Last visit was: 23 Dec 2024, 03:18 It is currently 23 Dec 2024, 03:18

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
GRE Prep Club Team Member
Joined: 20 Feb 2017
Posts: 2506
Own Kudos [?]: 3676 [2]
Given Kudos: 1053
GPA: 3.39
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30484
Own Kudos [?]: 36827 [3]
Given Kudos: 26100
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 18 Jan 2022
Posts: 69
Own Kudos [?]: 52 [0]
Given Kudos: 144
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 Jan 2022
Posts: 71
Own Kudos [?]: 11 [0]
Given Kudos: 437
Send PM
Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]
Is this like a standard formula?

Carcass wrote:
Per capita expenditure = (Price x Volume)/ Population

So, for per capita expenditure to rise, any of 3 things have to happen
1) Price increases,
2) Volume increases,
3) Population decreases

Now, let's look at the choices

A) Will come back to this last.

B) Population increased. My formula tells me population can't increase. NOT B

C) High profit levels. Who gives a ****. NOT C

D) Generic drugs. Which means lower prices. My formula tells me prices need to increase. NOT D

E) No more marketing. Who gives a ****. NOT E.

A) That leaves us with A. Simple elimination. Now it could be possible that the new medications were more expensive. Higher prices. Satisfies my formula. Or the medications were not more expensive, but you don't know for sure. So, A is the "best" answer because all other choices are clearly wrong
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30484
Own Kudos [?]: 36827 [0]
Given Kudos: 26100
Send PM
Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Chaithraln2499 wrote:
Is this like a standard formula?

Carcass wrote:
Per capita expenditure = (Price x Volume)/ Population

So, for per capita expenditure to rise, any of 3 things have to happen
1) Price increases,
2) Volume increases,
3) Population decreases

Now, let's look at the choices

A) Will come back to this last.

B) Population increased. My formula tells me population can't increase. NOT B

C) High profit levels. Who gives a ****. NOT C

D) Generic drugs. Which means lower prices. My formula tells me prices need to increase. NOT D

E) No more marketing. Who gives a ****. NOT E.

A) That leaves us with A. Simple elimination. Now it could be possible that the new medications were more expensive. Higher prices. Satisfies my formula. Or the medications were not more expensive, but you don't know for sure. So, A is the "best" answer because all other choices are clearly wrong


if you mean the per capita expenditure I would say yes
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: For several years, per capita expenditure on prescription drugs in Vor [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
234 posts
GRE Instructor
1066 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne