the earth's surface is already less costly, recovery of underwater ore is not likely to become an inexpensive procedure.

We can easily reject valuable and rejected as choices for the second blank.
GRE Instructor
Joined: 24 Dec 2018
Posts: 1066
Own Kudos [?]: 1431 [1]
Given Kudos: 24
Send PM
Since a large amount of the ore frequently located in river [#permalink]
1
newtaraday wrote:
Thanks, Why is the second blank inexpensive? There appears be no logical link(without calling upon outside knowledge) between the abundance of of the ore on the land surface and the fact that a process of extracting ore in the river would be expensive.


The phrase "less costly" suggests a comparison with other methods of extraction, in this case underwater. Therefore, amongst the three choices, inexpensive fits well.

But you are right in your question, because less costly does not automatically imply inexpensive.

This is the problem with non-ETS questions. They are not perfect.

An ETS question is mathematical and even an English literature student can answer a science-related TC or SE or even an RC without bringing in outside knowledge, and vice versa.
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Jan 2021
Posts: 1730
Own Kudos [?]: 53 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Since a large amount of the ore frequently located in river [#permalink]
Hello from the GRE Prep Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GRE Prep Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: Since a large amount of the ore frequently located in river [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
234 posts
GRE Instructor
1066 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne