There has been much written on the benefits of studying abroad while
[#permalink]
07 Dec 2024, 05:13
Understanding the Question and the Sentence:
This sentence is discussing two key drawbacks of study abroad programs:
Curriculum Quality: Suggesting that the quality or substance of the study abroad programs’ curricula might be lacking.
Student Behavior: Indicating that without supervision, students might neglect to immerse themselves in the local culture, preferring instead to indulge in partying or superficial activities.
(i)__________of most programs’ curricula leaves much to be desired means?
The phrase "(i) __________ of most programs’ curricula leaves much to be desired" means that there is a significant deficiency or lack in a specific quality or attribute of the curricula of most programs. The term used to fill in blank (i) will specify what exactly is lacking.
For example, if the blank is filled with:
rigor: It would mean that the strictness or thoroughness of the curricula is not sufficient.
nuance: It would mean that the subtlety or detail in the curricula is inadequate.
advocacy: It would mean that the promotion or support within the curricula is insufficient.
So, the whole phrase implies that the curricula of most programs are not meeting expectations or standards in the aspect specified by the term in blank (i).
In the context provided, "rigor" is the most fitting term, suggesting that the thoroughness or strictness of the curricula leaves much to be desired, i.e., it is lacking or insufficient.
Also, without supervision, many students (ii)__________ the culture of their adopted countries in favor of revelry.
The blank (ii) is referring to the students' behavior of choosing partying over cultural immersion. Words like "ignore," "neglect," or "forsake" could fit here.
Example: "Also, without supervision, many students neglect the culture of their adopted countries in favor of revelry."
Here the word "shun" is the best fit