The concept of a true constructivist education, as envisioned by Piaget, Vygotsky, and Bruner, is an attractive goal. A renewed focus on experiential and project-based learning that focuses on activity rather than memorization and drilling is evident in curricula, national standards, and the missions of many primary and secondary schools. Some argue that a constructivist learning approach leads to an unregulated melee of classroom activity that results in wildly varying knowledge bases and skill sets. However, this overlooks the fact that the pursuit of profound knowledge through unconventional means is the ultimate goal in higher education. In conventional education, students are asked to master specifically delineated content associated with their age-determined grade, but students never truly "learn how to learn." In many cases, students who learn to flourish as passive learners agonize when challenged by open-ended project tasks and assessments or other assignments that lack boundaries. Beneficiaries of a constructivist education are better equipped than conventionally trained students to thrive in these situations.
The author would most likely agree with which statement about students who learn in a constructivist environment?
A. They are more likely than other students to earn high scores on assessments that test a broad knowledge base.
B. They adapt more easily to a variety of learning tasks than do other students.
C. They will be successful in the working world when they grow up.
D. They are unlikely to demonstrate self-control or good behavior.
E. They require constant activity in the classroom to master content.