Sasha: It must be healthy to follow a diet high in animal proteins and fats. Human beings undoubtedly evolved to thrive on such a diet, since our prehistoric ancestors ate large amounts of meat.

Jamal: But our ancestors also exerted themselves intensely in order to obtain this food, whereas most human beings today are much less physically active.

Argument Analysis

So Sasha is proposing that It must be healthy to eat Proteins as our Prehistoric Ancestors did so,

Now Jamal is saying Sasha could be right but She is missing one crucial point that earlier Human used to extend themselves extensively which is not the Case now in modern era.


Jamal responds to Sasha by doing which of the following?

A. Refuting her statement about our prehistoric ancestors

Jamal is not exactly refuting her statement Jamal is pointing out something which Sasha is missing in her analysis

B. Bringing forth a piece of information for the purpose of suggesting that she should qualify her main conclusion

This is exactly matches with the Two arguments. Jamal is providing new pieces of Information which Sasha is missing.

C. Citing additional evidence that indirectly supports her conclusion and suggests a way to broaden it

Jamal is not supporting Sasha's conclusion

D. Questioning whether her assumption about our prehistoric ancestors permits any conclusions about human evolution

Jamal doesn't talk about Human Evaluation at all.

E. Expressing doubts about whether most human beings today are as healthy as our prehistoric ancestors were
Question is about whether Human should eat meat heavily. Doubt is not about whether our ancestors were more healthy

Answer: B