Last visit was: 21 Nov 2024, 18:35 It is currently 21 Nov 2024, 18:35

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30003
Own Kudos [?]: 36341 [1]
Given Kudos: 25927
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Oct 2021
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [0]
Given Kudos: 2
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30003
Own Kudos [?]: 36341 [0]
Given Kudos: 25927
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30003
Own Kudos [?]: 36341 [0]
Given Kudos: 25927
Send PM
Re: Traditional social science models of class groups in the United States [#permalink]
Expert Reply

Question 1


mallya12 wrote:
Q1 I got confused between C and D can u explain Why D is wrong and C is correct.

Q3) How do eliminate 2nd answer choice i.e " The traditional social science model of class differs from Ryan's in its assumption that women are financially dependent on men."

Question #1 asks us to determine the primary purpose of the passage. To do that, let's take a look at the passage's structure:
  • First, the author introduces "traditional social science models of class groups."
  • Then, the author examines the views of certain "feminist social scientists," which are contrasted with the traditional models.
  • Finally, the author examines the views of "other feminist analysts," which differ from both the traditional models and previously discussed feminist views.

Let's first look at (D):
Quote:
D. propose a feminist interpretation of class structure in the United States

There are a couple of problems with this answer choice -- first, the author does not "propose" a feminist interpretation -- he/she describes two different feminist interpretations of class structure. More importantly, the primary purpose of the passage is not just to propose a certain feminist interpretation, but rather to contrast several different perspectives on class structure. (D) is too narrow in scope, so it is not the correct answer.

Take a look at answer choice (C):
Quote:
C. consider differing views held by social scientists concerning women's class status in the United States

This accurately captures the primary purpose of the passage. The author first introduces the traditional model of class groups, then provides two differing views from a feminist perspective on the issue. From this, we can gather that the primary purpose of the passage is to "consider differing views held by social scientists concerning women's class status in the United States." (C) is the correct answer to question #1.
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30003
Own Kudos [?]: 36341 [0]
Given Kudos: 25927
Send PM
Traditional social science models of class groups in the United States [#permalink]
Expert Reply

Question 2



The passage never illustrates an "implicit middle-class bias in earlier feminist models of class and gender", so (B) must be eliminated.

Choice (D) is tricky, but think about how the passage is organized. First, the author talks about the traditional model, which is that class groups are based on economic status. According to that model, working-class women would be put in the same category as working-class men.

Then, the passage discusses the model used by "some feminist social scientists". This model says "that the basic division in American society is based on gender, and that the total female population, regardless of economic status, constitutes a distinct class." According to that model, women of different economic classes would be put in the same category.

"Recently, {...} other feminist analysts have questioned {the model presented by some feminist social scientists}" by "examining ways in which the condition of working-class women differs from that of middle-class women as well as from that of working-class men." In other words, the recent research questions the traditional model by saying that you can't put working-class women in the same category as working-class men. The recent research also questions the model of the feminist social scientists by saying that you can't put WORKING-CLASS women in the same category as MIDDLE-CLASS women.

Thus, the recent research addresses apparent inadequacies of BOTH the traditional model and the model of the feminist social scientists (earlier feminist analyses). This fits with choice (D).
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30003
Own Kudos [?]: 36341 [0]
Given Kudos: 25927
Send PM
Re: Traditional social science models of class groups in the United States [#permalink]
Expert Reply

Question 3


Now let's look at question #3:
Quote:
Which of the following statements best characterizes the relationship between traditional social science models of class and Ryan's model, as described in the passage?

Here is what the passage says about "traditional social science models of class":
Quote:
Traditional social science models of class groups in the United States are based on economic status and assume that women's economic status derives from association with men, typically fathers or husbands, and that women therefore have more compelling common interest with men of their own economic class than with women outside it.

The conclusion reached by social scientists applying "traditional models of class" is that "women... have more compelling common interest with men of their own economic class than with women outside it."

The reason behind this conclusion is that "women's economic status derives from association with men, typically fathers or husbands."

Here is what the passage says about Mary Ryan's findings:
Quote:
Social historian Mary Ryan, for example, has argued that in early-nineteenth-century America the identical legal status of working-class and middle-class free women outweighed the differences between women of these two classes: married women, regardless of their family's wealth, did essentially the same unpaid domestic work, and none could own property or vote.

Ryan's conclusion is that "the identical legal status of working-class and middle-class free women outweighed the differences between women of these two classes."

The main contrast between these two viewpoints is as follows:
  • Traditional models: show that economic status is more important than gender when examining divisions in society
  • Mary Ryan: believes that gender is more important than economic status when examining divisions in society

Now look at (B):
Quote:
(B) The traditional social science model of class differs from Ryan's in its assumption that women are financially dependent on men.

The traditional models described in the passage do make the assumption that "women's economic status derives from association with men." But, is this a difference between the traditional models and Ryan's argument?

Ryan does not specifically disagree with the notion that women are financially dependent on men. She just believes that gender is a more important factor than economic status when examining class in society.

Because the two models do not differ on this point, (B) is not the correct answer.

I hope that helps!
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: Traditional social science models of class groups in the United States [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
234 posts
GRE Instructor
1065 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne