Last visit was: 20 Dec 2024, 12:27 It is currently 20 Dec 2024, 12:27

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
GRE Prep Club Team Member
Joined: 20 Feb 2017
Posts: 2506
Own Kudos [?]: 3665 [2]
Given Kudos: 1053
GPA: 3.39
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 Sep 2019
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 15 May 2021
Posts: 24
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 18
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30425
Own Kudos [?]: 36778 [1]
Given Kudos: 26094
Send PM
Re: Most cable television companies currently require customers to subscri [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



Two points of view are expressed in the argument: consumer groups claim that a la carte pricing will reduce consumer costs, while the cable television industry claims that the current package pricing structure is most cost effective for consumers. If the goal of the government is to reduce the cost of cable television for consumers, it is critical for the government to determine which point of view is correct. The cable television industry favorably compares the cost of buying bundled channels to the cost of buying those same channels individually, but what if most consumers would choose to greatly reduce the number of channels purchased? That could mean that a la carte pricing would result in lower cable bills for those consumers.

(A) The government's decision is based only on the costs to consumers, not the number of channels available to them.

(B) The government's decision is based only on the costs to consumers, not the advertising profits of the cable television companies.

(C) CORRECT. If consumers would not choose to order all of the channels they currently buy as part of a package subscription, then the cable television industries' claim that a la carte costs always would increase is faulty. If most consumers only watch and wish to pay for a few of their favorite channels, a la carte pricing could very well result in lower cable bills for those consumers. Consumers who want to purchase more channels could still choose the package subscriptions, so a la carte pricing would not harm them.

(D) The government's decision is based on only the costs to consumers, not the current purchasing agreements that exist between the cable television companies and content providers.

(E) The government's decision is based on only the costs to consumers, not the technical equipment requirements a change in cost structure would require.
User avatar
SVP
SVP
Joined: 07 Jan 2021
Posts: 1730
Own Kudos [?]: 53 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Most cable television companies currently require customers to subscri [#permalink]
Hello from the GRE Prep Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GRE Prep Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: Most cable television companies currently require customers to subscri [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
234 posts
GRE Instructor
1066 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne