Last visit was: 21 Nov 2024, 17:03 It is currently 21 Nov 2024, 17:03

Close

GRE Prep Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GRE score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
GRE Prep Club Team Member
Joined: 20 Feb 2017
Posts: 2508
Own Kudos [?]: 3621 [4]
Given Kudos: 1053
GPA: 3.39
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2020
Posts: 440
Own Kudos [?]: 61 [0]
Given Kudos: 68
Send PM
GRE Prep Club Team Member
Joined: 20 Feb 2017
Posts: 2508
Own Kudos [?]: 3621 [2]
Given Kudos: 1053
GPA: 3.39
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Mar 2016
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: A meteor stream is composed of dust particles that have been ejected [#permalink]
1
Don't understand how to find primary focus from such passage as this one. :(
Verbal Expert
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Posts: 30003
Own Kudos [?]: 36341 [0]
Given Kudos: 25927
Send PM
A meteor stream is composed of dust particles that have been ejected [#permalink]
Expert Reply
nahid wrote:
Don't understand how to find primary focus from such passage as this one. :(


I am sorry. I did a great guide about RC and the main idea but I needed to redo the process so for now it is not completed yet. I am sorry sir

Back to the question

The main idea is what the author usually conveys. It is a sense of the overall passage

A meteor stream is composed of dust particles that have been ejected from a parent comet at a variety of velocities. These particles follow the same orbit as the parent comet, but due to their differing velocities they slowly gain on or fall behind the disintegrating comet until a shroud of dust surrounds the entire cometary orbit. Astronomers have hypothesized that a meteor stream should broaden with time as the dust particles' individual orbits are perturbed by planetary gravitational fields. A recent computer-modeling experiment tested this hypothesis by tracking the influence of planetary gravitation over a projected 5,000-year period on the positions of a group of hypothetical dust particles. In the model, the particles were randomly distributed throughout a computer simulation of the orbit of an actual meteor stream, the Geminid. The researcher found, as expected, that the computer-model stream broadened with time. Conventional theories, however, predicted that the distribution of particles would be increasingly dense toward the center of a meteor stream. Surprisingly, the computer-model meteor stream gradually came to resemble a thick-walled, hollow pipe.


Whenever the Earth passes through a meteor stream, a meteor shower occurs. Moving at a little over 1,500,000 miles per day around its orbit, the Earth would take, on average, just over a day to cross the hollow, computer-model Geminid stream if the stream were 5,000 years old. Two brief periods of peak meteor activity during the shower would be observed, one as the Earth entered the thick-walled "pipe" and one as it exited. There is no reason why the Earth should always pass through the stream's exact center, so the time interval between the two bursts of activity would vary from one year to the next.

Has the predicted twin-peaked activity been observed for the actual yearly Geminid meteor shower? The Geminid data between 1970 and 1979 shows just such a bifurcation, a secondary burst of meteor activity being clearly visible at an average of 19 hours (1,200,000 miles) after the first burst. The time intervals between the bursts suggest the actual Geminid stream is about 3,000 years


As you can see above by the highlighted parts, the scientists have a theory and then a computer model confirmed it providing data

The details about numbers are not so important

(A) Comparing two scientific theories and contrasting the predictions that each would make concerning a natural phenomenon

no comparison about theories

(B) Describing a new theoretical model and noting that it explains the nature of observations made of a particular natural phenomenon

yes. a phenomenon and the details about it (the numbers provided in the passage)

(C) Evaluating the results of a particular scientific experiment and suggesting further areas for research

No new areas of further research

(D) Explaining how two different natural phenomena are related and demonstrating a way to measure them

NO two different phenomena

(E) Analyzing recent data derived from observations of an actual phenomenon and constructing a model to explain the data

no construction of a new model. we have a theory confirmed by data

That is the main idea

Notice how we do have first : Astronomers have hypothesized and then Conventional theories, however,


That means we had theories, classic, and now the scientists think of something new to test in reality. This should lead you directly to the second option: a new model. We do not have a NEW model in the other answer choices


I hope this helps

ask for further assistance if you do need sir
Intern
Intern
Joined: 24 May 2022
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 2 [0]
Given Kudos: 70
Send PM
Re: A meteor stream is composed of dust particles that have been ejected [#permalink]
can anyone please explain Q6 and Q7
GRE Prep Club Team Member
Joined: 20 Feb 2017
Posts: 2508
Own Kudos [?]: 3621 [2]
Given Kudos: 1053
GPA: 3.39
Send PM
Re: A meteor stream is composed of dust particles that have been ejected [#permalink]
2
Expert Reply
saumrnjn wrote:
can anyone please explain Q6 and Q7


Overall - fairly confused at first. I was having difficulties trying to figure out what was going on with latter pargraphs.
Passage Map:
P1: To describe meteor stream theories and proliferation of computer model
P2: to state technical info. regarding streams
P3: to discuss evidence on streams

Q6
Most of this is contained in P1.
Conventional theories predict that particles are more dense toward the centre of meteor streams whereas computer models predict that streams broaden over time.
However, the computer model came to show that gradually particles grouped to form a thick-walled, hollow pipe.

What is a prediction we can make from both theories?
A- this is clearly false since we know that particles clump in two regions (outer edges of the hollow-pipe)
B - we can't really support when and what meteor streams the Earth crosses based on the theories alone. Incorrect
C cannot be derived from the conventional theory. Incorrect
D is supportable. Here's why:
P1 states that the meteor streams "broaden over time" - allowing us to conclude that the hollow forms as the meteor stream ages. Earth passes through the hollow "thick pipe.
Thus it can be inferred that the older a meteor shower, the longer it would take to pass through the first peak of activity, then pass through the hollow, then pass through the second peak as the older meteor showers are broader than younger.
E is incorrect - we know nothing of the relative size of the dust particles.

Q7
The first sentence states "yearly geminid meteor shower"
Therefore C is correct - the Earth passes through the meteor stream once per year
A is incorrect because we don't have any comparative info to identify the age of other streams.
B is incorrect because we are told in p2 "there is no reason the earth should ALWAYS pass through the stream's exact center"
D is incorrect because we are only given an average of 19 hours "after the first burst" before Earth hits the second stream, so clearly the Earth could take a lot longer to pass through both streams completely.
E is incorrect because there is no such evidence commenting on the sun's involvement in earth's orbital course through the meteor streams discussed.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Jan 2021
Posts: 62
Own Kudos [?]: 80 [1]
Given Kudos: 898
Send PM
Re: A meteor stream is composed of dust particles that have been ejected [#permalink]
1
A challenging passage with thorough explanations. Thanks!
Prep Club for GRE Bot
Re: A meteor stream is composed of dust particles that have been ejected [#permalink]
Moderators:
GRE Forum Moderator
37 posts
GRE Instructor
234 posts
GRE Instructor
1065 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne