Explanation
Pre-thinking:
While this is worded like an inference-based question, we can treat it like an assumption-based question (strengthening the conclusion). It also has a clear conclusion and several premises on which that conclusion is based.
Conclusion: Using this tool, an assassin will be able to eliminate cases of mistaken identity.
Premises on which it is based:
i) Software technology that compares a suspect’s facial features or pace with those in records of biometric data can be hindered by a disguise.
ii) The tool can measure, from up to 200 meters away, the minute vibrations induced in clothing by someone’s heartbeat.
iii) Hearts differ in both shape and contraction patterns, so the details of heartbeats vary from person to person.
Prima facie, this appears logical. In order to get a correct assumption, we are looking to rule out any alternative explanations or weakeners. Let us assess the answer options.
(A)Significant research is going on to improve the accuracy of snipers.
This does not impact the conclusion in any way since it talks nothing about the new tool or the principles it uses. Irrelevant. Eliminate.
(B)The targets often escape the sniper by changing their appearance.
This is explicitly stated in the stimulus and cannot be a strengthener or an inference. Eliminate.
(C)World’s best makeup will also not be able to save a target from sniper once the new tool starts getting used.
This is the conclusion and cannot be a strengthener or an inference. Eliminate.
(D)The new tool is an improved version of the commonly used software.
This is actually a weakener, if at all, since it may still have the drawbacks of software technology. Eliminate.
(E)The minute vibrations induced in clothing by a person’s heartbeat cannot be manipulated
Correct answer. It rules out a weakener.
Answer: E