Last visit was: 21 Nov 2024, 21:52 It is currently 21 Nov 2024, 21:52

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30003
Own Kudos [?]: 36341 [1]
Given Kudos: 25927
Send PM
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30003
Own Kudos [?]: 36341 [0]
Given Kudos: 25927
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Aug 2022
Posts: 23
Own Kudos [?]: 10 [1]
Given Kudos: 7
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Jul 2022
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
GRE 1: Q167 V170
Send PM
Re: Number of square tiles needed to cover a space on a wall of 72 x 108 [#permalink]
Trying to figure out what I did wrong here. I got B .

A: length of one tile = perim / 4 = 9. tiles to cover width side =72/9 = 8 tiles to cover length side = 108/9 = 12. Whole area = 8*12 = 96
B: length of one tile = sqrt(area) = 3. tiles to cover width side =72/3 = 24 tiles to cover length side= 36. two sides each for rectangular border = 24*2 + 36*2 = 120
-- we already know B is greater, but to actually cover the whole border, we would need to cover the four corners with tiles too, bringing the total of B to 124.

did i misunderstand part of the question? Thanks
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30003
Own Kudos [?]: 36341 [0]
Given Kudos: 25927
Send PM
Re: Number of square tiles needed to cover a space on a wall of 72 x 108 [#permalink]
Expert Reply
OE


Quote:
Explanation: Read carefully – did you notice that the tiles specified in Column A had a perimeter of 36 inches, while the tiles in Column B were specified using their area? This is especially easy to miss since 36 is a perfect square. For Column A, the tiles have side length of 36/4 = 9”. You will need 72/9 = 8 tiles along the width, and 108/9 = 12 tiles along the length; (12)(8) = 96 tiles. Now, since the square border tiles have area of 9 square inches, they must have side length of 3”. The width can be bordered by 72/3 = 24 tiles, while the length can be bordered by 108/3 = 36 tiles. Don’t forget there are two lengths and two widths, for a total of 24 + 24 + 36 + 36 = 120 tiles. (You might also want to add another 4 tiles, for the corners, but it doesn’t make a difference for this problem.)

So more 3” small tiles are needed for the border (120) than large 9” tiles for the area (96). If you had used 6” tiles for the area as the problem attempted to mislead you, you would have needed 216 of them and mistakenly chosen A.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 17 Jul 2022
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
GRE 1: Q167 V170
Send PM
Re: Number of square tiles needed to cover a space on a wall of 72 x 108 [#permalink]
1
Carcass wrote:
OE


Quote:
Explanation: Read carefully – did you notice that the tiles specified in Column A had a perimeter of 36 inches, while the tiles in Column B were specified using their area? This is especially easy to miss since 36 is a perfect square. For Column A, the tiles have side length of 36/4 = 9”. You will need 72/9 = 8 tiles along the width, and 108/9 = 12 tiles along the length; (12)(8) = 96 tiles. Now, since the square border tiles have area of 9 square inches, they must have side length of 3”. The width can be bordered by 72/3 = 24 tiles, while the length can be bordered by 108/3 = 36 tiles. Don’t forget there are two lengths and two widths, for a total of 24 + 24 + 36 + 36 = 120 tiles. (You might also want to add another 4 tiles, for the corners, but it doesn’t make a difference for this problem.)

So more 3” small tiles are needed for the border (120) than large 9” tiles for the area (96). If you had used 6” tiles for the area as the problem attempted to mislead you, you would have needed 216 of them and mistakenly chosen A.


Thanks for posting this, but does this mean the answer should be B (the Show Answer link above shows A)? Thx
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30003
Own Kudos [?]: 36341 [0]
Given Kudos: 25927
Send PM
Re: Number of square tiles needed to cover a space on a wall of 72 x 108 [#permalink]
Expert Reply
pster79 wrote:
Carcass wrote:
OE


Quote:
Explanation: Read carefully – did you notice that the tiles specified in Column A had a perimeter of 36 inches, while the tiles in Column B were specified using their area? This is especially easy to miss since 36 is a perfect square. For Column A, the tiles have side length of 36/4 = 9”. You will need 72/9 = 8 tiles along the width, and 108/9 = 12 tiles along the length; (12)(8) = 96 tiles. Now, since the square border tiles have area of 9 square inches, they must have side length of 3”. The width can be bordered by 72/3 = 24 tiles, while the length can be bordered by 108/3 = 36 tiles. Don’t forget there are two lengths and two widths, for a total of 24 + 24 + 36 + 36 = 120 tiles. (You might also want to add another 4 tiles, for the corners, but it doesn’t make a difference for this problem.)

So more 3” small tiles are needed for the border (120) than large 9” tiles for the area (96). If you had used 6” tiles for the area as the problem attempted to mislead you, you would have needed 216 of them and mistakenly chosen A.


Thanks for posting this, but does this mean the answer should be B (the Show Answer link above shows A)? Thx


:(

The answer is indeed B but the book reports A in the OA. The explanation B
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: Number of square tiles needed to cover a space on a wall of 72 x 108 [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Instructor
84 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
Moderator
1111 posts
GRE Instructor
234 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne