Last visit was: 23 Nov 2024, 15:13 It is currently 23 Nov 2024, 15:13

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30016
Own Kudos [?]: 36366 [11]
Given Kudos: 25928
Send PM
Most Helpful Expert Reply
avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 04 Feb 2019
Posts: 204
Own Kudos [?]: 418 [10]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
General Discussion
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 14 Jan 2019
Posts: 31
Own Kudos [?]: 21 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: 22 Oct 2018
Posts: 86
Own Kudos [?]: 138 [0]
Given Kudos: 26
Send PM
Re: Until recently astronomers have been puzzled by the fate of [#permalink]

+1 kudos to the posts containing answer explanations of all questions

avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 Jan 2018
Posts: 35
Own Kudos [?]: 18 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Until recently astronomers have been puzzled by the fate of [#permalink]
MagooshStudentHelp wrote:
21. The primary purpose is introduced in the first paragraph. The central problem is: "we might expect that one out of every two stars would die as a supernova. But in fact, only one star in thirty dies such a violent death." How do we explain that paradox? The passage attempts to explain one possible theory. D is the best choice.

22. Here's the relevant portion: "Theoretical models, as well as statistics on supernovas and planetary nebulas, suggest that stars that begin their lives with masses around 6 M⊙ shed sufficient material to drop below the critical value of 1.4 M⊙. IRC + 10216, for example, should do this in a mere 50,000 years from its birth, only an instant in the life of a star." IRC + 10216 is given as an illustration of a star who begins its life with a mass around 6 M⊙ and sheds down to below 1.4 M⊙ by the end of its life. Hence, IRC + 10216 must have started its life at around 6 M⊙.

23. The pronoun "this" in "this view" refers to the fact that "most massive stars manage to lose sufficient material that their masses drop below the critical value of 1.4 M⊙ before they exhaust their nuclear fuel." The fact is mentioned as an explanation of the paradox that most stars are born larger than 1.4 M⊙ but do not end as supernovas. Since such large stars should create supernovas, the mentioned view serves to reconcile the seemingly contradictory facts.

24. The rate of matter loss is measured by observing the circumstellar cloud. The point here is that matter lossed by the star becomes part of the cloud. If the cloud does not consist of material expelled by the star, then the composition of the cloud would not relate to the star itself.

25. Here's the relevant portion: "Once the star has lost the entire envelope, its exposed core becomes the central star of the planetary nebula and heats and ionizes the last vestiges of the envelope as it flows away into space. This configuration is a full-fledged planetary nebula, long familiar to optical astronomers." If it is familiar to optical astronomers, that means it must be able to be seen. A planetary nebula occurs when a star finishes it's life cycle (running out of nuclear fuel) and is now just an exposed core. This correlates best with choice A.

26. The final paragraph labels IRC + 10216 as a "protoplanetary nebulas" that has almost, but not quite, used up its fuel. It thus falls between a normal giant star and a full-fledged planetary nebula. Choice D fits bets with this assessment, summing up the contents of the final paragraph.

27. Since we're summarizing the content, this is kind of like a primary purpose question. Crucially, the passage is attempting to answer a question: Why do most stars, despite their size, end as nebulas instead of supernovas? Certainly, the passage is not just about methods of calculation, nor is it primarily concerned with composition, eliminating A and B. We have no evidence that protoplanetary nebulas are rare, eliminating C. Between D and E, choice D does not address the passages main question, while E does. The answer to the question is that stars get smaller with time, and that's the big point the passage is making.



Hi, could you please explain the question 25, why not E? Isn't IRC + 10216 a nebulas?
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30016
Own Kudos [?]: 36366 [0]
Given Kudos: 25928
Send PM
Re: Until recently astronomers have been puzzled by the fate of [#permalink]
Expert Reply
This is a very tough question. Under pressure, you need HUGE control of the argument to reply correctly .

(A) A star that began its life with a mass of 5.5 M⊙, has exhausted its nuclear fuel, and has a core that is visible to astronomers

The gravitational energy released during this implosion of the core blows off the remainder of the star in a gigantic explosion, or a supernova. But in fact, only one star in thirty dies such a violent death. The rest expire much more peacefully as planetary nebulas.

All that means the core is visible by astronomers because we do not have an explosion

Apparently most massive stars manage to lose sufficient material that their masses drop below the critical value of 1.4 M⊙ before they exhaust their nuclear fuel.

(E) A star that began its life with a mass of 5.5 M⊙, has yet to exhaust its nuclear fuel, and exhibits a rate of mass loss similar to that of IRC + 10216

Theoretical models, as well as statistics on supernovas and planetary nebulas, suggest that stars that begin their lives with masses around 6 M⊙ shed sufficient material to drop below the critical value of 1.4 M⊙. IRC + 10216, for example, should do this in a mere 50,000 years from its birth, only an instant in the life of a star.


From this, we do not know that RC + 10216 releases the fuel very quickly which means that in E the yet exhausted nuclear fuel is not totally true and the rate loss is different.

Moreover, planetary nebula has a mass of more than 5.5 but IRC more than 6.0 which is different.

Hope this helps
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Sep 2019
Posts: 28
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Until recently astronomers have been puzzled by the fate of [#permalink]
q25: what would option C be described as? in my opinion planetary nebula..
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 19 Aug 2019
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: Until recently astronomers have been puzzled by the fate of [#permalink]
1
vanjaninikhil wrote:
q25: what would option C be described as? in my opinion planetary nebula..



Astronomers suggest that stars like IRC + 10216 are actually "protoplanetary nebulas"—old giant stars whose dense cores have almost but not quite rid themselves of the fluffy envelopes of gas around them.

So, option C would be called as "protoplanetary nebulas"
Retired Moderator
Joined: 02 Dec 2020
Posts: 1831
Own Kudos [?]: 2146 [1]
Given Kudos: 140
GRE 1: Q168 V157

GRE 2: Q167 V161
Send PM
Until recently astronomers have been puzzled by the fate of [#permalink]
1
Astronomers suggest that stars like IRC + 10216 are actually "protoplanetary nebulas"—old giant stars whose dense cores have almost but not quite rid themselves of the fluffy envelopes of gas around them.

Once the star has lost the entire envelope, its exposed core becomes the central star of the planetary nebula

vanjaninikhil wrote:
q25: what would option C be described as? in my opinion planetary nebula..
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30016
Own Kudos [?]: 36366 [1]
Given Kudos: 25928
Send PM
Re: Until recently astronomers have been puzzled by the fate of [#permalink]
1
Expert Reply
Up for further discussion about this monster of a passage
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: Until recently astronomers have been puzzled by the fate of [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
234 posts
GRE Instructor
1065 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne