Last visit was: 22 Dec 2024, 21:48 It is currently 22 Dec 2024, 21:48

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30475
Own Kudos [?]: 36824 [6]
Given Kudos: 26100
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Feb 2022
Posts: 2
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [3]
Given Kudos: 6
GRE 1: Q165 V151
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 04 Jul 2022
Posts: 8
Own Kudos [?]: 5 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2022
Posts: 73
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Re: Samuel Johnson criticizes Shakespeares characters for being less tha [#permalink]
Carcass, can you please help to translate affectation in this context?
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30475
Own Kudos [?]: 36824 [0]
Given Kudos: 26100
Send PM
Re: Samuel Johnson criticizes Shakespeares characters for being less tha [#permalink]
Expert Reply
The sentence mentions that the characters were less than natural. In this context affectation, which means basically the same thing= not natural, is there to reinforce that concept earlier mentioned.

it is the only way to interpret the sentence as it is.

Ask if something is still unclear or needs further assistance

regards
GRE Instructor
Joined: 24 Dec 2018
Posts: 1066
Own Kudos [?]: 1432 [0]
Given Kudos: 24
Send PM
Samuel Johnson criticizes Shakespeares characters for being less tha [#permalink]
Samuel Johnson criticizes Shakespeare’s characters for being less than natural, not free from (i) __________. Johnson’s (ii) __________ originates from a fanciless way of thinking to which everything appears (iii) __________ that is not insipid.

First Blank

Samuel Johnson criticizes Shakespeare’s characters for being less than natural, not free from (i) artificality.

The choice is affectation.

Second Blank

Johnson’s (ii) criticism originates from a fanciless way of thinking to which everything appears (iii) _________ that is not insipid.

The choice is censure.

Third Blank

Johnson’s (ii) censure originates from a fanciless way of thinking to which everything appears (iii) artificial that is not insipid.

The choice is unnatural

Related ideas and clues in the sentence highlighted

Samuel Johnson criticizes Shakespeare’s characters for being less than natural, not free from (i) affectation. Johnson’s (ii) censure originates from a fanciless way of thinking to which everything appears (iii) unnatural that is not insipid.

____________________________________________________________________________________
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Samuel Johnson criticizes Shakespeares characters for being less tha [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
234 posts
GRE Instructor
1066 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne