Hi! I hope I can provide some useful insights to you
I've loved the usage of advanced vocabulary words in your essay, but there seems to be some minor grammars here in there ("In order words" in the 2nd para, "an pivotal decision" in the 4th para) and some words sound a bit repetitive ("It might also just be possible" has two words that correlates to possibility, "might" and "possible", in the 3rd para ). You should at least put some time reviewing (only if you have the time). Also, I'll try to delve deep into the arguments you provided.
I like it that you provide a detailed example in the first argument, proving that "fewer" is a vague term and should not be taken at face value.
As for the 2nd argument, I believe your reasons could have been more compelling if you could prove that higher percentage of positive reviews does not necessarily correlate to good quality, probably by providing some logical fallacies such as:
1. The author states that only specific Super Screen movies have increased percentage in positive reviews. This does not prove that all the movies produced by Super Screen are actually good, and the majority may have been filled with negative reviews, leading to a decrease in attendance.
2. Since fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies, an increase in the percentage of positive reviews may not have a significant meaning. For example, the number of attendances reduced from 100 to 90 but the number of positive reviews remains at 10. Even though the number is constant, the percentage actually increases, which shows that there may have been no improvement in the quality of the movies.
I believe there are still more compelling arguments.
The third argument is really good and well-developed, proving that lack of awareness may not have that much impact to decreased viewership, and a survey may strengthen/weaken the author's argument.
Overall, your essay is excellent and I don't think you will have difficulties in the real GRE. Good job!